sexual_chocolate Posted February 1, 2008 Posted February 1, 2008 mr. cocoa, you were just wrong. face it. i hate to agree with this merry band of sprayers but they're right. you're wrong and probably should apologize. wrong to insult, or wrong with my opinion that it is way poor taste to post revealing photos of someone without that someone knowing? anyways, gotta go. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 1, 2008 Posted February 1, 2008 mr. cocoa, you were just wrong. face it. i hate to agree with this merry band of sprayers but they're right. you're wrong and probably should apologize. wrong to insult, or wrong with my opinion that it is way poor taste to post revealing photos of someone without that someone knowing? anyways, gotta go. The high cost of protecting a precious ego, brought to you by Spray. Quote
underworld Posted February 1, 2008 Posted February 1, 2008 (edited) this whole thread started with ego. btw, I've never met a happy person that feels the need to tell anyone else how much happier they are than others. Edited February 1, 2008 by underworld Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 1, 2008 Posted February 1, 2008 this whole thread started with ego. ego, from climbers? on climbing web site? oh noes! Quote
ivan Posted February 1, 2008 Posted February 1, 2008 somehow i liked this pic much more than the stone nude ones - if there was a half-drunk 40 of OE on the counter next to a coupla crack rocks and maybe a shredded gideon's bible it'd have more of the motel vida loca i've come to adore Quote
kevbone Posted February 1, 2008 Posted February 1, 2008 wrong to insult, or wrong with my opinion that it is way poor taste to post revealing photos of someone without that someone knowing? So true SC. I was not trying to insult 111, just making a point that he thought the skinny chick was hot and I was putting it in perspective for him. I suppose in the end……to each his/her own! Quote
rbw1966 Posted February 1, 2008 Posted February 1, 2008 Kevbone, you putting something in perspective for someone is like a legless man telling an olympic gold medalist how to run. Quote
Peter_Puget Posted February 1, 2008 Posted February 1, 2008 At 111 and his sweety can honeymoon in the South: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0201081fat1.html Quote
archenemy Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 So, that chick is hot. When she dumps you after finding out that you posted this photo on the thread, she is alllllll mine! Quote
billcoe Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 Congrats 111, if she's that good inside you got a winner, remember that it's whats inside that counts. Outside is just a bonus that can and will change over time. Quote
jmace Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 So, that chick is hot. When she dumps you after finding out that you posted this photo on the thread, she is alllllll mine! What you gonna do Archy..lick her to death..oooh im gonna really really lick you pretty sure you need to be packin a hog to dish out the type of punishment that girl deserves Quote
Off_White Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 Jmace, I'm guess that the weekend started a little early, eh? Quote
jmace Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 hahahha...yup I worked 5:30 to 6:30 all week..im just ridin out the last hour.. Quote
Off_White Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 PLEASE DO NOT POST PHOTOS OF LOVED-ONES ON THE INTERNETS WITHOUT THEM KNOWING. THIS IS WAY MORE BASE THAN GETTING A LITTLE COTTAGE CHEESE STUCK BETWEEN YOUR TEETH AND GUMS. AND A RANCID ODOR ON YOUR UPPER LIP. I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT WHEN YOU, TVASH, POST REVEALING PHOTOS OF YOURSELF, THERE IS A DECENT CHANCE YOU KNOW YOU ARE POSTING THESE PHOTOS. I UNDERSTANDS THAT SOME GUYS (AND GALS) ARE TEMPTED TO POST PHOTOS OF THINGS THAT GIVE THEM AN EGO BOOST, BUT HUMAN BEINGS ARE NOT THINGS, AND TO ATTEMPT AN EGO-BOOST THROUGH THIS TYPE OF BEHAVIOUR IS, AHEM, CHEESY AT BEST. JUDGING BY THE PHOTO OF HIS BELOVED, 111 IS PROBABLY JUST GETTING PAST HIS TEEN ACNE STAGE, SO A BOUT OF YOUTHFUL INDISCRETION CAN CERTAINLY GIVE HIM SOME LEEWAY, BUT CONSIDERING THE TITLE OF HIS THREAD, THE LEEWAY SEEMS A BIT MEAGER. Ahh, now I understand your point. I didn't get this from your rude defamation of the woman unaware of her new public status, but now that you spell out what you actually think about it, I can't say I disagree with you. Maybe you thought you were being clear with your intentions, but I assure you that thinking other people are mind readers is another surefire way to fuck up a relationship. So tell me Karnak, is this also the subtext of Raindawg's lighter version of denigration of total strangers? 