lI1|1! Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 God likes to have a shoved up his ass once in a while. Quote
sobo Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 See, I just lost my virginity at 48 to the good doctor with latex gloves. I'll send you the details in a PM. As he put it, "There is no discreet way to do this." I'm healthy. Thanks for asking. Hey, Bug, it's MORE THAN ENOUGH to know that you're healthy, buddy. I told my doctor "The least you can do is tell me you love me" I think they get that one alot, though. Had my second one a coupla months back. "Geez, Doc, ya got your whole arm in there?!" BTW, I'm healthy, too. Thanks for asking. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 The first time I had a woman. She was wearing a big diamond. I politely asked her if she planned to remove it beforehand. Quote
ericb Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 (edited) The first time I had a woman. She was wearing a big diamond. I politely asked her if she planned to remove it beforehand. Assuming it was on her ring finger, I guess it doesn't surprise me that she'd be able to get 2 or 3 fingers up there. Did you ask her to remove her watch as well? Edited January 4, 2008 by ericb Quote
Bug Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 I had a woman doctor last year who did not want to do it. Something about just having had her nails done. I promised not to clamp down and she scurried out of the room. Quote
Bug Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 So which did you prefer, the man or the woman? Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 That's kind of a funny question, because people are usually more comfortable with doctors of the same sex, except...well, this particular procedure kind of confuses the issue. BUTT... ...women have smaller fingers. Quote
sobo Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 ...I promised not to clamp down and she scurried out of the room. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Quote
minx Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 in a reflection of beautiful cc.com symmetry this thread has come full circle. Quote
AlpineK Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 Exactly. It took a little push, but now things are on the correct track. Quote
builder206 Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 It took a little push and everything came out fine Quote
AlpineK Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 No that would be thanks to me. Btw. Thanks to you you've proved beyond a reasonable doubt that you're a whiny little bitch. That would be alright if you were female, but you don't appear to be a woman. Quote
ivan Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 the little thread that could! the nodder is fucking going down! Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 Bennigsen's note and the Cossack's information that the left flank of the French was unguarded were merely final indications that it was necessary to order an attack, and it was fixed for the fifth of October. On the morning of the fourth of October Kutuzov signed the dispositions. Toll read them to Ermolov, asking him to attend to the further arrangements. "All right- all right. I haven't time just now," replied Ermolov, and left the hut. The dispositions drawn up by Toll were very good. As in the Austerlitz dispositions, it was written- though not in German this time: "The First Column will march here and here," "the Second Column will march there and there," and so on; and on paper, all these columns arrived at their places at the appointed time and destroyed the enemy. Everything had been admirably thought out as is usual in dispositions, and as is always the case, not a single column reached its place at the appointed time. When the necessary number of copies of the dispositions had been prepared, an officer was summoned and sent to deliver them to Ermolov to deal with. A young officer of the Horse Guards, Kutuzov's orderly, pleased at the importance of the mission entrusted to him, went to Ermolov's quarters. "Gone away," said Ermolov's orderly. The officer of the Horse Guards went to a general with whom Ermolov was often to be found. "No, and the general's out too." The officer, mounting his horse, rode off to someone else. "No, he's gone out." "If only they don't make me responsible for this delay! What a nuisance it is!" thought the officer, and he rode round the whole camp. One man said he had seen Ermolov ride past with some other generals, others said he must have returned home. The officer searched till six o'clock in the evening without even stopping to eat. Ermolov was nowhere to be found and no one knew where he was. The officer snatched a little food at a comrade's, and rode again to the vanguard to find Miloradovich. Miloradovich too was away, but here he was told that he had gone to a ball at General Kikin's and that Ermolov was probably there too. "But where is it?" "Why, there, over at Echkino," said a Cossack officer, pointing to a country house in the far distance. "What, outside our line?" "They've put two regiments as outposts, and they're having such a spree there, it's awful! Two bands and three sets of singers!" The officer rode out beyond our lines to Echkino. While still at a distance he heard