ivan

i wanted to put a bullet between the eyes of every panda that wouldn't screw to save its species i wanted to open the dump valves on oiltankers and smother all those fancy french beaches i'd never see i wanted to breathe smoke i wanted to fuck up something beautiful

bill, i'm certainly game as i'm outta work at 3 most days ('specially since i got a slave, er, student-teacher, for 6 more weeks). i'll probalby be preferring to go to the o-o-o-god-zone more frequently as it's closer to camas, but when i can't find a partner i'll be there...

me having an opinion on this is similiar to an ameoba having an opinion on marxist-leninism - it's a matter of concern for an entirely different order of creature, and thus i'm benignly indifferent - it's kinda fun to hear a bunch of other folks get excited about it though, and it'd certainly be awesome to have seen it done in person

yo tambien

alpine = multi-pitch w/ a view of something w/ snow on it

huh?

sure...show off!

sex snorkel!

so how was it joe? watcha do?

i wanna date an emo-girl

and if you doubted his true americaness, he can certainly curse like a drunken bostoner

it is kinda nauseting to see a mccain kiss the ass of the man who sicked the rove-n-ator on him in 2000 - i'd like to know/hear what he was really thinking sharing the stage w/ him...

wouldn't canada still be damn competitive though?

a serious question, having not (that'll admit anyway) worn undies like that - wouldn't that shit be like super annoying? looks like i'd constantly be fishing around in my crack trying to do some major extraction...

i hate all posters equally, but each in their own unique way

Stuck? I love hanging out with my son. and clearly dave hates his

were galadriel and arwen whores? if so, what does this indicate about the socio-political values of the late third age of middle earth from a marxist perspective? to what extent are the opinions of raging queers pertinent in the overall dichotomy? oh that's easy. that was a question on one of my history finals in college. yes, they were whores. it was important to have a viable skill in order to provide for yourself. if you're going to do something you might as well be good at it. it says that the socio-political values haven't changed much at all. you can still sell sex for money in damn near every culture. and regardless of the particular dogma, politicians are generally whores that will sell themselves to the highest bidder. the currency for the transaction isn't always cash. the opinions of raging queers is just as pertinent as serene queers to the overall dichotomy. nice n' concise. so how come it took 8 pages to get to it then?

were galadriel and arwen whores? if so, what does this indicate about the socio-political values of the late third age of middle earth from a marxist perspective? to what extent are the opinions of raging queers pertinent in the overall dichotomy?

i assumed you weren't pro-slavery. my pt is, why argue over the #? it's the idea that's important, at least in terms of evaluating john brown (and yeah, i know the "hacked" is still in use, it's in my high school text too). the fact is, millions of africans endured a nightmare of slavery very much like the jewish holocaust, and for much longer. therefore, slavery was a system to be justly destroyed. further, in the USA, it was not a system that could be peacefully destroyed. finally, any person who undertook its destruction (like brown) can not justly be described as a terrorist w/o distorting the meaning of the word such that its unuseful in conversation. it's the old "insurgent" vs "freedom fighter" debate.

wow - n side looks beautiful - anyone gotten on one the gullies?

guess that means you don't have to use your priest anymore mike? he ALWAYS came looking after 24 hours

uh, am i missing your point? is your dithering over a # of africans actually killed being done b/c you actually thought slavery was okay? are you one of my sunny southern friends from the old days, raised on gone w/ the wind and the uncle remus stories who actually think the "peculiar institution" WASN'T a monstrous wrong?

You mean like when he and his sons hacked to death 5 fellow human beings in Pottawatomie, Kansas? Yes; I would say that made him a terrorist--which is why he was hung. funny - just read a book called "lies my teacher told me" that contains a chapter that examines the evolution of history textbooks treatment of brown - it notes that the very verb you used "hacked to death" was universally adopted by all high school textbooks in the '20s as textbook companies bowed to southern pressures and began transforming the protrayal of brown common in the 19th century as a martyr and "freedom fighter" to a crazed, murderous lunatic who "hacked to death" the apparent good guys, who wished the terrorism of slavery to be further propagated throughout the union brown's attack was a tit-for-tat response to a much worse raid and act of butchery on the part of pro-slavery forces just days earlier - you might recall kansas was having its own mini-civil war then and its wrong to consider brown's killings outside of the larger pattern of chaos and murder that embroiled the entire territory. history acutally appears to indicate that the majority of the bloodshed in the conflict was on the side of the pro-slavery types, not brown and the other anti-slavery men, though the harsh depiction still is heaped on brown. how was brown not a martyr and freedom fighter? he was strongly opposed to a far more clearly evil thing than urban sprawl or deforestation. he was a hero of the civil war, and union men marching into battle all knew and sung "john brown's body." do you disagree with his view of slavery? do you really think his plan at harpers ferry to incite a regional slave insurrection was wrong, given the political reality that slavery could not be abolished using the political process, but only through killing and bloodshed? if you do agree that he though was right, and he was doing it correctly, are you saying then that "terrorists" can be GOOD guys, and if so, where does that leave the word?

our glorious 2nd amendment certainly will keep the evil-doers at bay

these chix would all be much hotter if they were leading, no? the tr just adds to their vacuousness...