KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 31, 2012 Posted October 31, 2012 what relationship doesn't have its politics? confucius' whole construction of the best government/society boiled down to every member of it accepting certain rules of behavior, based on the relationship, be it father-son, subject-emperor, safeway clerk-shopper, etc. What you are talking about is social interaction. Politics to me involves how a government works, and how those desiring to be in power or to keep it once attained present a case to bolster their position and get things done that they want. When I say politicizing I am talking about the desire here (and elsewhere) to immediately convert a natural disaster into an opportunity to attack "the other", where "the other" is based on a political POV/party. It's sickening already. And I'm not "crying" because Romney is getting attacked by numbnuts like you, Crux. I say the same thing for anyone using this as an opportunity to attack Obama or the Dems, including the former FEMA head mentioned previously. Everyone needs to STFU means everyone not just "the other side". But hey, go back to your circle jerk, and endless us-vs-them hatefest bickering, if that's what gets you through each sad day. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted October 31, 2012 Posted October 31, 2012 Everyone 'needs' to do precisely nothing here, but a lack of repetition, a hint of originality, and a spoonful of humor is always appreciated. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 31, 2012 Posted October 31, 2012 takes his ball and goes home Hey, maybe you could donate some money to help folks over in NY, or spend your time helping them instead of whining like a little bitch endlessly about the "bad" Republicans. Then again, based on your posting patterns over the years, I know that asking you to mature past age 12 is a bit much. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted October 31, 2012 Posted October 31, 2012 I think I'll walk a few precincts right here at home to try to make sure your dumb ass side loses instead, thanks. Got about 700 infrequent voters to bug the shit out of before Tue. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 Keeping fascists out and FEMA in costs lotsa politicizing money against fucks like you. Remind me next week, and I'll send you a can of dog food and a dollar or two. Yeah yeah whatever you say internet tough guy. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 Fortunately for the northeast, certain forward looking president reconstituted the smoldering remains of a FEMA that a certain dumb-as-a-post president gutted. Compare the disaster response for Sandy and Katrina. LEADERSHIP. Quote
Pete_H Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 But hey, go back to your circle jerk, and endless us-vs-them hatefest bickering, if that's what gets you through each sad day. I'm with KKK on this one. You fuckers are like FOX news in inverse sometimes. Quote
rob Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 But hey, go back to your circle jerk, and endless us-vs-them hatefest bickering, if that's what gets you through each sad day. I'm with KKK on this one. You fuckers are like FOX news in inverse sometimes. Except I don't pretend to be a legitimate news agency with journalistic standards. But, that's cool. Quote
Pete_H Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 True. But you're also like the inverse of my crazy uncle Warren who thinks Obama is a commy fascist. Quote
Pete_H Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 The one thing I will say about Romney is that he's not a puppet of any special interest, like Bush was to the oil industry. Romney also isn't beholden to the extreme end of his party, like I think Obama tends to be. Romney didn't get the support of the Teabaggers, the religious right, etc. in the primary. While Obama was Pelosi and Reed's boy throughout his candidacy and arguably his Presidency. Quote
rob Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 The one thing I will say about Romney is that he's not a puppet of any special interest, like Bush was to the oil industry. Romney also isn't beholden to the extreme end of his party, like I think Obama tends to be. Romney didn't get the support of the Teabaggers, the religious right, etc. in the primary. While Obama was Pelosi and Reed's boy throughout his candidacy and arguably his Presidency. If he's not a puppet, beholden, etc. then why does he keep changing his platform? I dunno, you can't be a politician these days and not belong to somebody. Obama, too. That's politics. I don't think anybody knows what the real Mitt Romney thinks. Quote
Pete_H Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 Unfortunately its a necessity in our winner-take-all two party system. Candidates have to appeal to the extreme ends of their party during the primary then move to the center for the general. Quote
Pete_H Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 The thing I hate the most about the R party is their social agenda. That's why I have concerns supporting any Republican. However, I don't think Romney has any plans to change anything despite what he's said during the primary. He was Governor of Massacheussettes afterall. Quote
rob Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 The thing I hate the most about the R party is their social agenda. That's why I have concerns supporting any Republican. However, I don't think Romney has any plans to change anything despite what he's said during the primary. He was Governor of Massacheussettes afterall. Yeah maybe so, but I think he doesn't have any plans to stand up to his party or their social agenda, either. Quote
Pete_H Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 Come on dude, he's got binders full of women. You're right though, that would be a big concern for me in voting for him. Quote
mattp Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 I'm with KKK on this one. You fuckers are like FOX news in inverse sometimes. I agree, maybe. If your point is that "liberals" can be closed minded, that is. I recently received a referral to this site: sensible Washington My liberal friends are unwilling to discuss it. I'm wondering if anybody here has information or opinions on this. Is the current Marijuana proposal a bad idea even if you favor legalization? Quote
olyclimber Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 Jesus Peter , who are you with this nonsense? Hitler??? Quote
olyclimber Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 Come on dude, he's got binders full of women. You're right though, that would be a big concern for me in voting for him. Socialist Commie. Quote
olyclimber Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 I know some people won't be happy till they can rip on the bong in the middle of downtown during midday. This law they are trying to pass is not perfect...but it is progress. Rome was not built in one day. Quote
rob Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 It's better than existing policy, anyway. I'll take a tiny step forward over stagnation. But I'll look at the site anyway Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 I'm with KKK on this one. You fuckers are like FOX news in inverse sometimes. I agree, maybe. If your point is that "liberals" can be closed minded, that is. I recently received a referral to this site: sensible Washington My liberal friends are unwilling to discuss it. I'm wondering if anybody here has information or opinions on this. Is the current Marijuana proposal a bad idea even if you favor legalization? It's too late, I already voted yes for gay weed. Quote
rob Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 You remind me of a middle-schooler a lot, Rob. That's pretty fair Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 1, 2012 Posted November 1, 2012 The one thing I will say about Romney is that he's not a puppet of any special interest, like Bush was to the oil industry. Romney also isn't beholden to the extreme end of his party, like I think Obama tends to be. Romney didn't get the support of the Teabaggers, the religious right, etc. in the primary. While Obama was Pelosi and Reed's boy throughout his candidacy and arguably his Presidency. The Republicans tried to make everyone else the front runner first before resigning to Mitt as "the guy" at the very end. That is telling, don't you think? I bet he'll piss off people on both sides of the aisle if elected, which is kind of what we need, don't you think? (read my lips...) I don't think he'll win anyways so it's probably a useless discussion at this point anyways. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.