111, you should take Muffy's sage advice offered up awhile back and come clean with her, or I assure you no good can come of this. You should also show her that photoshopped version, that is actually funny. Quote
sexual_chocolate Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 wrong to insult. way to cut and run dude had obligaciones, mujer. i'm amused at how up in arms people get over insults thrown at some schmuck who offers up his frickin' FIANCEE, woman he LOVES, blah blah blah, half-naked, to a bunch of strangers on the fucking internet. shit! some schmuck is bragging about his hot gf, and actually posts a photo, and challenges these strangers with a "jealous?". you gotta be kiddin' that you'd get offended if someone throws shit at him. i'm surprised, that you, as a woman, wouldn't be pissed at HIM for posting photos of her without her even knowing. maybe they roll that way, i don't know. you know what though? i don't even think he's legit. notice how he's disappeared? although he may have sobered up, and is now mortified? perhaps. i don't think he's legit, cuz he'd have taken the photos down, if it mattered to him. Quote
billcoe Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 SHhhhhhhhhhh, SC, hey tone it down will ya, thats the best pic I've seen in a long time, lets encourage it staying around hey? Quote
minx Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 wrong to insult. way to cut and run dude had obligaciones, mujer. i'm amused at how up in arms people get over insults thrown at some schmuck who offers up his frickin' FIANCEE, woman he LOVES, blah blah blah, half-naked, to a bunch of strangers on the fucking internet. shit! some schmuck is bragging about his hot gf, and actually posts a photo, and challenges these strangers with a "jealous?". you gotta be kiddin' that you'd get offended if someone throws shit at him. i'm surprised, that you, as a woman, wouldn't be pissed at HIM for posting photos of her without her even knowing. maybe they roll that way, i don't know. you know what though? i don't even think he's legit. notice how he's disappeared? although he may have sobered up, and is now mortified? perhaps. i don't think he's legit, cuz he'd have taken the photos down, if it mattered to him. ummm...quit being purposely dense. you can insult 111 all you want. i think its lame that you we're insulting the girl in the pic. you can't hide from that fact. Quote
JayB Posted February 2, 2008 Posted February 2, 2008 wrong to insult. way to cut and run dude had obligaciones, mujer. i'm amused at how up in arms people get over insults thrown at some schmuck who offers up his frickin' FIANCEE, woman he LOVES, blah blah blah, half-naked, to a bunch of strangers on the fucking internet. shit! some schmuck is bragging about his hot gf, and actually posts a photo, and challenges these strangers with a "jealous?". you gotta be kiddin' that you'd get offended if someone throws shit at him. i'm surprised, that you, as a woman, wouldn't be pissed at HIM for posting photos of her without her even knowing. maybe they roll that way, i don't know. you know what though? i don't even think he's legit. notice how he's disappeared? although he may have sobered up, and is now mortified? perhaps. i don't think he's legit, cuz he'd have taken the photos down, if it mattered to him. If these were your motivations, it seems odd that you would have taken the tack you did, instead of starting off with something like the above. All in all, I think that would have been more in keeping with the SC (the deft touch, the elision, the rhetorical fencing)that we all know and love than the "I think it's dangerous and reckless for an adult to let their kids play in a busy street so I'll run their kids over to teach them a lesson" rationale than starting off with the "Your girl is a nasty ho" angle. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.