I actually think it might be a better idea to let things deteriorate, that was my point on not paying passes more so than wallet protection as you put. The reason I say this is because if we pay this extra user fee and fund the maintenance of parking lots and shitters, then there isn't a problem to be fixed. By accepting to pay to use a public area (in this case parking and shitters) then it opens it up for more services to charge us for. What's next, entrance fees for trails or roads, or use fee for using a picnic areas, or how about charging to maintain a veiw point. By refusing to pay, the decision makers will hopefully be forced to make some type of corrective action for funding these items and will hopefully better budget the funds that are available for maintaining public lands. By refusing to pay for these things, it is a statement that is saying it is not acceptable to charge a user fee and we are not happy with essentially the privatization of our public lands. That statement shouldn't end there though, it should be just the start of letting your elected politicians know that you don't feel it is right targeting a user group for public services and that more reasonable ways of funding these services should be researched.