Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

White zinc oxide used to be the standard years ago. Don't know if it's still around, but if so, it's absolute total sunblock. Looks like white clown greasepaint.

Posted

 

It sounds a little gross, but diaper ointment works really well.

 

rite-aid-ointment.jpg

 

It contains zinc oxide and is much cheaper than the outdoor sports-formulated stuff

 

Posted

what Hugh said... the best sunscreen is a tan. For actual sunscreen, don't bother with SPF 50 - once you get past SPF 15 the differences are negligable in the real world. Get some SPF 15 and re-apply every hour or two between 10AM and 4PM. It's not complicated.

 

Don't listen to the morons who scream about skin cancer - the benefits of Vitamin D far outweigh the costs of UV radiation. Check out Australia, which has the highest rate of skin cancer in the world, but the lowest rate of cancer, overall.

Posted

My method:

 

- spf 15+ (30+ on SUNNY snow)

- tolerable smell (#1 criteria)

- non-oily (I get the stuff that's wax based, and it doesnt make my skin feel like a ball of uncooked hamburger)

- reapplied vigorously (think scrubbing face) to face, ears, chin, and entire nose area hourly.

 

Otherwise, I go with what someone else has got or what's cheap.

Posted

 

Don't listen to the morons who scream about skin cancer - the benefits of Vitamin D far outweigh the costs of UV radiation. Check out Australia, which has the highest rate of skin cancer in the world, but the lowest rate of cancer, overall.

 

Many of those morons are Doctors and statisticians. Unlike PLC, who is just a moron. Until you hear it from a source with higher medical bonfides than Mr PLC, just consider this idea suspect

Posted

Your referenced documents point out that levels of sunlight needed for Vitamin D production are well below sunburn-producing amounts. Any additional light exposure significantly increases the odds for melanoma. While the articles are of interest to many readers, one might also argue their relevance to the context of the original poster above as questionable. Reflecting light rays on snow and ice surfaces significantly elevate the incident light intensity far in excess of anything that might remotely be considered healthy, thereby requiring the thinking climber to employ whatever means possible to avoid the incipient cellular breakdown of overexposed epidermal tissue. I recommend Bullfrog. Good shit.

Posted (edited)
Actually, I am a moron statistician.

Your information is interesting, but until I see a better source for medical information than a moron statistician linking to web sited, I'll stay with the status quo. No wait, it's all a big conspiracy isn't it? The sunscreen companies are in cahoots with the makers of anti-cancer drugs and the medical profession as a whole.

 

As was pointed out, the levels of D are probably way below what one receives on snow or water, and areas such as the nose or hands are at risk for skin cancer. that is why the medical profession makes use of statisticians who are not morons

Edited by Roy Snyder

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...