ClimbingPanther

Doesn't that just mean that Democrats are about 4 times corrupter than Republicans? Conspiracy theorizing :pagetop:'s Besides, even the word d'EMO'c'RAT' should tell you something about them. Now, re'PUB'li'CAN' is just plain cooler.

isn't Sherri a total rock star at wood? maybe you should PM her

We have always had things that look like Porter crawling out of the ground in Eastern Washington

bill, i love you man, and that hurts

I think you'll have more trouble finding a gym than partners. There's only one or two here. I don't know anything about them but I don't think they're too thrilling. If I were you, I'd plan to drive 1 hr. to Vantage & you can hook up with tons of partners from this board who will meet you there. It's pretty much an outdoor gym with no belay card requirement. the gyms I know of are at the Tri-City Court Club and at Columbia Basin College. I think CBC only has a revolving wall (think vertical treadmill).

ohboyohboyohboyohboy, I just got accepted to med school in SoCal, so unless UW gets its act together and lets me in, then I will not be a cascade climber for a very long time. :mixedemotions:

Is it ethical for a woman to wear more than a bra top at the crags?

nsfw?

dang, wish I had looked at the thread so I know what the fuss is.

That's so gay when people use "lame" as a synonymn for something negative. I know a lot of lame people and I'm offended by your retarded post.

Not true, they just haven't released that info to the media yet. The "Thursday" story was just a smokescreen, apparently.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/02/18/satellite.intercept/index.html?iref=newssearch

that's funny, I read 55 miles too bad I'm not a morning person

The Third Man - delightfully evil film noir classic Murder on the Orient Express - more evil you can't help but smile at Charade - any film with the line "You fell for her like an egg from a tall chicken!" is so worth a watch

not a bad idea so you want this bunch of spraylords to find that the easiest threads to post in and keep track of are all climbing related? you're playing with fire.

Just don't use Schoeller pants. I call them my "self-arrest pants" for a reason.

Anybody notice how far down Iraq is on that list? What does that mean w/r/t the war? Was it really about oil? Shoot, we should have started a war with Canada! They're too stuck on the Geneva conventions to pull the kind of suicide crap the Iraqis are so good at, plus the soldiers could go skiing at Whistler in between battles!

but maybe he meant this instead?

aw, don't be so harsh, the bone just asked an honest question. kev, an earmark (for the purpose of this discussion) is when a US Senator or Congressman/woman asks for money from the federal government for a project that really only benefits their own state. They put an earmark in a huge bill so nobody really notices, and when voting against the bill makes everyone look bad. i.e. a bunch of senators put in millions upon millions of dollars in earmarks on a minimum wage bill. Therefore, if you vote against the minimum wage bill because there's earmarks in it, you will be labeled anti-poor people. Now there are probably some earmarks which really do benefit the nation somehow, but there's no oversight whatsoever and if McCain didn't ask for a red cent, then they're apparently not all that necessary.

Ouch, there's a stat that *should* single-handedly nail the coffin on Hillary. Of course, Bush's $6,210,938,571,965 earmark for the war makes them all look like saints. With that kind of money, you could insure a lot of people with the best single-provider health insurance a socialist regime can offer! Bring it.

i've never heard them called "answers" before

Are any of you members of JACS???

Here's some references to it: Article the fifth [Amendment III] No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. Article the sixth [Amendment IV] The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Article the seventh [Amendment V] No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Years of supreme court interpretation and congressional law have clarified an individual's liberties are not the same on private & public property, thus giving private property a high degree of importance pertaining to liberty.

Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither OR... Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Environmental Sustainability Deserve Neither

hmmm... I said: "and those views included a disdain for hardcore libertarian private property rights" "and involved federal regulation of private property" maybe you incorrectly stated them in the first place? oh well, this is neither here nor there. I just wanted to make the point that private property is super important and is more intertwined with the liberties the Constitution gives us than most people think.