Old_Man Posted February 18, 2003 Posted February 18, 2003 Looking for a lightweight pack to use for day "mountaineering" trips in the Cascades. Like to carry pickets and wands in side pockets, so it'll also need to have some wand pockets & side compression straps. Ought to be a top loader to handle some overloading at times (like slowshoes, or whatever), with a reasonable but not overkill waistbelt. Don't need the salesman's answer for all the bells and whistles either, that beats the competitors' models in terms of benefits & features. Rather...would like a purely functional and lightweight pack (less than 2-3 lbs??), that can carry gear and clothing...like what's needed on a cold weather less traveled/steeper route on Rainier. Doesn't have to be extremely comfortable, but then again, needs to handle the job for 15-20 hours. Any favorites out there? Gracias in advance! Quote
Winter Posted February 18, 2003 Posted February 18, 2003 I've been using the BD Ice Sack for awhile now and love it. I found a deal direct from BD ... a sale on old packs. They also make a smaller version that may be better for what you want. My girlfriend also looked at an Osprey this weekend that looked interesting ... but it also had almost too many whistles like the old Mountainsmith packs. Can't remember the model, but it was an alpine pack. Quote
COL._Von_Spanker Posted February 18, 2003 Posted February 18, 2003 I noticed on the opspreys that they would be difficult to carry wands and pickets on. I'm also looking for a small alpine pack that can be used for craggin, and alpine rock and ice climbing. so far I like the wild things Freny and Ice sack, and I want to check out the granite gear alpine lite. I have yet to determine exactly what volume will suit my needs the best. Quote
COL._Von_Spanker Posted February 18, 2003 Posted February 18, 2003 Hey cpt., can I give your Ice sac a test drive some time? I wanna see how it feels on a overnighter. Quote
Dru Posted February 18, 2003 Posted February 18, 2003 arcteryx nozone, or khamsin 52 or 38. really the 38 is more than adequate for day trippin. Quote
allthumbs Posted February 18, 2003 Posted February 18, 2003 hell, the 38's good enuf for 3 days under 30 lbs. Quote
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted February 18, 2003 Posted February 18, 2003 Khamsin 52 ! Carries like a dreamy Cadillac, too. Redefining "plush suspension." Quote
cjain Posted February 19, 2003 Posted February 19, 2003 I have both a Wild Things Ice Sac and a Serratus Icefall (from MEC www.mec.ca). For anything over a few pounds I much prefer the Icefall, mostly because it has 2 removable stays that allow it carry weight much better. Also I think the lid compartment of the Icefall is much better. Even though it is larger and has a frame (the stays) the Icefall weighs about the same as the Ice Sac and, if desired, you can save weight by taking the lid and stays off. I would guess that Ice Sac is more durable though. Oh, and the Icefall is half the cost of the Ice Sac. Quote
Distel32 Posted February 19, 2003 Posted February 19, 2003 Arcteryx bora 30 has worked pretty butter for me....also only paid 65 for it though....if you can scrounge up a little extra dough, dana designs bombpack takes the cake in my opinion Quote
max Posted February 19, 2003 Posted February 19, 2003 (less than 2-3 lbs??)...like what's needed on a cold weather less traveled/steeper route on Rainier. You're talking duffle bag at those wieghts and loads.... Quote
jordop Posted February 19, 2003 Posted February 19, 2003 Dr_Flash_Amazing said: Khamsin 52 ! Carries like a dreamy Cadillac, too. Redefining "plush suspension." Save $100 and get a MEC Icefall. It's lighter too and doesn't have that stupid pack-lid-into-fanny-pack crap thing that A't does. But I guess the Icefall doesn't have that "plush" hypalondynatechtra crampon patch though http://www.mec.ca/Products/product_detail.jsp?PRODUCT<>prd_id=15001&FOLDER<>folder_id=496963&bmUID=1045636852486 Quote
robert Posted February 19, 2003 Posted February 19, 2003 I really like my North Face Summit 45 for this type of trip. It would work for a light overnight, and can swallow a good deal of gear. The best feature for me is that it just feels so good when I wear it. Carries like a dream as someone said. Quote
Ibex Posted February 20, 2003 Posted February 20, 2003 Old_Man said: Looking for a lightweight pack to use for day "mountaineering" trips in the Cascades. Like to carry pickets and wands in side pockets, so it'll also need to have some wand pockets & side compression straps. Ought to be a top loader to handle some overloading at times (like slowshoes, or whatever), with a reasonable but not overkill waistbelt. Don't need the salesman's answer for all the bells and whistles either, that beats the competitors' models in terms of benefits & features. Rather...would like a purely functional and lightweight pack (less than 2-3 lbs??), that can carry gear and clothing...like what's needed on a cold weather less traveled/steeper route on Rainier. Doesn't have to be extremely comfortable, but then again, needs to handle the job for 15-20 hours. Any favorites out there? www.mchalepacks.com Somebody had to say it. Read on my friend and welcome to the promise land of backpacks.... http://www.cascadeclimbers.com/threadz/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB9&Number=69182&page=5&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1 Quote
