KaskadskyjKozak

Be careful or j_b will call you a Social Darwinist.

Nice summation of your presence on cc.com.

is she meopausal?

It's you ;-)

Where'd you score the pic of TTK?

Why does the bank of Zimbabwe have a picture of Pandora's Box on their currency? ;-)

are you comparing george bush jr.'s iraqi pursuits with the actions of those above? do you consider them equal? "death's of 100's of thousands of innocents" Dresden Hiroshima etc.

Yeah, right, despite the fact he has lived there repeatedly (for months at a time presumably) and you haven't. Oh yeah, you are "smarter", a true know-it-all.

This proves nothing - other than your propensity to attribute (whole systems of) beliefs to individuals in broad-brush strokes.

No (true) Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge.

You have the personality of slime-mold.

"never the obvious call"? I'd say it's fairly obvious on this one. if ET showed up (ask tvash) and saw the carnage that US foreign policy has bequeathed upon the world, there wouldn't be much room for equivocation. but before you get all wound up: other countries have fucked shit up too! amazing! no self-hate needed. but you are right about the sociopathy charge: i think psychopathy is more fitting, with a touch of psychosis. i mean, check it out: george bush all of a sudden starts believing in a guy who claimed to talk to god some 2,000 years ago. ok, so this part i'm cool with; i think i've talked to god too! but here's the hard part: this 2,000 year old god-talker named jesus said hey humanoids, love each other. blessed are the peace-makers. god says to chill out and turn the other cheek. if you do anything , at least don't hurt others. so here's this self-proclaimed born-again christian who has taken jesus the peace-monger as his personal saviour and unequivocal leader , yet somehow finds the capacity to attack a defenseless country with the largest most sophisticated army in the history of mankind, KILLING HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE. if the above does not fit the diagnostics of psychosis and psychopathy, then the terms are meaningless and entirely political in nature. By your argument, Lincoln, Truman and FDR are all psychopaths.

is that why you support giving tax breaks to plutocrats who are investing to create jobs abroad? is that an American value too? KKK supported spending 3 trillion we didn't have to wage war in Iraq and Afghanistan, giving $400 billions to the pharmaceutical industry, widespread clamp down on civil liberties, the unitary executive, etc and yet, here is this hypocrite trying to lecture us about "wasteful and FORCED" government. Has the far right wing mastered Orwellian newspeak or what? You need to get (back) on meds. Seriously.

Nope. There's two people who regularly post in Spray that I regularly call out as being marxists - prole and j_b. If you can find a post where I call YOU that, please let's see the link. Nonsense. Although it is an American value to be self-sufficient and earn your way, it is also an American value to give generously to charity and to help one another. What the right opposes is wasteful and FORCED government intrusion in the latter, often with outcomes that fall flat w/r/t to achieving the supposed aims of the government programs in question. Indeed the latter smack more and more simply pimping for votes, and building a dependent, obligated electorate. Alright, now I am saying you are f-ing insane. "George Bush is a sociopath" - that is the type of nonsensical hyperbolic rhetoric I expect from Prole. For you guys left of center it's never the obvious call on who is "evil" or a "sociopath" but always some crazy moral equivalency argument rooted in self-hatred and the desire to attack your own as "no better" than the "other".

oh, ok, you simply didn't undersand. that's different. you might have asked him though, nicely, as to what he meant. my take is that he thinks there are deep human values and rights that get trampled in a society that gives primacy to money and its attendant influences. there is nothing original about the US being shaped in so manys ways by the aggregration of capital in the hands of a few who then exert tremendous influence on policy and culture, but i believe that, regardless of how much precedent exists, he is troubled by it. LOL! Here's the quote again: As usual j_b is attributing some sort of broad-brush stroke set of beliefs to his interlocutors, lumping them into one pile. He vaguely mentions the term "Social Darwinist" and, in a convoluted run-on, talks about how one supposed "Social Darwinist" agrees with some vague "other Social Darwinist", and attributes to them both some supposed belief they hold regarding the precedence of economic freedom. I am sure if you read the Unabomber's Manifesto there are grains of truth and valid commentary on modern society. However, that does not mean the Mr. Kaczynski was not bat-shit crazy. When I read j_b's ramblings I honestly do wonder about his sanity.

You are f-ing insane. is there any chance you might for once add something of substance and value to a thread? Parse what j_b wrote above and convince me that it is actually something of substance, please; I am dying to see what you can come up with.

You are f-ing insane. Your response typifies your style of "debate". As usual j_b posts a long argument, which you simply dismiss, along with some vapid insults. And you actually expect people to engage you seriously in discussion - there's nothing serious yet alone substantive that you have to offer. And your cryptonazi twin is not different. Are you serious? Compare the rambling nonsense of j_b with his cc.com hominem's prose and tell me you actually believe they are equivalent. Read the quote above from him and honestly tell me it is cogent and the product of a healthy mind.

You are f-ing insane.

LOL - what's your poison tonight?

And what are you for hurling yet another lame insult, you Internet Tough Guy.

"Liar", "cheating scumbags" - you are INCAPABLE to posting anything without lame, gratuitous insults, aren't you?

All cultures? LOL His point about the left in the US making constant excuses for Islamic extremist terror are on point, and you prove it over and over again.

Sure there is. And it can be done with more than a one word scatological retort. However, that would require YOU to actually be serious and exert some sort of effort. Try and do it without throwing in the gratuitous insults - I bet you can't.

Your response typifies your style of "debate". As usual JayB posts a long argument, which you simply dismiss, along with some vapid insults. And you actually expect people to engage you seriously in discussion - there's nothing serious yet alone substantive that you have to offer. And your meme twin is not different.

The clip you posted and ridicule reminds me a lot of the hand-wringing you and j_b regularly engage in. Of course your version of doom-and-gloom revolves around the supposedly disastrous failures of capitalism and are as far left of center as Fox is on the other side of the spectrum, but the nature and silliness of your approach is fundamentally identical to that of Beck and others on Fox.