KaskadskyjKozak

I was referring to his 2006 reelection campaign fuckwit.

Is he sterile now? Darwin in action!

If Lieberman had not run, a Democrat would have won his office, and would have voted for Barrycare as well.

It's also true that just because you are exposed to an illness it is not 100% you will get it. Guess you should forgo the vaccination and "take a chance" (kind of like Russian Roulette). There's more to this than an individual's susceptibility to an illness. If the vaccine is effective for a large majority the laws of probability kick in and the spread of an illness is vastly reduced. If everyone is unvaccinated, it is easier to spread the illness and do so quickly. Is the smallpox vaccine 100% for all people? Because interestingly enough that illness was wiped off the planet thanks to the vaccine (except for a few government deep freezers...). And smallpox also requires booster shots for immunity.

Once again, a little math: Pertussis vaccine is at best 90% effective. (CDC/WHO) Pertussis vaccine loses efficacy over time (CDC/WHO) So there is at least a 10% chance that you are not immune and could catch it. It also means that 1 in 10 children you come in contact with (higher if you consider that the vaccine may be only 85% effective, and that infants under 6 months are too young for the vaccine) are not immune. You could catch it and spread it to them, at Safeway for instance, increasing their chances of death. So when you make comments like this: it makes you sound uninformed. Parents who do not vaccinate their children are negligent. Period.

Generally children and the elderly are more susceptible to such illnesses than adults, and could die. Moreover as the caretaker for a child (who can not make decisions for himself) it is negligent not to protect the child from a preventable, serious illness. If I don't get booster shots for myself, well, I am the one who will bear the brunt of that decision, should I get sick.

Does anyone? You keep bringing this up - not sure why. Children who get pertussis suffer and risk death. It's preventable - why not do so? The only boosters that I recall having are for tetanus. I stepped on a fucking nail when I was 10 or 11 and got one, then needed another for a puncture wound around 20-22.

More "intellectual" arguments/verbiage from Tranny-Tina.

If only 55% of D's support it, it ain't gonna happen. Libtards can rip on the Tea party and R's all you want, but WTF is wrong with your own house that you have 45% against this?

I like your new sig!

Because some animals are more equal than others.

well, they can "do whatever they fuck they want", after all!

it's all Bush's fault.

Damn you sobo! :-)

Screw that. K-Mart. Pup-tent.

The disgusting view of corporate America presented by the Apprentice is repugnant enough to make me consider joining Prole's Marxist ranks.

feel free to enligthen me then - i've heard the term before but don't know much, other than that they're supposed to penetrate body-armor - what is such ammo, how is it different from other types, and why/why not shoudl it be banned? PM sent LOL Wouldn't want to post it on the forum... make yourself look even more stupid LOL

We could hire the French to do it for us. :-)

Newsflash for j_b: the Soviet-run Chornobyl plant has NOTHING to do with the French-style Nuclear power system.

Gang-rape is always smart and funny, right? Democrat violent rhetoric = Smart and funny Republican violent rhetoric - Mui Mal! Exactly. What else would you expect from a sociopathological kook like ttk?

"birds sociopaths of a feather"

http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2008/09/19/2008-09-19_sandra_bernhard_issues_gang_rape_warning-2.html Sandra sounds like a real sociopath. She'd get along great with TTK.

You forgot the most important point - she's a LOSER. And Americans don't like losers. She's as likely to win a presidential bid as Al Gore or John Kerry - two other recent losers.