tomcat Posted February 20, 2003 Posted February 20, 2003 For your purposes, I'd either go with a Wild Things Ice Sac or a Wild Things Andinista. They're both light, they both have lots of accessory loops and daisy chains, and they're very well made. I would go with the Andinista because of it's versatility (you can zip it down smaller for day trips). The weight difference is negligible between the Andinista and the Ice Sac considering the huge difference in volume between the two. Also if you haven't looked into LaFuma's packs, give them a look. I have the Baltoro 70 and I love it ... it's not light like the Andinista, but it's very comfortable, durable, and quite functional (minus the bells and whistles that the Wild Things packs offer). Things I like about the LaFuma : Well made (heavy fabric), 2 large [1.5 liter] water bottle pouches on each side, aluminum frame with arched construction and ample adjustability, the most comfortable pack I've ever carried, simple. Things I don't like about the LaFuma : It's too simple. The LaFuma doesn't have enough accessory loops for me .. it looks like it was designed to carry only a mountaineer's axe (not ice tools). In order to pack on bivvy gear, brain bucket, snowshoes, snow shovel, skis, ski poles, etc you pretty much need to bring an extra 60m rope with you to tie it on there with. Other than that it's a great pack. I have heard really good things about the Arc'teryx Khamsin series (my pops owns one), but have never personally carried one. Quote
IceIceBaby Posted February 20, 2003 Posted February 20, 2003 The Packs I own Wild things Icesac - my favorite short alpine/ice climbing trips Wild things Andinista - Great for long lightweight alpine trips Cold Cold world Chernobyl - my favorite overnight Ice climbing pack Arc’teryx NoZone - favorite long trails and bushwhacking approaches pack Dana Design Bighorn - the king of my long backpacking and long craging pack Dana Design Astralplane overkill - the Expedition base-camp load hauler Dana Design New World - my favorite (with the A5 astropack) rock climbing craging overnight friends staying pack I know this is excessive but that’s why I sold my 3 other packs I used to own Trango Alpine, Gregory Reality, Lowe Alpine contour IV Quote
cracked Posted February 20, 2003 Posted February 20, 2003 Do you have too much money? I get by with two: a homemade daypack (probably 2500-3000 ci), wt 1.3 lbs, and an Arc'teryx Khamsin 62. KISS. Quote
hasbeen Posted February 20, 2003 Posted February 20, 2003 Here's another vote for the Khamsin 52. It's simple (yes, even the lid/fanny pack is very straightforward and contrary to jordop, I use it a fair amount for trips out of a base camp). For the minimal suspension, it really does carry loads in the 20-45 lb. range very well. The only downside that I have been able to see after a few years with one is that it is pretty lightweight and can't take a lot of abuse. I like mine. Quote
pu Posted February 20, 2003 Posted February 20, 2003 Something to consider. I have used many of the packs that everyone has been talking up. I currently have a Mammut Extreme 45. It's da bomb. You can look at it at www.climbhigh.com Second bounce may be carrying them also. I can't remember. Quote
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted February 20, 2003 Posted February 20, 2003 hasbeen said: Here's another vote for the Khamsin 52. It's simple (yes, even the lid/fanny pack is very straightforward and contrary to jordop, I use it a fair amount for trips out of a base camp). For the minimal suspension, it really does carry loads in the 20-45 lb. range very well. The only downside that I have been able to see after a few years with one is that it is pretty lightweight and can't take a lot of abuse. I like mine. On closer inspection, it turns out DFA has a Khamsin 50, and his lid does not convert to a fanny pack. But the Khamsin the Doctor has is not the same as the ones they're putting out now. Seems to be a little less alpine-specific than the newer ones. Quote
allthumbs Posted February 20, 2003 Posted February 20, 2003 khamsin 50 is a girl's pack - designed for a woman's back; no wonder it fits you FDA. Quote
cracked Posted February 20, 2003 Posted February 20, 2003 Oh, c'mon Trask, you can do better than that. I like your auto-sig though. Quote
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted February 20, 2003 Posted February 20, 2003 trask said: [blah blah drivel drivel blah] Trask, Trask, Trask ... hopeless ... Quote
Winter Posted February 20, 2003 Posted February 20, 2003 Quick question: My girlfriend wants gear loops on her alpine pack. I generally put my hipbelt under my harness so I can use my harness loops but was wondering if folks see these as a key gadget. Quote
mattp Posted February 20, 2003 Posted February 20, 2003 Don't sweat the wand pocket if you find a pack that otherwise suits your needs. A Picket can easily be inserted beneath compression straps and locked on with a carabiner (better 2 of them) and for the relatively few times you will be carring wands, you can fashion a wand pocket by tieing a stuff sack on the side of your pack. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.