Necronomicon Posted September 18, 2002 Author Posted September 18, 2002 Neither perverted, nor liberal. Liberal is SOOO Right-Wing, and "perversion" doesn't being to describe the churning blackness of my mind. Quote
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 ... touching the void ... ... churning in the wake ... Â Page top again, you pansy tools! Â Â [ 09-18-2002, 02:24 PM: Message edited by: Dr Flash Amazing ] Quote
RobBob Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 ...well I'm outa this maelstrom and headin' back into the physical world. Quote
allthumbs Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 "Help me, I've fallen into this silly thread and I can't get out...." Quote
sexual_chocolate Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 "It's a very good question. Basically it comes down to the fact that while it it not permissible to be an initiating aggressor, once one is attacked it is permissible to defend oneself even if this means offensive actions." Â There's a problem here, of course. Who attacked who first? Hatfields and McCoys. Â Violence is the most naive response to violence; it just keeps the cycle intact. But I think that's what alot want, anyways. Quote
iain Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 quote: Originally posted by RobBob: ... headin' back into the physical world. That's what you think. You guys have nothing on muironsaturday. Nobody throws it down like Scott'door Research. It's at least 45 pages (and due to reopen for the anniversary shortly, I'm sure) Quote
allthumbs Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 As the riders loped on by him, he heard one call his name 'If you want to save your soul from hell, you’re ridin’ on that range then cowboy, change your ways today……or with us you’ll ride on tryin’ to catch the devil’s herd across the endless sky' Yippee-I-Yay (Yippee-I-Yay) Yippee-I-Yo (Yippee-I-Yo) Ghost Riders in the Sky Quote
Guest Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 "you tell him I'm comin and hell's comin with me" Quote
Paco Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 iain, those are some crazy dudes. Sure to do a lot of spancering. Â Can you be spancerd by HORSECOCK Sign me up! Quote
sk Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 LMAO...Iain you made me laugh so hard my side hurts Quote
Greg_W Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 I was doing very well at forgetting that part of the '80's, thank you very much. Quote
rbw1966 Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 Rumor has it that Wild Country is making a pack with folded linoleum as a back support for those spontaneous moments of breakin' Â Thats fresh! Quote
Necronomicon Posted September 18, 2002 Author Posted September 18, 2002 Turbo looks pretty spancered, almost spancered enough to do head-spins on the ceiling. Quote
MtnGoat Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 "Violence is the most naive response to violence; it just keeps the cycle intact." Â I see. So people about to be killed should not be naive, just dead, lest they continue the cycle. Â Whenever someone tells me violence is naive or ineffective, I ask them what they suggest a woman about to be raped do. Or a man about to be beaten. Just how far to giving up one's life and rights to an assailant, does this deeply held belief in naivete of violence extend? Â The "cycle" of violence as a reality everywhere, is a load. Sometimes there are cycles, sometimes there are not. Sometimes violence is appropriate and the only option, sometimes not. Saying violence is naive is in itself as naive as naive gets, IMO. Like everything else, it depends on the conditions surrounding it. Â "But I think that's what alot want, anyways." Â I'm sure that's what you think, but thinking others want something, in the place of knowing what they want, because it makes a nice argument is a very, very common assertion. Â Perhaps you can tell us who in *their* own words wants violence to continue. Not *your* assertion, not another third party about yet another third party. I am not interested in interpretations by someone of someone elses behavior, who claims to know what they want. Quote
iain Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 rbw here's that pack in action. serious offwidth stemmin' action that is. Â Â [ 09-18-2002, 03:32 PM: Message edited by: iain ] Quote
iain Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 Â [ 09-18-2002, 03:31 PM: Message edited by: iain ] Quote
j_b Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 "It's a very good question. Basically it comes down to the fact that while it it not permissible to be an initiating aggressor, once one is attacked it is permissible to defend oneself even if this means offensive actions." Â I am curious too! who was the 'initiating aggressor'? Quote
RobBob Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 I was playing radio roulette on the way to work this morning, and now I want to know: Just what the hell is"gangsta lovin'?" Quote
Paco Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 quote: Originally posted by iain: rbw here's that pack in action. serious offwidth stemmin' action that is. Â SOOOOOWWWWWWWWWEEEEEEETTTTT!!!!!! Â I need to get me one of those. Quote
Dru Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 I took up home canning Whoop Ass. I bought the equipment from Walmart, a Ronco Whoop Ass Canner for $66.69 and a 20pack of cans for $5.83. But I can't find wild STFU growing anywhere so I have substituted with Bitch Slap. Anyone want a nice Bitch Slap I got plenty canned and ready for ya. Quote
allthumbs Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 yeah, Fence Sitter's into that shit .... give em' a buzz Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.