Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just read this latest issue quickly while on the pot last night, and I did not see Fred Beckey mentioned anywhere. Did I miss something? Nice piece about Colin Haley in the up-and-comers, though. But note that he is the only alpinist in the group.

 

Let me know if I missed something. Maybe the fumes were getting to me. But it seems like the emphasis is too slanted toward Yosemite climbers. I'm going to write the editors and bitch just for fun.

 

Woozily yours,

 

John Sharp

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

But it seems like the emphasis is too slanted toward Yosemite climbers.

 

R&I has been on a Yosemite kick for awhile now. Many covers and articles on Yose. I don't mind too much, but at the same time I know that there is a shitload of great climbers that do not hale from Yosemite.

Posted

But it seems like the emphasis is too slanted toward Yosemite climbers.

 

R&I has been on a Yosemite kick for awhile now. Many covers and articles on Yose. I don't mind too much, but at the same time I know that there is a shitload of great climbers that do not hale from Yosemite.

 

Fuckin Duh. You haven't figured it out yet that Cock and Lice and that other dumb ass climbing mag are all and only about the Boulder and Yos scene? I mean places like Washington only offer dirt and moss or a second-rate spot for a quaint mountaineering excursion.

Posted
I mean places like Washington only offer dirt and moss or a second-rate spot for a quaint mountaineering excursion.

 

Ssshhh.....we need to keep this little climbing area as our own deep dark secret. Nobody needs to know! Especially not the climbing press!

Posted

Fuckin Duh. You haven't figured it out yet that Cock and Lice and that other dumb ass climbing mag are all and only about the Boulder and Yos scene? I mean places like Washington only offer dirt and moss or a second-rate spot for a quaint mountaineering excursion.

 

The mags are just out there to make money, and talking about the clean rock of Yose, and Boulder makes money. Washington has great routes on both rock and mountain, but there are not many mag sellers around... Maybe we should start a 'Northwest Climbing Mag' and focus on The Cascades and Beckey. Or maybe we should just climb and enjoy the lack of coverage, which also means less crowds. grin.gif

Posted

Hell yes. That's why we live here instead of Colorado. MattP and crew have done an amazing job with the NMJ too. We just need to keep articles like Wayne's Pickets Traverse expose out of the AAJ hahaha.gif

Posted
. We just need to keep articles like Wayne's Pickets Traverse expose out of the AAJ hahaha.gif

 

I have been waiting for someone to pipe in with that!!!!!!

 

I feel the same way,

It just wasnt an opportunity I could just pass up.

Let it be known that they invited me to write it.

Thanks Pete.

Posted

its also funny that there are 4 different covers that were issued and they include one with john long, one with royal robbins, and i can't rember the other one (maybe warren harding), but the forth one has Lauren lee?

Posted

As far as climbing goes, Yosemite and Boulder kick washington's ass. Yes, we have some good climbing up here but show me 3000ft vertical walls of clean granite. Yes, WA has good cragging but Boulder has 10x what we have within 30 min of town.

 

Granted that WA has good alpine but if your talking vertical climbing Yos is THE place in the lower 48.

Posted

 

I completely disagree with you guys regarding Boulder. If you ignore the 30’ part which is true only because of the very short timeline, I would argue that within a 60 mile radius of Seattle the granite climbing is by far superior to the granite climbing around Boulder. Add to that the fact that Squamish is far better than Lumpy or the Platte and Seattle maintains its position. True El Dorado/Flat Irons are pretty darn close but after spending most of a summer in Boulder, I can honestly say that I have never desired to go back and climb at either location.

Posted
Yes, we have some good climbing up here but show me 3000ft vertical walls of clean granite.

 

Clean granite is for fags.

 

 

You can easily get in 3000' ft a killer basalt in long day at Rocky Butte. Plus you get free porn. Boulder ain't got nothing on Portland.

Posted
Yes, we have some good climbing up here but show me 3000ft vertical walls of clean granite.

 

Clean granite is for fags.

 

 

You can easily get in 3000' ft a killer basalt in long day at Rocky Butte. Plus you get free porn. Boulder ain't got nothing on Portland.

are we talking vertical or horizontal?? confused.gif
Posted

I completely disagree with you guys regarding Boulder. If you ignore the 30’ part which is true only because of the very short timeline, I would argue that within a 60 mile radius of Seattle the granite climbing is by far superior to the granite climbing around Boulder. Add to that the fact that Squamish is far better than Lumpy or the Platte and Seattle maintains its position. True El Dorado/Flat Irons are pretty darn close but after spending most of a summer in Boulder, I can honestly say that I have never desired to go back and climb at either location.

 

I lived in Boulder for a few years. I never liked the granite in Boulder Canyon. It wasn't chossy, but it sucked in some way. Lumpy's pretty cool; you do have to get used to flairing cracks. I loved Eldo, but it really isn't that big a place, so it's easy to burn out on it.

 

RMNP has a lot of good granite, and it's basically a high alpine cragging area. The only other place I climbed at a lot was Veedawoo; and that place has some awsome granite cragging.

 

All in all there's good cragging around Boulder, but I would say that Colorado lacks any true alpine climbing; at least by my definition...you should see the things they call glaciers. yellaf.gif

 

CO may get an advantage over WA in terms of cragging, but Rudy brought up an excellent point that there are a lot of assholes in Boulder. In fact that negative totally outweighs any advantage they might have in craggs or good cragging weather.

Posted

I completely disagree with you guys regarding Boulder. If you ignore the 30’ part which is true only because of the very short timeline, I would argue that within a 60 mile radius of Seattle the granite climbing is by far superior to the granite climbing around Boulder. Add to that the fact that Squamish is far better than Lumpy or the Platte and Seattle maintains its position. True El Dorado/Flat Irons are pretty darn close but after spending most of a summer in Boulder, I can honestly say that I have never desired to go back and climb at either location.

 

the only really drawback is of course we have worse weather in the winter.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...