minx

i'll go one step further than jim. i'm going to point out that projections are often wrong (ie. the new medicare bill) and then i'll attack the man (Shrub is a lying kiebler elf)

hey roark...stfu it was an hour, i don't consider it a waste. he has some good ideas. nothing wasteful about gaining some new perspective is there?

well i spent about an hour of my valuable time listening to Dennis Kucinich last night i have absolutely no hope that he will be elected president he is the best of the democratic candidates that i've heard. i do not agree with or support at least one of his platform items. that said, he had a lot of interesting ideas. he had proposals for funding his programs. most importantly, he seemed to have a genuine belief in what he was saying. he's the only one who seemed genuine and sincere in his desire to change things and help people. many of his ideas are extreme changes from things as usual and unlikely to succeed with in the confines of the entire government. i think it would do this country a world of good to have a president who is idealistic and would focus on achieving those changes. he would probably fail to fully reach those goals but i'd love to see someone make a legit effort to provoke significant change in healthcare, education and trade. he's not a charismatic speaker. he's probably to unattractive to be president. he's the only candidate that seems genuine at all....maybe it's the bad hair cut and spock ears.

I hope you left. "....she was in playboy's girls of the pac 10 issue." i never bothered to show up

well i'm not a man but this sorta sucked way back when "my ex g/f works here, hope you don't mind if she serves us"

heh! nope...they just cut my cube in half. now i have a study carol like the library used to have

i'm lookin at my swingline right now!

shuddap Bob!

it looks like i'm going to have lots of time to climb midweek. anybody out there available midweek stuff? alpine? cragging? whatever

I know you Mr. Roark, you love hanging out at the mall. Wandering through Nordstroms, The Bon, and lets not forget, Bath and Body Works!! Well, good quality loofah sponges are important to me. hey mr. roark only wants the finest clothes to wash when he's doing laundry

what he said!!!!

yeah....figures. one shot wonder i'm pretty sure kucinich doesn't blow goats since he's a vegetarian. but that's beside the point. i've heard him say some interesting things. just wondering if anybody here had done any research on the man.

roark at least live up to your pseudonym and try and come up w/at least one rational, logical, useful statement today.

Damn, that's news to me. What a provocative idea, that the all the misogynistic characteristics of the Church were decended from a simple case of jealousy. yeah that sounds just about right. par for the course if you ask me

anyone have any interesting info, thoughts, comments about the man?

Actually, CBS, there is a First Law of something-or-other that says that matter can neither be created or destroyed. This basically says that you can't create something from nothing. Energy doesn't come from nowhere, it is made by burning coal, or oil, or the sun's radiation, etc. Any science geek's have the actual name of what I am thinking of? I want to say First Law of Thermodynamics, but I don't think that's right. Check this out on the First Law of Thermo: geek info. Roark roark that's the first useful thing you've said in this thread. good job. I told you to shut up a few pages back. I thought it was useful, but it didn't take. Roark yeah and you're someone i really listen too

Actually, CBS, there is a First Law of something-or-other that says that matter can neither be created or destroyed. This basically says that you can't create something from nothing. Energy doesn't come from nowhere, it is made by burning coal, or oil, or the sun's radiation, etc. Any science geek's have the actual name of what I am thinking of? I want to say First Law of Thermodynamics, but I don't think that's right. Check this out on the First Law of Thermo: geek info. Roark roark that's the first useful thing you've said in this thread. good job.

ohmyfuckingdog! i can't believe you guys are still going at this. nothing new has been said about evolution or creationism in at least the last 40 posts! and i just read the whole damn thing!

now this is quality "spray"

it is difficult to prove a negative. it is also difficult to have a discussion with someone whose "pro" argument reverts to "because the bible says so"

hey doing my part to make sure that someday we can have imax pron and we can all say erectile dysfunction w/o blushing.

hey i already admitted that i'm in a really really PISSY mood today. was it just me or was the sound quality unbelievably bad for the game. not that i imagine i was missing anything but the announcers were nearly inaudible.

i said "THERES" millions not THREE million. i apologize for forgetting the apostrophe. i'm pissy today and breasts just don't seem worthy of getting our knickers in a knot over. maybe i need some of that imax pron that BV mentioned.

FERDOGSAKE PEOPLE - IT'S A BREAST! THERES MILLIONS OF THEM IN THIS STATE ALONE! GET OVER IT

i think comparing and contrasting ideas is an outstanding way to teach children. unfortunately, it seems to be the idea of many people that you can't present different ideas ie. evolution and creationism in the same classroom. it seems that they want to present one or the other. i am opposed to teaching creationism in the classroom b/c i believe it crosses the religion in schools line. h/e i'm not opposed to comaring and contrasting different concepts (darwin v. lamarck) this can easily be done w/o dragging in "god" by presenting the idea and the evidence that supports it. comparing and contrasting is a great way to teach people to think critically. ideas like the string theory have a place in the classroom b/c they are based on underlying fundamentals. the string theory wasn't pulled out of thin air. it was based on physics and mathematics. it is one possible explanation drawn from things already in evidence. it has some LOGICAL FOUNDATION and there is potential that enough data can be garnered to move it from theory to fact.