Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
Quote
E-rock said:

And as far as climber related performance art is concerned, of course it's going to appeal to climbers, the same way climbing literature does.

.

Edited by jordop
  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

E-rock

i have thought about the artist's expression many days over... but, in my little humble opinion i think the "experiment" has run it's course and should be taken down. i am tired of seeing such an ugly display of "art" along the hillside of icicle ridge. Bullsheit. it isn't new york, seattle, san Fransico or some other gayass city. if you like it so much why don't you go buy the ugly crap and put it on your side of the mts! bigdrink.gif

btw- don't forget to apply to field job and glad to hear you guys didn't "epic" on the descent gully. How was finding the trail??? grin.gif

Posted

I thought they were some Hare Krishna flags or something when I drove by them last week - really out of place, regardless of the intrinsic artistic value.

 

If I was a neighbor, I would be PISSED! hellno3d.gifmadgo_ron.gif

Posted

More info, some of this has already been stated. This is an email my friend sent me, after I sent him this link. Thanks Ken.

 

(We) stopped at that house on the way out of the canyon to talk to the people about that stuff. We talked to this really old couple for about half and hour about it. Anyhow as is says on the thread they are going to install about 25 miles of these in Central Park in 2005. The couples son who lives in the house next door was testing them out over the past several months to check how the wind effects them and to get the weighting figured out as they are just plopped down on the ground with weights at the bottom and not buried at all in the ground. Their son works with the artist 'Cristo'. It is supposed to take about two years to install all of them I think. Anyhow we got to walk around there and take some good photos. Glad I stopped in before they took them down.
Posted (edited)

Hey E-Rock, Nice sig to one of your previous posts, 'R Mutt'.

 

Went over all these close minded dumb fucks heads, especially Kurt.

 

Anyone ever seen the documentary about the running fence?

 

 

 

Suck it haters!

 

Duchamp_Bride.jpg

Edited by COL._Von_Spanker
Posted

AAarrrgh. Please don't let them send those things to NYC. Even some of us fruit.gif over here on the wrong side of the coast don't want to see those mucking up Central Park.

 

I have a better idea. They look kind of like wands on steroids. Why not set them up on the DC route on Rainier? grin.gif

 

 

Posted
mdidriksen said:

AAarrrgh. Please don't let them send those things to NYC. Even some of us fruit.gif over here on the wrong side of the coast don't want to see those mucking up Central Park.

 

oh god, yes, i'd hate to see anyone muck up the pristine natural environment of central park. it's like, untouched by the hand of man...

Posted
gregm said:

i was saw an interview with duchamp about this piece. he said it's basically about masterbation.

 

I thought that's what most (if not all) art was about? Sex, or some derivative thereof... smileysex5.gifhahaha.gif

Posted

I can't believe the moderators in the sky haven't moved this to spray. Nice to see others have stoped and talked to the couple that are hosting these things. I guess the only thing that really bugs me about them is the pad below them. Its a hell of an uncomfortable place to chill. And the surface area adds up quick with 25 miles of them in Central Park.

Posted

Buildering First Ascents.

thats a good way to get shot in Ltown pitty.gif

 

Watch out for the lazy bastards that hand out tickets

beacuse you weren't wearing your damn SEATBELT!

evils3d.gifevils3d.gifevils3d.gif

Posted
kitten said:

erik said:

it is supposed to be art.

 

tongue.gif

It would definately be art - if you could get BUSY smileysex5.gif

under the ugly things. smirk.gif

 

No. It would be art if you could get busy under the ugly things... then talk about it later. smirk.gif

Posted

[

It would definately be art - if you could get BUSY smileysex5.gif

under the ugly things. smirk.gif

 

No. It would be art if you could get busy under the ugly things... then talk about it later. smirk.gif

What is the point in talking???

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...