KaskadskyjKozak Posted April 28, 2005 Posted April 28, 2005 The media sure picked on Clinton; if they were a liberal media don't you think they would have tried to change the subject? They did. They covered just as much of the scandals for as possible to maximizie profits/viewership, while casting the accusers for each scandal is as negative a light as possible, questioning motives, expenditures, and legitimacy of the issues as much as possible. A win-win for the media. Quote
Ratboy Posted April 28, 2005 Posted April 28, 2005 Who gives a rat fuck if they're Demo/Repub, Lib/Conservative, Fuck 'em all. If they're getting rich by fleecing us and accepting kickbacks, run em out of town on a rail. Damn straight. We need a good house (and senate) cleaning in DC across the board. Delay can be the first to go. Worst of the worst. Quote
archenemy Posted April 28, 2005 Posted April 28, 2005 Yeah, but what do we replace them with? What human being wants to be a politician? Quote
bunglehead Posted April 28, 2005 Posted April 28, 2005 How about waterskiing squirrels? Those li'l guys are funny! That would make appropriations hearings so much more entertaining! Quote
Fairweather Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 I wager he announces his resignation next Tuesday, May 3rd. Whaahappen? The 7th, 9th, and 17th will pass too. Quote
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 I wager he announces his resignation next Tuesday, May 3rd. Whaahappen? The 7th, 9th, and 17th will pass too. Wow, F'eather. Victory is yours, dude. How ever will you celebrate such a momentous personal trimph over the filthy hordes of commie unbelievers? Quote
Skeezix Posted January 10, 2006 Author Posted January 10, 2006 OK, he's relinquished leadership. Any bets on when he resigns his seat? Quote
Alpinfox Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 May 9th DING! That crooked douchebag needs to go to prison. Quote
Alpinfox Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 The media sure picked on Clinton; if they were a liberal media don't you think they would have tried to change the subject? They did. They covered just as much of the scandals for as possible to maximizie profits/viewership, while casting the accusers for each scandal is as negative a light as possible, questioning motives, expenditures, and legitimacy of the issues as much as possible. A win-win for the media. BTW, I just read this shit. KK you are one idiotic motherfucker. no SHIT that SOME of the media questioned (though not as much as they should have) the motives, expenditures and legitimacy of the issues pertaining to Clinton getting some illicit nookie. Was there any motive EXCEPT political mudslinging? They spent how many HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS on the investigation? It was a BLOW JOB for chrissakes!?? Not a criminal conspiracy that killed thousands and thousands of people, ruined the US economy, and destroyed the world's opinion of the US like say... THE IRAQ WAR! FUCK! Quote
olyclimber Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 BUT THERE ARE EVIL PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO WILL TAKE AWAY YOUR FREEDOMS!!! thank god ....the world is so much safer now than it was before. Quote
EWolfe Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Where are the angry people with guns? Whoops! I meant domestically. Quote
G-spotter Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Where are the angry people with guns? They mostly got banned. Now they post on ascensionist.com Quote
Skeezix Posted April 4, 2006 Author Posted April 4, 2006 Took almost a full year for his sleazy self to fall. The wheels of justice... Bye bye Tom. Good luck with the new career as a lobbyist... Quote
Alpinfox Posted April 4, 2006 Posted April 4, 2006 Good luck with the new career as a lobbyist... Hopefully his internship as Prison Bitch works out first. I think he'd learn a lot of skills that would be useful as a lobbyist. Quote
JoshK Posted April 5, 2006 Posted April 5, 2006 KK, F'weather and the like are total fucking idiots. A year later and none of them even post anymore. Every idiotic thing they argued for has fallen flat on its face. Please grace us once more with your presence and let us hear what you have to say for yourselves today. Quote
Punter Posted April 5, 2006 Posted April 5, 2006 Tom Delay is an idiot. I'm not really sure why people were so threatened by him though. As for KK and F'weather...I don't know if they are as JoshK says "total fucking idiots". What do you say KK. Are you? JoshK sounds like he'd like to meet you out at the woodshed. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted April 5, 2006 Posted April 5, 2006 Tom Delay is an idiot. I'm not really sure why people were so threatened by him though. As for KK and F'weather...I don't know if they are as JoshK says "total fucking idiots". What do you say KK. Are you? JoshK sounds like he'd like to meet you out at the woodshed. I'm sure JoshK is a snivelling wuss in real life, who feels comfortable hiding behind his ISP in anonymous safety. What that half-wit turd says about me is completely irrelevant - as is he. Quote
JoshK Posted April 5, 2006 Posted April 5, 2006 I think plenty of people on this board know me, know I don't hide behind an IP, and know where to find me. It's your conservative kicked-as-a-child beta-male ass that posts behind a fake name, after all. Now, what say you, KK, for yourself? It's a year later and your band of crooks is quickly crumbling. Don't you have anything to add to edumacate us liberals on why everything is going according to plan? Quote
Dave_Schuldt Posted April 6, 2006 Posted April 6, 2006 NEXT STOP JAIL BITCH! 2 of his aids turned so I think he's and I'm stoked! Quote
Squid Posted April 6, 2006 Posted April 6, 2006 Tom Delay is an idiot. I'm not really sure why people were so threatened by him though. What part of the subversion of democracy doesn't threaten you? Are you so unpatriotic that civil servants on the take doesn't bother you? Quote
Punter Posted April 6, 2006 Posted April 6, 2006 Squid: I may not be entirely up to date on the case but last time I read about it (it's been a couple of months - snore) looked like he had violated a TEXAS campaign law. I am not even sure I have a problem with the redistricting of TX at this point. I personally felt much more outrage towards the Randy Cunningham ,William J. Jefferson and Robert W. Ney scandals. Maybe those guys just aren't has easy to hate as Delay is?? Quote
JoshK Posted April 6, 2006 Posted April 6, 2006 No problem with the Texas redistricting? Umm...ok, i guess you aren't easy to upset. Quote
EWolfe Posted April 6, 2006 Posted April 6, 2006 Note to self: killing, invading, and corporate stealing is more ok than a blowjob. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.