Hugh Conway Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Big enough loser to post on cc.com? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bstach Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Can someone explain to me why this race was even close? Isn't WA a D state? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Can someone explain to me why this race was even close? Isn't WA a D state? Â D for dumbfuck, apparently. Â Thank Dog for California. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Why'd they vote down the pot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Mixed bag. Statewide initiative failed big but apparently some cities voted for a pot tax protocol. Details vary case by case. Â Maybe the issue will loosen up at the municipal level, similar to Amsterdam (it already is, actually...Oaksterdam)...or the many alcohol prohibitions/lack thereof that has existed since prohibition in NJ, PA, TX, etc. The same for pot would require some tolerance at the state and federal level. Will that happen? Hmmm....Obama's cockblocking AG says they'll interfere. Â My observation is that most 'libertarians' are really 'anti-liberals' with a property rights/gun fetish...their actions have nothing at all to do with most other aspects pertaining to personal liberty - the ones that actually matter in the larger sense. Â Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Conway Posted November 3, 2010 Author Share Posted November 3, 2010 Why'd they vote down the pot? Â because the poor and uneducated drag down California as well http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2010/results/county/#CAI01p1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Why'd they vote down the pot? Â Because the pro-pot people were not anti-pot enough? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Why'd they vote down the pot?  because the poor and uneducated drag down California as well  So this is why Democrats win in CA?? I see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Conway Posted November 3, 2010 Author Share Posted November 3, 2010 So this is why Democrats win in CA?? I see. Â No, Democrats won this time in CA because the California Republican party picked a bunch of fucking morons to run. $160+ million and you're 10 points down. Genius. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Why'd they vote down the pot?  because the poor and uneducated drag down California as well  So this is why Democrats win in CA?? I see.  The Moonbeam has returned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 So this is why Democrats win in CA?? I see. Â No, Democrats won this time in CA because the California Republican party picked a bunch of fucking morons to run. $160+ million and you're 10 points down. Genius. Â Money can't buy you love. Some people are just too cunty for even the most indiscriminate electorate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Conway Posted November 3, 2010 Author Share Posted November 3, 2010 The Moonbeam has returned  more than fuckable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 (edited) The Moonbeam has returned  more than fuckable  Yup. Meanwhile, KKK's stuck in a too-many-kids, dull-as-shit cubeworld suburban hell. Anyone not settling for that deathly dull existence is, of course, a moonbat, beam, whatever.  Brown was actually a great governor. That dumb cunt Whitman ran an ad talking about how great CA was when she moved there...when Brown was governor LOL. Of course, the Brown campaign didn't hesitate to edit in that last little detail and re-run it LOL. Edited November 3, 2010 by tvashtarkatena Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Yup. Meanwhile, KKK's stuck in a too-many-kids, dull-as-shit cubeworld suburban hell. Anyone not settling for that deathly dull existence is, of course, a moonbat, beam, whatever. Â LOL! You sound really "happy" in your "existence", tubby. Really, we believe you! Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
summitchaserCJB Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 (edited) Mixed bag. Statewide initiative failed big but apparently some cities voted for a pot tax protocol. Details vary case by case. Â Maybe the issue will loosen up at the municipal level, similar to Amsterdam (it already is, actually...Oaksterdam)...or the many alcohol prohibitions/lack thereof that has existed since prohibition in NJ, PA, TX, etc. The same for pot would require some tolerance at the state and federal level. Will that happen? Hmmm....Obama's cockblocking AG says they'll interfere. Â My observation is that most 'libertarians' are really 'anti-liberals' with a property rights/gun fetish...their actions have nothing at all to do with most other aspects pertaining to personal liberty - the ones that actually matter in the larger sense. Â Thats very much my observation (in terms of libertarians- myself included) . Didn't know the made em any other way., Edited November 3, 2010 by summitchaserCJB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 My observation is that most 'libertarians' are really 'anti-liberals' with a property rights/gun fetish...their actions have nothing at all to do with most other aspects pertaining to personal liberty - the ones that actually matter in the larger sense. Â Â That's kind of a funny statement since property rights lie at the heart of personal liberty--and at the core of Enlightenment liberalism. My observation is that most contemporary 'libertarians' just want to smoke out and not be bothered. No problem with that, but it's just too bad they don't care about the rest. That said, I'm glad you've taken a renewed interest in what you once called "that tired, dusty old document". Your ego seems intact--and that's really all that matters for our purposes here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Conway Posted November 4, 2010 Author Share Posted November 4, 2010 and the jackboot's out of the closet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitrox Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 My observation is that most 'libertarians' are really 'anti-liberals' with a property rights/gun fetish...their actions have nothing at all to do with most other aspects pertaining to personal liberty - the ones that actually matter in the larger sense. Â Â That's kind of a funny statement since property rights lie at the heart of personal liberty--and at the core of Enlightenment liberalism. My observation is that most contemporary 'libertarians' just want to smoke out and not be bothered. No problem with that, but it's just too bad they don't care about the rest. That said, I'm glad you've taken a renewed interest in what you once called "that tired, dusty old document". Your ego seems intact--and that's really all that matters for our purposes here. Â Kennedy Democrats were about property rights. New Democrats are about entitlement. Â Â Â Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 wow ur comment is worldly *and* profound! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Conway Posted November 4, 2010 Author Share Posted November 4, 2010 found? who? where? what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil K Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Wher'd you get that hooey Nitrox? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Can someone explain to me why this race was even close? Isn't WA a D state? Â Because Patty Murray is dumber than a brick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Vacuous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Can someone explain to me why this race was even close? Isn't WA a D state?  Because Patty Murray is dumber than a brick  WHAT DOES THAT SAY ABOUT ROSSI? HE LIKES IT THREE TIMES? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_White Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 I say we tattoo a big black L on his forehead and be done with the tool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.