Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
A Nature editorial answers the latest deniers' farce:

 

The e-mail archives stolen last month from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (UEA), UK, have been greeted by the climate-change-denialist fringe as a propaganda windfall (see page 551). To these denialists, the scientists' scathing remarks about certain controversial palaeoclimate reconstructions qualify as the proverbial 'smoking gun': proof that mainstream climate researchers have systematically conspired to suppress evidence contradicting their doctrine that humans are warming the globe.

 

This paranoid interpretation would be laughable were it not for the fact that obstructionist politicians in the US Senate will probably use it next year as an excuse to stiffen their opposition to the country's much needed climate bill. Nothing in the e-mails undermines the scientific case that global warming is real — or that human activities are almost certainly the cause. That case is supported by multiple, robust lines of evidence, including several that are completely independent of the climate reconstructions debated in the e-mails.

 

[..]

 

 

If there are benefits to the e-mail theft, one is to highlight yet again the harassment that denialists inflict on some climate-change researchers, often in the form of endless, time-consuming demands for information under the US and UK Freedom of Information Acts. Governments and institutions need to provide tangible assistance for researchers facing such a burden.

 

[..]

 

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v462/n7273/full/462545a.html

 

Dinosaur bones.

  • Replies 324
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

 

Did you actually read this? Chris Horner - the famed lawyer from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and reciepient of over $2M in funding from Exxon Mobile over the last few years, "believes" NASA is hiding something. How can you not write sarcastic emails about this crap. Some non-scientist writes a pop-fiction book about global warming skepticisim, has an opinion based on nothing in a field he knows nothing about, and it's put on the Moonie's Washington Times banner. Got any other gems?

Posted (edited)

 

Did you actually read this? Chris Horner - the famed lawyer from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and reciepient of over $2M in funding from Exxon Mobile over the last few years, "believes" NASA is hiding something. How can you not write sarcastic emails about this crap. Some non-scientist writes a pop-fiction book about global warming skepticisim, has an opinion based on nothing in a field he knows nothing about, and it's put on the Moonie's Washington Times banner. Got any other gems?

 

You actually clicked on it?

 

I mean, taking a potshot at FW once in a while is one thing. It's like a bucket of kittens conveniently placed under a spicket, but reading his links...that is a level of commitment I just can't muster.

Edited by tvashtarkatena
Posted

yes, it's a vast communist conspiracy. The commies have taken over all climatology departments and labs, and the scientific societies and academies worldwide that have all expressed their support for global warming science. In fact, science itself is likely a communist plot as is obvious in theories claiming that the earth isn't flat, isn't at the center of the universe, that we descended from apes, that cfc's are to be blamed for stratospheric ozone depletion, that smoking and asbestos cause cancer, etc ..

Posted

just look at it this way folks: anthropogenic climate change denialists have come out for the conspiracy nutjobs they really are. At this stage of the game, they have little to lose since some emission controls are likely to result from Copenhagen.

Posted

Has anyone noticed that after such brilliant display of logical thinking (claiming the science is invalid and a vast conspiracy on the basis of e-mails taken out of context) almost nobody calls them "skeptics" anymore (the "denialist fringe" says Nature). I predict this is going to be payback time as in scientists aren't anymore going to take the smears and the abuse from a bunch of ideologue nitwits that couldn't find their way out of a paper bag.

Posted
Has anyone noticed that after such brilliant display of logical thinking (claiming the science is invalid and a vast conspiracy on the basis of e-mails taken out of context) almost nobody calls them "skeptics" anymore (the "denialist fringe" says Nature). I predict this is going to be payback time as in scientists aren't anymore going to take the smears and the abuse from a bunch of ideologue nitwits that couldn't find their way out of a paper bag.

 

Wait until the Scientists and the Atheists join forces to blot out the disease Religion.

Posted

global warming takes a back seat when it is winter in the northern hemisphere...this is how the media works

 

when it comes summer....global warming reporting data will pick up

Posted

Think about it in context of the time frame.

A tin can on a giant firecracker.

You have a cannister of oxygen and a parachute.

 

The monkey didn't have a choice.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...