I am one of those old climbers who "......" but I disagree with your stance on bolting well as your lumping of me into a group that "does not care".
Bolting sucks as far as I am concerned.
It is permanent and will someday be un-neccessary. People like Rumr who are damn good climbers should be more careful about wantonly advocating it, or dismissing it imo. They are capable of climbing way more than most in traditional style. And it would be more sustainable environmentally if people LIKE this were more outspoken about striving for cleaner style.
So why do I disagree with you?
We need more people to get outside and value "nature" for what it is. If bolting provides the stimulus and or avenue for that to happen then it is still a small price to pay compared to dirt bikes at Vantage, 4-wheelers on top of Index, etc.
One step at a time.
Sad I know. Machivellian even. But to a far lesser extent than most outdoor alternatives of recent US vintage. Political power will become more and more important as the population continues to explode. We need more people who value the outdoors and bolting is a clear draw for huge numbers.
I stood out against bolting in the Bitterroots in the 80's and lost friends over it (not my choice but theirs). The bolts came anyway but the crowds still have not followed. The crowds still go to Lolo domes and other "bumper-belay" areas. These are areas that have already been logged, mined , and roaded.
Some of the bolts in the Bitterroot have since dissappeared. Some have yet to be removed. Some will stay as they provide the only safe way to protect sections of long routes.
Mill Creek is a sportclimber's heaven except that you have to walk a mile or two, and it is up hill.
The point is, Wilderness has remained wilderness while mega masses have taken up sport climbing. I think that will generally continue to be the case.