underworld

the better december cragging destination is the one having more fun

i heard a snippit of a story the other day about a guy that started with a paperclip and kept trading up till he got a house. i haven't bothered googling it yet. i don't want to ruin it by finding out it can't be done.

this might be the thread to change some opinions!!!

the funniest movie is the one having the most best

where're all the white women at

"why don't you take a bite of your burger and we'll yell ya"

layer up.... glacier killer!

"WE LANDED ON THE MOOOOOOON"

"Big gulps....wulp, see ya later"

the similarity is striking tho.... go - and there are consequences don't go - and there are consequences it's up to the worker to weigh the consequenses and the risk/benefits of each. give them the credit to make that decision and don't try and think for them.

"Should they have to go" they don't have to go... should i have to pay my morgage? no, i don't have to - but if i choose not to, i'll forfeit the benefit of living at my house.

owe asaresultof climbing

this guy must never of heard of people before him that got liberal arts degrees... how does the saying go? those that don't know history are bound to repeat it... or something like that. ironical..

photoshopped!!!

fake, but accurate... duh!

from the one on the right... "can you take it again, i blinked"

how about going the other way and saying... damn those guys suck for making something that sucks. getting the word out and letting (uh oh...i 'm about to say it) the market fix it. word of mouth is wayyyy more successffull than getting the govt involved for instance - people are pissed about dependance on oil. ok, not the best example since people are bitching that the govt should regulate it more...well they aren't regulating it as much as SOME would like. however, look at what all the car manufacturers are making and marketing.... HIGH MPG CARS! the market is fixing itself

"here's your ticket to the GUNSHOW!!!"

You obviously haven't bothered to see the movie, nor has KKK et al, probably. "I wouldn't give that assclown one thin dime (but I'll argue against points I never actually saw firsthand till I'm blue in the face)!". Essentially, Gore presents the raw data. You decide whether or not you believe it. correction... gore presents SOME raw data i don't have to see the movie to realize that. text books, scientists, experts....each only present some data (of their choosing)

you could have done your part by not buying a computer.... speaking of computers, simply powering down when not in use saves electricity and reduces your carbon footprint. how many folks out there do you think leave their computers on continuously? I would think every big company out there leaves them on, updates usually run at night and computer has to be on. we already know that big companies are evil.

Not quite. Some acts might have more impact, and some less. It's a matter of looking at the impact in the aggregate. And cutting back, might not mean cutting out completely. For example, I might climb at Snoqualmie Pass more and Washington Pass less. I might buy replacement gear less often, rather than not at all, and buy used more often or rent/borrow more (although the latter might involve driving to pick up and drop off...). my point is that if EVERY bit counts... then exactly that. EVERY BIT. climbing at snoqualmie has impact...you can take that impact away by not going. unless it isn't that much of a dire situation. global warming, that is. it's not all or nothing i agree.... the alarmist seem to think it is tho. IMO.

i'd just like to hear one global warming alamist admit that there is a POSSIBILITY that gore et al could be distorting things as well. it doesn't mean you have to throw out what they are saying. but give a little constructive skeptism to what we hear. i'm not what you'd call an alarmist (duh) and i admit that those that deny the global warming can and do distort things (too)...

Not quite. Some acts might have more impact, and some less. It's a matter of looking at the impact in the aggregate. And cutting back, might not mean cutting out completely. For example, I might climb at Snoqualmie Pass more and Washington Pass less. I might buy replacement gear less often, rather than not at all, and buy used more often or rent/borrow more (although the latter might involve driving to pick up and drop off...). my point is that if EVERY bit counts... then exactly that. EVERY BIT. climbing at snoqualmie has impact...you can take that impact away by not going. unless it isn't that much of a dire situation. global warming, that is.

democrats, dipshits, dumbasses