JoshK Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Kurdistan Central Iraqi Republic Southern Islamic Republic of Iraq Oil reserves are already equally divided geographically. An agreement would have to be hashed out regarding distribution and access to The Shat'al Arab. No chance of convincing Turkey (our only true ally in that entire region) of creation of a Kurdish state... Quote
marylou Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 I saw no plan. Lot of BS Al Q/Iraq allusions though. That one's a little overplayed, Shrubbie. Quote
archenemy Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Personally, I have never heard of a man actually pulling out when he promised he was going to. have you? Quote
RuMR Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 He was supposed to tell us what the plan was. I didn't hear much in the way of a plan. Did you? (Is: "when they are ready to take over, we'll withdraw" a plan?) He was supposed to tell us what the plan was. I didn't hear much in the way of a plan. Did you? He was supposed to tell us what the plan was. I didn't hear much in the way of a plan. Did you? He was supposed to tell us what the plan was. I didn't hear much in the way of a plan. Did you? He was supposed to tell us what the plan was. I didn't hear much in the way of a plan. Did you? He was supposed to tell us what the plan was. I didn't hear much in the way of a plan. Did you? He was supposed to tell us what the plan was. I didn't hear much in the way of a plan. Did you? He was supposed to tell us what the plan was. I didn't hear much in the way of a plan. Did you? MattP asks; are we there yet? are we there yet? are we there yet? are we there yet? ... Well fuck, what is his plan?? Guess you don't know either, do you? You must be the bitch that sits in the passenger seat and says "honey, you'll know when we get there" Quote
mec Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Well fuck, what is his plan?? His plan is to act like everything is OK, have many press conferences, enjoy travelling via Air Force 1, and then have a good retirement paid for by you and I. Quote
archenemy Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Well fuck, what is his plan?? His plan is to act like everything is OK, have many press conferences, enjoy travelling via Air Force 1, and then have a good retirement paid for by you and I. Yeah, and have education paid for by you and me. Quote
Camilo Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 why would that be me vs. I?? Take away "you and" and the sentence doesn't make sense with "I" Quote
Dechristo Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 ...and then have a good retirement paid for by you and I. Read the sentence without "you and". Quote
glassgowkiss Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Kurdistan Central Iraqi Republic Southern Islamic Republic of Iraq Oil reserves are already equally divided geographically. An agreement would have to be hashed out regarding distribution and access to The Shat'al Arab. fairweather- once again you just show us how fucking bumb stupid and uneducated redneck you are. there is no point in arguing with someone who has no idea about the subject. period. SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU DOLT! Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 why would that be me vs. I?? because it follows a preposition Quote
mec Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 what's a preposition? Is that like a dangling modifier or a predicative adjective? Quote
Kitergal Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 nice! Thanks guys..you just edgumacated me!! Quote
Dechristo Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 why would that be me?? because you follow a proposition Quote
archenemy Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 what's a preposition? Is that like a dangling modifier or a predicative adjective? Prepositions: express relationships between other words, including relationships of time or space. Helpful trick--place the word before "the mountain" (over the mtn, by the mtn, to granny's house we go). Dangling participle (not modifier): participle placed in wrong part of sentence so it modifies wrong noun Predicate adjective: are often the same thing. The predicate is the part of the sentence that is not the subject (which usually includes adjectives). Now picture me as an evil teacher: whipping staff in hand and librarian glasses on nose. Get it right, young seeker of knowledge. Quote
bunglehead Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 But...What's a conjunction? What's the function? Quote
murraysovereign Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Who cares? I want to hear more about the whip and the librarian glasses... Quote
archenemy Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Who cares? I want to hear more about the whip and the librarian glasses... after my own heart Quote
Stefan Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Bush really doesn't give a fuck about the future of Iraq. His plan right from the get go was to get Saddam out of power. Even before he took office. Why? Becuase his daddy did not get Saddam out of power in the first Iraq war, and his daddy, Schwarzkopf, and all the rest of the Hawks (Rumsfeld,Wolfowitz,Schultz) in D.C. felt like a failure for not doing that during the end of the first war negotiations. But the main reason: W. was pissed off that Saddam had organized an assassination at his daddy after his daddy was no longer in power. Why do you not think there was no plan for after the war?--they did not give a crap after the war. Ridding Saddam of power was the goal. That's why you are seeing now all the reports of going to war was a key thing for Bushie to go. He was just looking for excuses. 9-11 was a good excuse. So were "weapons of mass destruction". Quote
mattp Posted June 29, 2005 Author Posted June 29, 2005 Yo Puget: What did YOU think of the speech? Quote
mec Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Bush really doesn't give a fuck about the future of Iraq. His plan right from the get go was to get Saddam out of power. Even before he took office. Why? Becuase his daddy did not get Saddam out of power in the first Iraq war, and his daddy, Schwarzkopf, and all the rest of the Hawks (Rumsfeld,Wolfowitz,Schultz) in D.C. felt like a failure for not doing that during the end of the first war negotiations. But the main reason: W. was pissed off that Saddam had organized an assassination at his daddy after his daddy was no longer in power. Why do you not think there was no plan for after the war?--they did not give a crap after the war. Ridding Saddam of power was the goal. That's why you are seeing now all the reports of going to war was a key thing for Bushie to go. He was just looking for excuses. 9-11 was a good excuse. So were "weapons of mass destruction". So where do you really stand on this issue? (however, I tend to agree. I just try not to believe anything a politician says until I see it really happen) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.