Fairweather Posted November 25, 2004 Posted November 25, 2004 Christine Gregoire...... concede, please. Quote
jon Posted November 25, 2004 Posted November 25, 2004 Image no worky, post the link. BTW welcome back dude, I assume the costco sized package of klenex and tampax that I sent got there? Could komotv.com have picked a worse picture of Gregoire? Quote
ChrisT Posted November 25, 2004 Posted November 25, 2004 uh some of us here southern folk voted for Gergoire. Quote
Fairweather Posted November 25, 2004 Author Posted November 25, 2004 Image no worky, post the link. http://www.funlol.com/content/img/0182.jpg Quote
JayB Posted November 25, 2004 Posted November 25, 2004 Word. Good to have FW Back. Please put your pictures back up in the gallery as well! Quote
griz Posted November 25, 2004 Posted November 25, 2004 Nice shade of yellow. just cut and paste. it works that way. Quote
AlpineK Posted November 25, 2004 Posted November 25, 2004 Nice to see you Fairweather. If you want to stay on the moral highground maybe you should give up stealing stuff. On a more logical note if every one of the 536,978 people who live in Seattle voted for Christine Gregoire and the rest of the state's 2.8 million voters voted for Dino Rossi then Christine would have got 20% of the vote and Dino 80%. I think a bunch of your neighbors, the smart ones, voted for Christine Gregoire. Quote
Dru Posted November 25, 2004 Posted November 25, 2004 Can they do a runoff election? 42 votes out of 2.8 million is a statistical dead heat. Quote
Snafflehunter Posted November 25, 2004 Posted November 25, 2004 Nice to see you Fairweather. If you want to stay on the moral highground maybe you should give up stealing stuff. On a more logical note if every one of the 536,978 people who live in Seattle voted for Christine Gregoire and the rest of the state's 2.8 million voters voted for Dino Rossi then Christine would have got 20% of the vote and Dino 80%. I think a bunch of your neighbors, the smart ones, voted for Christine Gregoire. I guess smart is all relative though, right AlpineK? Quote
chucK Posted November 26, 2004 Posted November 26, 2004 I heard on the radio (this spouted by the DNC guy in WA [truth in advertising]) that there was a Cal Tech study done showing that the error rate of these voting machines is more than 1%. So, yes, 42 out of 2.8 million (0.00004%) is a tie. A runoff election would be interesting and costly. What I think they ought to do is hold a lottery, and pick one lucky WA resident who gets to decide who the governor is. PLUS, just to make it like a real lottery (big money winner), that person would have no legal restrictions upon taking money from interest groups. Just think how exciting that would be! Way better than basically giving the benefit of the doubt to one candidate because of a flip of the coin which is what is going to happen. Quote
klenke Posted November 26, 2004 Posted November 26, 2004 FW: I can't see the image. What's the specific name of the link on funlol's home/main page? I don't want to search all day on my dad's slow Internet connex. Quote
catbirdseat Posted November 26, 2004 Posted November 26, 2004 I heard on the radio (this spouted by the DNC guy in WA [truth in advertising]) that there was a Cal Tech study done showing that the error rate of these voting machines is more than 1%. So, yes, 42 out of 2.8 million (0.00004%) is a tie. A runoff election would be interesting and costly. What I think they ought to do is hold a lottery, and pick one lucky WA resident who gets to decide who the governor is. PLUS, just to make it like a real lottery (big money winner), that person would have no legal restrictions upon taking money from interest groups. Just think how exciting that would be! Way better than basically giving the benefit of the doubt to one candidate because of a flip of the coin which is what is going to happen. I think that we have to do what the LAW allows, not what seems like a good idea a the time. My understanding is that if the difference is less than 150 votes, either side can request a hand recount. It would seem to me that hand counting would be even less accurate than machine counting, but who knows? Quote
Snafflehunter Posted November 26, 2004 Posted November 26, 2004 Funny how we don't hear Republicans whining like toddlers when the Democrats win a tight one. An interesting paradox if you ask me. Quote
Eastsider Posted November 26, 2004 Posted November 26, 2004 If Gregoire does request a headcount and wins the election as a result of it, perhaps we could call her Christine "W" Gregoire... Quote
Skeezix Posted November 26, 2004 Posted November 26, 2004 Funny how we don't hear Republicans whining like toddlers when the Democrats win a tight one. An interesting paradox if you ask me. Remember when congress failed to vote for impeachment of Clinton? Who was the Republican congressmen with the penultimate whiny voice that said, "Of course he won, he always wins...?" Quote
AlpineK Posted November 26, 2004 Posted November 26, 2004 I predict a lot of whining from Republicans about how Christine should just concede. I also predict republicans convieniently forget how much they hate lawsuits and trial lawyers when they start taking every aspect of the election to court. Quote
Fairweather Posted November 26, 2004 Author Posted November 26, 2004 Nice to see you Fairweather. If you want to stay on the moral highground maybe you should give up stealing stuff. ??? Please explain. Quote
klenke Posted November 26, 2004 Posted November 26, 2004 I found the link this time. http://www.funlol.com/pictures/0182.html I think Kurt is talking about the "stealing" (hotlinking) of the seal picture from funlol's website. Quote
Fairweather Posted November 26, 2004 Author Posted November 26, 2004 That's weird. The image is showing up on my computer in the original post and the link works just fine. Is this a Mozilla issue? Quote
Camilo Posted November 26, 2004 Posted November 26, 2004 (edited) I'm not sure why Democrats keep getting called whiners all the time. Don't conservatives and/or Republicans whine a lot too? Janet Jackson's nipple shot comes to mind. Or more recently, some actress' suggestive naked back at the beginning of Monday night football. Both sides love to whine when they don't get their way. As for the election, it's a tough call. The law allows for a recount request, but that's really expensive. Some people would say to concede now is to quit while there's still a tangible chance for victory. Edit: By the way, I hope you all had a great Thanksgiving. Edited November 26, 2004 by Camilo Quote
Dru Posted November 26, 2004 Posted November 26, 2004 That's weird. The image is showing up on my computer in the original post and the link works just fine. Is this a Mozilla issue? The image is still in your temp internet files. If you clear your cookies/history/etc. you will see the same "don't steal bandwidth" image as the rest of us Quote
MisterMo Posted November 27, 2004 Posted November 27, 2004 Way better than basically giving the benefit of the doubt to one candidate because of a flip of the coin which is what is going to happen. Here in TinyTown USA we once had a city council election come out as a dead even tie (31 to 31 or some such thing). Winner was decided by a coin flip in a fun little event. The sun still comes up in the morning...well some mornings anyway in Index..... Quote
Fairweather Posted November 27, 2004 Author Posted November 27, 2004 ...but you see, one candidate did win. Dino Rossi. The election was not a tie, and anyone who wants to put forth that argument is mathematically challenged. Give it up Seattle libs! Washington State voters have spoken, and they say it's time for a change. If Christine Gregoire wants to drag this out; fine. The whole Democratic party will suffer the consequences in the next election. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.