Brianmoore Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 Who likes to argue the most on this site? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 i'd like to order the lasagna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 I want a beer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_White Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 The lunch crowd set goes soft, when Georgette plays a goth! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hafilax Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 I noticed that in the Gas Prices thread. In one Kaskadshyjkozak insults Hummer owners for excessive consumption and then later ridicules the suggestion of reducing our consumption. If I had the patience I'd support that with some quotes. The Devil's Advocate is strong in this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 I noticed that in the Gas Prices thread. In one Kaskadshyjkozak insults Hummer owners for excessive consumption and then later ridicules the suggestion of reducing our consumption. If I had the patience I'd support that with some quotes. The Devil's Advocate is strong in this one. Nonsense. I consistently hold the position that we - ALL OF US -- can and should be less wasteful. But when the same cast of characters comes out with their pontificating extremist message (usually involving social engineering by the force of government), I reject and oppose them. I always find it ridiculous and hypocritical for the same cast of characters who dictate what others should do (by force of law or high taxes) but are willing to change little themselves. Moreover, I do not respect blind, baseless suggestions. I do respect full cost-benefit analyses and reasonable, well-thought out solutions, which, BTW, are usually "nuanced" and a mixed bag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 but what are your stances on gay marriage and abortion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hafilax Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 The 'nuances' of your argument did not come out in your posts and I guess it didn't come out in mine either. I didn't mean to indicate that you don't demonstrate some logic mostly that you tend to be reactionary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 The 'nuances' of your argument did not come out in your posts and I guess it didn't come out in mine either. I didn't mean to indicate that you don't demonstrate some logic mostly that you tend to be reactionary. if there was more balance to the postings, I wouldn't have to "react" to the overwhelming steaming piles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 but what are your stances on gay marriage and abortion? who cares. let's climb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_White Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 but what are your stances on gay marriage and abortion? Wide, I assume. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbw1966 Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 if there was more balance to the postings, I wouldn't have to "react" to the overwhelming steaming piles. You don't have to "react" at all. Or do you lack free will? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Conway Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 but what are your stances on gay marriage and abortion? he's wide on gay marriage and loose on abortion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 if there was more balance to the postings, I wouldn't have to "react" to the overwhelming steaming piles. You don't have to "react" at all. Or do you lack free will? my, you seem argumentative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 but what are your stances on gay marriage and abortion? he's wide on gay marriage and loose on abortion you can fantasize all you want HC - I'm never ''switching teams to play on your side. not that there's anything wrong with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No. 13 Baby Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 The KKK guy has amazing credentials, and he rides his bike in the rain. That's all I need to know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brianmoore Posted March 19, 2008 Author Share Posted March 19, 2008 I noticed that in the Gas Prices thread. In one Kaskadshyjkozak insults Hummer owners for excessive consumption and then later ridicules the suggestion of reducing our consumption. If I had the patience I'd support that with some quotes. The Devil's Advocate is strong in this one. Nonsense. I consistently hold the position that we - ALL OF US -- can and should be less wasteful. But when the same cast of characters comes out with their pontificating extremist message (usually involving social engineering by the force of government), I reject and oppose them. I always find it ridiculous and hypocritical for the same cast of characters who dictate what others should do (by force of law or high taxes) but are willing to change little themselves. Moreover, I do not respect blind, baseless suggestions. I do respect full cost-benefit analyses and reasonable, well-thought out solutions, which, BTW, are usually "nuanced" and a mixed bag. Very interesting response KKK. Let me be the first person to respond to you like you respond to most. STFU n00b! Have nice one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 I noticed that in the Gas Prices thread. In one Kaskadshyjkozak insults Hummer owners for excessive consumption and then later ridicules the suggestion of reducing our consumption. If I had the patience I'd support that with some quotes. The Devil's Advocate is strong in this one. Nonsense. I consistently hold the position that we - ALL OF US -- can and should be less wasteful. But when the same cast of characters comes out with their pontificating extremist message (usually involving social engineering by the force of government), I reject and oppose them. I always find it ridiculous and hypocritical for the same cast of characters who dictate what others should do (by force of law or high taxes) but are willing to change little themselves. Moreover, I do not respect blind, baseless suggestions. I do respect full cost-benefit analyses and reasonable, well-thought out solutions, which, BTW, are usually "nuanced" and a mixed bag. Very interesting response KKK. Let me be the first person to respond to you like you respond to most. STFU n00b! Have nice one. I have to say this: your avatar excludes you from any serious consideration. And one must wonder why, as a Bush-hater, you'd conjoin your identity with his. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexual_chocolate Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 but what are your stances on gay marriage and abortion? Wide, I assume. that was pretty friggin' funny. and no one laughed, out loud at least. sheesh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knotzen Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 but what are your stances on gay marriage and abortion? Wide, I assume. that was pretty friggin' funny. and no one laughed, out loud at least. sheesh. I LOLd. However, this begs the question: if a LOL occurs in the wilderness, and there is no one else there to hear it, is it really a LOL? Or is it just an L? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billcoe Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 "But when the same cast of characters comes out with their pontificating extremist message" ...."I reject and oppose them...." OMG ! Did you just copy and paste my words from the "Find the bolts Dawg" thread? I can't believe I'm agreeing with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 I cant believe it either Bill! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brianmoore Posted March 19, 2008 Author Share Posted March 19, 2008 I have to say this: your avatar excludes you from any serious consideration. And one must wonder why, as a Bush-hater, you'd conjoin your identity with his. “Irony, it seems, is not without a sense of humor” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 I have to say this: your avatar excludes you from any serious consideration. And one must wonder why, as a Bush-hater, you'd conjoin your identity with his. “Irony, it seems, is not without a sense of humor” stfu, boner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 stfu, boner. Ah....shit....we knew it was coming! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.