assmonkey

No, it's not a pun. Checkit: Not work friendly link (Adult Video News site). Work frendly link (CBS News).

It's like I suddenly understand the machinations of 'Dru' and 'AlpineK.' Fuckin' scary, huh?

Bam.

I like 60 minutes.

Bam.

Why do women wear makeup and perfume? Because they're ugly and smell bad. Bwahh! Just kidding. I like women!

Cool pic.

PBR sucks. What's up with the newfound popularity? I used to drink PBR at The 'Vern in Portland because I was a dirtbag with a crappy paying job and it was $4 a pitcher. That's all I could afford. Now that I have a job, it's all about The Rogue.

Shit... My apologies:

Hee hee. That's kinda fun!

PAGE TOPPER! <This post has been edited to include the following>

Check it out...

Those are the ones to which I am referring. Someone posted a link to his site earlier in the thread. Couple more beefs: In the new guides, there is a column denoting if it is possible to TR a route. Cool idea, I think, but the author has X'd (meaning it's not safe to TR) many of the routes that I've been TRing for years. I don't get it. 32/38 is probably one of the safest areas to climb that I've ever seen, in fact, I can't recall a single route I wouldn't TR (with a directional qd placed here or there). Also, it would have been sweet to have a list of all the 32/38 gear climbs on a single page. Easy enough to solve that problem with a ballpoint pen on the bus to work one day, though.

I have a beef with the new Exit 32 and 38 guides. Half the information is in the front of the book, and the other half is in the back of the book. That frickin' sucks, flippin' the pages back and forth. Not to mention that the Kinko's copy job doesn't really pack well. I, too, am a bit of a guide book junkie, and I don't recall seeing that style used before. With all the new routes up at 38 and an information deficit on the routes at 32, I welcome the information in the new guides. I just can't stand the layout and format. I will probably get copies of Burdo's new guide when it comes out, just because it will hopefully read better (no frickin' flippin' pages back and forth) and pack better. But, both guides are a welcome antidote to the inaccuracies published in previous guides regarding the area. (I'm thinking of one book in particular.) I always wondered what Repo Man was called. Let me add too, that I think it would be the shiznit if Burdo added some history of the area. He seems to be the dude who knows it all, it's not written down in the 32/38 guides, and it would be a shame to lose the history. Yeah, yeah, it's not Yosemite, but I imagine there's still some good background stories about the development of routes out there. And it is, arguably, the most popular Seattle crag.

This thread kind of sucks. No offense or anything.

I dunno. I got kind of turned on looking at the pictures. She's hot. She's dangerous. A regular party machine?

"[snicker] That's all, huh?"

No, but do you happen to have the link to Oksana's page? - a s s m 0 n k e y

Wie Bitte, picked up the Camp 4 book on the way home from work tonight. -a s s m o n k e y

Out of curiousity, where? Would like to check it out.... -assmnky

Ok, I'd settle for a less comprehensive overview of the big milestones of Yosemite climbing from the Robbins days through the Bridwell days. Does that help? Am I fishing for an answer on the wrong board? ... Beuller? ... Beuller?

Another poor decision made by the marketing departement of a ski/board company (K2 in this case). "Snowboard Maker's Anti-Gay Banner"