Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

gee, SS, do you laugh with equal contempt at any (dead) Democrats?

 

thought not.

 

Actually, I didn't really laugh at that. It was just the fastest and most offensive thing I could google that I knew would get a reaction out of you.

 

And to answer your question- actually yes. Martin Van Buren was a really shitty president. I'm glad that fucker is 6 feet under.

 

 

Posted

gee, SS, do you laugh with equal contempt at any (dead) Democrats?

 

thought not.

 

Actually, I didn't really laugh at that. It was just the fastest and most offensive thing I could google that I knew would get a reaction out of you.

 

And to answer your question- actually yes. Martin Van Buren was a really shitty president. I'm glad that fucker is 6 feet under.

 

 

OK, that was funny :grlaf: (Porter: take notes)

 

Posted

gee, SS, do you laugh with equal contempt at any (dead) Democrats?

 

thought not.

 

Actually, I didn't really laugh at that. It was just the fastest and most offensive thing I could google that I knew would get a reaction out of you.

 

And to answer your question- actually yes. Martin Van Buren was a really shitty president. I'm glad that fucker is 6 feet under.

 

 

OK, that was funny :grlaf: (Porter: take notes)

 

MY TURDS ARE FUNNIER THAN YOU ARE. NOW LICK SACK.

Posted

been reading gibbon's "decline n' fall of the roman empire" lately - just came across a good quite to describe this favored punching-bags:

 

(in describing the asshole opponents of pertinax, a new and virtous emperor who followed the monstrous tyrant commodus)

 

"his honest indiscretion united against him the servile crowd, who found their private benefit in the public disorders, and who preferred the favour of a tyrant to the inexorable equality of laws."

 

seem to describe most of the bushII-era crony ass-fucks

Posted
been reading gibbon's "decline n' fall of the roman empire" lately - just came across a good quite to describe this favored punching-bags:

 

(in describing the asshole opponents of pertinax, a new and virtous emperor who followed the monstrous tyrant commodus)

 

"his honest indiscretion united against him the servile crowd, who found their private benefit in the public disorders, and who preferred the favour of a tyrant to the inexorable equality of laws."

 

seem to describe most of the bushII-era crony ass-fucks

 

so, is that tome worth muddling through?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...