minx

has someone else already posted this? i'm having a deja vu moment. (and no i don't mean wearing a g-string on stage)super size it January 22, 2004 -- LAST February, Morgan Spurlock decided to become a gastronomical guinea pig. His mission: To eat three meals a day for 30 days at McDonald's and document the impact on his health. Scores of cheeseburgers, hundreds of fries and dozens of chocolate shakes later, the formerly strapping 6-foot-2 New Yorker - who started out at a healthy 185 pounds - had packed on 25 pounds. But his supersized shape was the least of his problems. Within a few days of beginning his drive-through diet, Spurlock, 33, was vomiting out the window of his car, and doctors who examined him were shocked at how rapidly Spurlock's entire body deteriorated. "It was really crazy - my body basically fell apart over the course of 30 days," Spurlock told The Post. His liver became toxic, his cholesterol shot up from a low 165 to 230, his libido flagged and he suffered headaches and depression.

nothing i hope. i just pointed it out b/c most political discussions occur in spray. since matt doesn't moderate spray he can't apply any "mocking moderation" here so i don't see what FW's problem is.

veggie, you and fairweather might both note that mattp doesn't moderate spray. in fact ehmmic doesn't moderate spray.

Don't confuse income tax with corporate tax. cbs- i am not confused. both are a fine way to generate revenue for the government.

i question Gen. Clark's background for dealing with domestic economic issues. Corporations are already shipping plenty of jobs overseas at an alarming rate. This might increase if their taxes were to go up as they would under Gen. Clark's proposition. Fewer jobs is a bad thing of the economy as a whole and the citizens as individuals regardless of their salary. i certainly am not opposed to expanded social programs, particularly universal health care. h/e we need the tax base to support these programs. Stifling job growth won't help improve the available money to fund these programs.

hey mr. droolalot- you can kiss my lilly white ass. i was making a point. i have not banned ANYBODY! not one single person including trask. trask contributed a lot of wit and humor. he also contributed and equal amount of pointless drivel that was on occasion offensive. and i'm damn near unoffendable. so SHUTTHEFUCKUP

i loathe myself for doing this but i just can't help it i have been interested in Gen. Clarke's candicacy for a while. he seems to have more background for dealing with foreign policy than any of the other dem. candidates. h/e, a michale moore endorsement does nothing to sway me toward him. i think M.M. has latched on to great ideas in the past and then run so far to the left w/his theories that he ruins valid arguments. so what if i don't have a million dollars? does that mean i should be any less interested in policies that affect my bottom line? i consider myself successful despite my lack of a 7 figure income. BUT to distel's comment. There is nothing yet that makes me think charging into Iraq was anything but a personal agenda for Shrub. I'm pleased to see any candidate that understands this.

hey in my work i strive to be consistent!

how many people do you think have been banned lately? what do you think they've been banned for doing? strident opinions won't get you banned or even moderated, especially in spray. how much moderation do you think is going on in this forum? answer-VERY VERY VERY LITTLE. other forums definitely have tighter behaviour requirements AS THEY SHOULD! pointless vulgarity will get your post deleted. repeated offenses might get you banned. MIGHT and not by me. opening spray and having to go talk to my boss or HR becaue of something that was posted is REALLY irritating. Particulary if it was posted for shock value. Face it sprayers, you're not shocking anyone any more. IN CLOSING: SHUT UP AND QUIT WHINING ABOUT STUFF THAT ISN'T HAPPENING. GO WHINE TO YOUR IMAGINARY FRIENDS B/C THEY'RE THE ONES WHO ARE GETTING BANNED

i would just like to say to all of you whining about banning and shit. stFUCKu

yes patagonia is also acceptable attire for spewing beta.

i thought he was on the George Shrubya e-mail list, each day it tells him what was happening and what he should think about it.

there's a lot of discussion of current events in spray. most of you just post mindless drivel that i would expect from sprayers like myself. h/e a few of you post insightful remarks. i'm curious what news sources people around here rely on for their info.

"It's wilder than a friday night scrabble game in spray. The weak need not apply. "? or "Abandon Hope All Ye Who Enter Here". ? ah just skip the undies

He's the yin to your yang Maybe you guys could get together for some crab and a hot tub. (and yes, it is official, he has been banned). that's a visual i just did not need~!

Nancy Pelosi, the female Al "Woodenhead" Gore. that's it. house minority leader? she was awful. those eyes of hers are creepy.

what was with the woman who did the democratic rebuttal? she was horrible. ruined a perfectly good message and almost made me embarrassed to vote democrat!

yeah...not til i get my taxes done. some things are unavoidable

that was our key measure of friendship in college. but then again i don't puke. i don't like anyone well enough to hold their hair while they puke.

we're thinking about a trip there in march. what's the best book to pick up?

i do not puke

i always take the word of a hypnotist over evaluating all the evidence

just a point. non climbing related topics does not necessarily equal offensive posts with absolutely no content other than vulgarity

yeah FW offered me a new #3 and $50 to mess with CBS's post.

i have to stay home tonight. i've gotta do some laundry saturday and sunday will be some combo of skiing, climbing, drinking, playing and whatnot