DirtyHarry Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 STFU, DH. That's better, you cocksucking pig fucker. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 I'll fuck a pig's ass raw, film it, and get a reality TV show about it, cuntz. Quote
DirtyHarry Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 If it was a reality show you'd have to like fuck ten different pigs then decide which on you wanted to marry. Quote
DirtyHarry Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 Shit, there's got to be a good Sarah Palin joke in there somewhere too. But that would be sooo 2008. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 Shit, there's got to be a good Sarah Palin joke in there somewhere too. who? Quote
j_b Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 First, conservatives compared Obama to a messiah, now they tell us he is no messiah as if the rest of us ever thought he was. Attributing to others your own ridiculous constructs to better demolish them, it's called a strawman argument. Quote
jmo Posted March 7, 2009 Author Posted March 7, 2009 Fox news is not the only source for articles like the original post. Not the change they voted for http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/233mrlvq.asp?pg=1 Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted March 7, 2009 Posted March 7, 2009 First, conservatives compared Obama to a messiah, now they tell us he is no messiah as if the rest of us ever thought he was. Attributing to others your own ridiculous constructs to better demolish them, it's called a strawman argument. True. I know a shit ton of liberals who voted Obama...some very strong supporters. Not one even remotely considers him any kind of Messiah, panacea, whatever. He's just a politician stuck with a very shitty job ahead of him, . Quote
Fairweather Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 First, conservatives compared Obama to a messiah, now they tell us he is no messiah as if the rest of us ever thought he was. Attributing to others your own ridiculous constructs to better demolish them, it's called a strawman argument. No. Conservatives lamented that his most ardent supporters were carrying on as if he were some sort of messiah--and many still do. Now reality is settling is and I think the cock is about to crow for a third time. Quote
ivan Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 I think the cock is about to crow for a third time. your cock crows? mine just throws up occasionally... Quote
DirtyHarry Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 [ No. Conservatives lamented that his most ardent supporters were carrying on as if he were some sort of messiah--and many still do. Isn't this what happens every time we elect a new President? Maybe part of that patriarchal / matriarchal aspect of human nature. Quote
The_Rooster Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 I think the cock is about to crow for a third time. How do you know???? Quote
Doug Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 First, conservatives compared Obama to a messiah, now they tell us he is no messiah as if the rest of us ever thought he was. Attributing to others your own ridiculous constructs to better demolish them, it's called a strawman argument. No. Conservatives lamented that his most ardent supporters were carrying on as if he were some sort of messiah--and many still do. Now reality is settling is and I think the cock is about to crow for a third time. My recollection is that the conservatives were excited about George W. Bush restoring dignity to the White House. Granted he didn't get caught getting a blow job from an intern, but the lack of accountability from his administration was anything but dignified. However, I don't believe Obama did anything to cultivate the perception of him being a messiah. Quote
Fairweather Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 However, I don't believe Obama did anything to cultivate the perception of him being a messiah. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 However, I don't believe Obama did anything to cultivate the perception of him being a messiah. That stage would have worked well in "Triumph of the Will" Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 (edited) However, I don't believe Obama did anything to cultivate the perception of him being a messiah. That stage would have worked well in "Triumph of the Will" Well, the RNC considered this set, but decided that it had too much potential for offending height challenged Druids. Edited March 9, 2009 by tvashtarkatena Quote
AlpineK Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 Lots of adoring fans here. Only a heartbeat away. [img:center]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Mh1TZAM-AWU/SLkD7Am7iXI/AAAAAAAABQc/KtdFApdqLiQ/s400/heartbeat.jpg[/img] [img:center]http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/ap_rnc_56_080904_ssh.jpg[/img] [img:center]http://www.theodoresworld.net/pics/0908/convention2008TuesdayImage2.jpg[/img] Of course there were a few nonbelievers. [img:center]http://www.dvafoto.com/wp-content/19-ms-rnc-policearrest.jpg[/img] Thank god that John, Sarah, and the RNC had backup. [img:center]http://www.dvafoto.com/wp-content/10-dwb-rnc-police.jpg[/img] Quote
pink Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 (edited) [video:youtube]VOCAzQyswO4 I LAUGHED SO HARD MY KIDNEY FELL OUT. Edited March 9, 2009 by pink Quote
Peter_Puget Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 He's brought the GOP back from the dead! After further review, I have found five key signs of economic growth, all of which I attribute entirely, or almost entirely, to President Obama. 1. Gun sales. The FBI reports background checks on the sale of firearms jumped 23 percent nationwide last month compared to February 2008. That follows a 28 percent rise in January and a 24 percent increase in December. 2. Advertising revenues on Rush Limbaugh's program. Rush Limbaugh’s audience is doubled and in January, his program had booked 80 percent of all 2008 revenue and "we'll be over 2008 by the end of this month." 3. Attendance at conservative political conventions. Turnout at CPAC was 9,000 this year, up from 7,000 last year, when the president and vice president and major presidential candidates were in attendance. 4. Ratings and advertising on CNBC: In the first two months of 2009, CNBC averaged 282,000 home viewers at any given time, up from 264,000 in the same period in 2008 and 233,000 in the same period in 2007. (CNBC says the Nielsen ratings undercounts its audience, as they do not measure out-of-home viewership on trading floors and offices.) 5. (ahem) Close to Home. "Circulation for the last issue of NR came in at a hair over 200,000. Our historic baseline for circulation is about 150,000, which is where it was at the beginning of 2007." linky Quote
pink Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 (edited) [video:youtube]vCWKjO4jpvE Edited March 9, 2009 by pink Quote
ivan Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 holy shit, speaking of the messiah, am i really seeing an advertisment for the anti-christ ann coulter at the bottom of the screen!?! can we airbrush a giant cum-shot onto her face please? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.