ivan

jeebus dude! can you like, please not die and shit?

Where in Iraq did you get this information? 'Cause I have a little experience with the place. how about afghanistan? we admitted last week to fucking up and killing 9 afghan soldiers.

seriously! my kids made me fucking insane last night - why are my 5 and 3 year olds already acting like they're in fucking college!?! sleeping till 10 in the morning, never sleeping alone, and never sleeping an earlier than 11 p.m., and not w/o good reason!?!

nice - though seems too fast a pace to properly enjoy so fine a night night climbing and gym workouts were what i had to resort to during the very early days of my 2 kids lives

solo or w/ somebody? my last trip up the corner in the dark i was drunk as a lord and had a blast. ave, beacon!

like proffesional bowling?

perhaps b/c there is no truth, just a bunch of yahoos yammering and yelling at each other through teh intretubes?

that's like, your opinion, man.

naw, that was the SA

hitler sure could do some amazing speeches, but o'bama will never be able to reproduce the sweet adolph comb-over

barry o'bama's infomericial was at least better than ross perot's! wierd bill - you and i voted for the same guy this year i imagine i probably did it for another reason though... i get a supermodel blowjob if he actually wins?!? holy shit, i mighta done tried to persuade some other folks to go my way!

certainly the wierdiest final game of a world series

not possible - he appeared in playboy magazine (w/ his clothes on, thank phuck) - any cat cool enough to get into the real mansion is clearly having too much fun in life to earn the worst ever prize

dude - no way! jimmy was a swinging bachelor and was using the white house as his personal swinger's pad - he clearly was having too much fun to be "worst ever"

the one having the least fun? would have to be "silent cal" coolidge i'd imagine maybe millard fillmore - goddamn, w/ a name like millard you have to be one moopy-fuck!

you do like to assume, dontcha actually, i'm a cracker meself, bred n' buggered in the south and spent much of my life back there drunk as a skunk, stumbling 'round civil war battlefields (it passed for adventure in a very flat land) i've never understood the splitting of hairs that goes on over the civil war origins - yes, to be precise, the origin of the war was in economics and property rights, but as the property in question, and the engine of the southern economy WAS slavery, it seems a pretty pointless distinction. of course the damn yankees were bigots too, but that didn't mean they approved of slavery - lincoln's party was incredibly clear on desire to halt the spread of slavery, and that was clearly the reason for the initial wave of southern secessions in 1860-1. at any rate, the parallel to today is a fair one. 1860's crackers fought for a system that wasn't working for them b/c they liked the dream of being one of the select few that it did enrich - same as 2008 crackers (though the jesus is on the gop's side is a wee bit different)

this was the same reason why the same rednecks fought for the right to have slaves when NONE OF THE POOR CRACKERS HAD SLAVES funny how shit don't change?

if you don't support felons and isane folks getting guns, then you necessarily can't support the status quo, which allows it

remember the meaning of life, from "the meaning of life?"

no weapon rights in the magna carta regretably, but it does talk a great deal about scutage!

was spending some time today at www.vote-smart.org on an activity w/ my seniors and encountered this relevant nugget from michael delavar, the republican opposing bryan baird for congress is the 3rd district - this comes from their "political courage test" which is very interesting and goddamit it'd be nice if all the candidates for all races would fill the damn things out anyhow, on the part of the test related to guns, he votes to get rid of ALL restrictions on weapons, and wrote this nice little note:

holy shit - the tax rate on the upper income tier used to be 94%! this is a good extract from the article: umm...sounds like a no-brainer for all the po'folk like me - now why can't all the other rednecks dig on this?

it's the wild-west around here, esse - pretty much anything goes 'cept threatening folks, as it should be. as noted, calling folks poo-poo heads can lose your posts style points, but on rare occasions it does add to their hilarity. in the end, it's not like you're gonna change anybody's mind, so you might as well have some fun w/ the assholes, no?

tell me more. where is it?