as he rode the merry sounds of a soldier's dance song proceeding from the house. "In the meadows... in the meadows!" he heard, accompanied by whistling and the sound of a torban, drowned every now and then by shouts. These sounds made his spirits rise, but at the same time he was afraid that he would be blamed for not having executed sooner the important order entrusted to him. It was already past eight o'clock. He dismounted and went up into the porch of a large country house which had remained intact between the Russian and French forces. In the refreshment room and the hall, footmen were bustling about with wine and viands. Groups of singers stood outside the windows. The officer was admitted and immediately saw all the chief generals of the army together, and among them Ermolov's big imposing figure. They all had their coats unbuttoned and were standing in a semicircle with flushed and animated faces, laughing loudly. In the middle of the room a short handsome general with a red face was dancing the trepak with much spirit and agility. "Ha, ha, ha! Bravo, Nicholas Ivanych! Ha, ha, ha!" The officer felt that by arriving with important orders at such a moment he was doubly to blame, and he would have preferred to wait; but one of the generals espied him and, hearing what he had come about, informed Ermolov. Ermolov came forward with a frown on his face and, hearing what the officer had to say, took the papers from him without a word. "You think he went off just by chance?" said a comrade, who was on the staff that evening, to the officer of the Horse Guards, referring to Ermolov. "It was a trick. It was done on purpose to get Konovnitsyn into trouble. You'll see what a mess there'll be tomorrow." Quote
Bug Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 No that would be thanks to me. Btw. Thanks to you you've proved beyond a reasonable doubt that you're a whiny little bitch. That would be alright if you were female, but you don't appear to be a woman. So are you saying you didn't lock the thread? Or are you saying you were going to reopen it without being poked? Or just what are we supposed to thank you for you sniveling little Jesus fart? Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 No that would be thanks to me. Btw. Thanks to you you've proved beyond a reasonable doubt that you're a whiny little bitch. That would be alright if you were female, but you don't appear to be a woman. So are you saying you didn't lock the thread? Or are you saying you were going to reopen it without being poked? Or just what are we supposed to thank you for you sniveling little Jesus fart? dude, it's a goofy thread on a dumb forum. who cares if the moderator fucked with it? Quote
mike1 Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 I just googled "Denali Expedition 2008". Congrats, you guys are number 2! Way to represent... Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 I just googled "Denali Expedition 2008". Congrats, you guys are number 2! Way to represent... Number 2? How a propos... Quote
lizard_brain Posted January 6, 2008 Posted January 6, 2008 I just logged on to say that there's no fucking way I'm going to read this entire goddam thread. That is all. Do carry on. Quote
Bug Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 (edited) No that would be thanks to me. Btw. Thanks to you you've proved beyond a reasonable doubt that you're a whiny little bitch. That would be alright if you were female, but you don't appear to be a woman. So are you saying you didn't lock the thread? Or are you saying you were going to reopen it without being poked? Or just what are we supposed to thank you for you sniveling little Jesus fart? dude, it's a goofy thread on a dumb forum. who cares if the moderator fucked with it? It's all goofy and dumb. So why post here at all? So you are OK with letting Feck's little mind control what you read here? Why roll over? Seriously, why keep posting here if Feck is going to say, "This doesn't interest me. I'm going to lock it." Feck has no sense of what it means to have an open conversation. It's his way or bullshit in his view. It seems like you would have a problem with that since you sometimes border on behavior that has been banned here in the past. But maybe you are not really into freedom. Maybe you would really like to ban or censor anyone who does not agree with you. I find many of your posts offensive but I fire back at you and assume it is all in the name of open communications. The open communication, the freedom to express ourselves completely, this is what makes it worthwhile to post and participate here at all. If you do not like a thread, don't read it. Block people who just do not interest you. But lock a thread so nobody can continue discussing the theme? Why? That question has not been answered. Feck's defensive posts are evidence to me that I am right about why he locked the thread. I think he is embarassed by his public display of narrow minded reasoning. He has had nothing tangible to say as a defense. I talk about maintaining the freedom to freely express our opinions and beliefs and he says "you're whining". If I don't call him a mental midget for this, who will? But hey, why are you still reading this dumbshit? Edited January 7, 2008 by Bug Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.