Phil K

Charts?

Did you watch the video he posted? Try it, then share your rebuttal with the group.

Yeah Bill, get with the program. It couldn't be true..... because FW says it couldn't. He doesn't even have to look at any of the links, and obviously knows more than all those nutty architects and engineers. OK, now it's time to attack me personally. I've said it before, I'll say it again. I don't see how 9/11 could have been pulled off as a pre-planned conspiracy. It just blows the mind to think that that many people were fooled and that many were complicit. But go youtube Building 7 and tell me how that happened.

Prole's Baseball Threads are the only one's I enjoy. Go Mariners! And take the Seahawks with you. Can we have our tax dollars back?

Or at least REALLY bad at science.

Hey, is it too late to thank the mods/gods for fixing my avatar? Thanks

That does it! I'm moving this thread to Spray.

I suspect that AZRR knows full well about the fatality last summer. From my limited experience with the area, I'd say: Sure, it's a long haul into Grizzly Creek any way you cut it. Navigating the valley bottom will be interesting, but do-able; we were able to follow game trails through some of the brush, much to the surprise of some of the sizable local bear population. Trying to gain the ridge will be a puzzle that will probably only be solvable once you get into the upper valley. The green and cliffy areas on the photo above are steep and rugged, though weaknesses exist. Where the red line, proposed route, turns north and traverses gulleys, ridges, and notches looks very problematic. Then the real fun starts. As others have mentioned above, dropping down the Goode-SK col could be troublesome. I'd suggest having a double rope rappel available. When I was there w/ Heienrich (early July 2001?) it was pretty nearly a full 60m from the snow to the col, and very loose; I wouldn't count on good anchors, and downclimbing would be a nightmare. We may have a good snowpack which could help, or recession may have made the descent longer. All in all, it sounds like quite the adventure, and I wish you all the luck.

PM one of the mods, but I don't think so. A while back I wanted to loose the dorky ALLCAPS (mistake) in my avatar name, and it was a no go then. If it's possible now, sign me up.

That's the most inspiring video I've seen since the infamous Turkey Pardoning/Beheading.

Only on bicyclists who refuse to stay on the sidewalk.

They aren't very hardworkers though, you fascistic neanderthal thug. Soon they'll be wanting cell phones with unlimited text messaging.

Happy Holidays, libtards. I just couldn't help wondering......

It will be interesting to see how they work out shared duties betwixt Tyler and his new teammate, former Green Jersey and current World Champion, Thor Hushoved. Two top contenders with similar but slightly different strengths; Tyler's probably got more pure speed, but Thor's proven himself in tough conditions and uphill sprints. I don't see either one of them becoming designated lead out men. If they cooperate well, the new team should get some impressive results.

Clarence Thomas likes 'em!

Informative, but not exactly Safe For Work....

I ask myself this every time I see you post. OUCH, that ain't gonna buff out!

Race to the bottom! Ready, set...... go, you overpaid suckers.

Considering the fact that everything possible was done to set this up and edit the footage to make her look all rugged 'n outdoorsey.....

This is what has been puzzling me quite a bit lately. Most of our resident regressives are not outright monsters on the order of say, Pol Pot or Dick Cheney, and they aren't flat-out stoopid like yer typical teabagger, or even Missy O'Donnell, so what drives their particular ideology? I've given up on trying to have a reasoned discussion with their ilk, because it only ever seems to result in lies, personal attacks, tangential and misleading responses, or, my personal favorite, suggestions to Lick Sack. Like that settles anything. Where does that deep seated resentment of so many other people come from? What's so effing threatening about someone making a modest yet decent living driving a bus, pushing papers for the gummint, or heavens forbid, dependent on public assistance for some of their basic needs like healthcare? I'll bet everyone here bitching and moaning about cutting their taxes doesn't find it too hard maintain a decent standard or living, and has enough left over to fill up their gas tank for a weekend in the mountains equipped with a few thousand dollars worth of outdoor gear. And all the while they think that they are pulling for people who want to help lower their taxes, the top %5 of the income pyramid is gobbling up bigger and bigger chunks of everything in sight, making damn sure that their taxes go down by a king's ransom, and shifting the tax burden down to the middle class suckers who believe their propaganda. Meanwhile, if you happen to be poor, old, sick, unemployed, or some other unimportant looser, tough shit. You should have made better choices, eh?

"I think J_B was taking issue with the impact illegal immigrants have on representation in congress. States with large populations of illegal immigrants receive a disproportionate number of seats in the House of Representatives because noncitizens are included with citizens." Ya'know, if you regressives weren't so wrong on every point, you might not need to lie so freaking much. I seem to recall that House seats are apportioned according to the latest census; we're still working under figures from 2000. And you're telling me that hordes of illegal brown people reported themselves to the 2000 census takers so that they can have more representation in Congress? 'Don't think so. How about this for skewed representation? Because each state gets two Senators regardless of population, via the unprecedented obstruction by the current minority party in the Senate (and yes, the spineless response from the majority), about %18 of the population's representatives get to squash any legislation that they choose to. Why do you people hate America so much?

Jason- you cut your hair!

Try reading the next two paragraphs, and the truthiness changes substantially. Not that that's relevant. "Republican-leaning third-party groups, however, many of them financed by large, unrestricted donations that are not publicly disclosed, have swarmed into the breach, pouring more than $60 million into competitive races since July, about 80 percent more than the Democratic-leaning groups have reported spending. As a result, the battle for control of the House has been increasingly shaping up as a test of whether a Democratic fund-raising edge, powered by the advantages of incumbency but accumulated in the smaller increments allowed by campaign finance law, can withstand the continuing deluge of spending by groups able to operate outside those limits, according to an analysis of political spending by The Times." Next lie?

Let's go kick some towel-heads asses! I'm signing up...... right after Nitrox.