Thanks, Teddy.  I agree that, upon reading the law and the excerpts from the Boston Globe article, it seems like Kerry's meeting could have been in violation of that law.  However, Kerry has never been tried and never convicted of breaking the law in this case.  Has anyone ever been? 
  
To me, the law is much too broadly worded and deserves to be broken.  If I sent an email to saddam@iraq.com a couple years ago, telling him that he better let in those weapons inspectors or else we'd tear down his pretty statues, I could be prosecuted for attempting to "influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States."  Since I obviously have no official capacity within the US government (and neither did Kerry in 1971), my "correspondence" carries no legal weight, and certainly couldn't be construed to be the official policy of the US. 
  
Kerry did nothing wrong in talking with the North Vietnamese and trying to influence his government to negotiate with them.  He wanted to end the war, which wasn't going well for America.  One of the provisions of the "treaty" proposed by the VVAW was that all US POWs would be immediately released back to the US.  That sounds like a vote of support for our soldiers and airmen.