why must it always be a semantics argument?  "wrong" is a personal label, as are all words.  ultimately, whether this is a just or unjust war will depend upon the people who look at it (how will it be taught in history classes, 200 years from now i wonder?  will it be in the same category as sand-creek and wounded knee, i wonder?) - it's simplest i suppose to defer to the majority though in choosing a label - on dec 8, 1941, there was an incredibly small minority  opposed to war w/ japan - in march of 2003, america as a whole was much more uncertain. there were huge protests immediately. 4 years later, a very large chunk of america, likely a majority, would label this war as unjust. 
  
again, wtf is there this cyncism as to motive?  who gives a shit why sheehan or the democrats are opposed to the war?  the point is, do they have a point?  is this in fact a just war?  at any rate, while i'm a jaded asshole, i'm not so far gone that i think a grieving mother and a large # of democrats are opposed to the war simply so they can get their faces in the papers.  they are geniulely opposed to it - deal w/ their arguments then, not their motives.