KaskadskyjKozak

Drats, "foiled" again... this time by URLs. :-)))

people trying so hard to be different... and looking exactly like everyone else around them.

Stupidest place? Boston Peak or any other choss pile listed on the top 100 peaks in WA.

nice waste of resources, and useless increase of your company's carbon footprint

Gee, Rob, that's an interesting problem you've had there...

+1

The best ones I've had were on the way to Chiwawa/Fortress mountains from Trinity TH. This was in mid August two years ago, somewhere between 4000 and 5000 feet elevation. The trail is lightly used so there were tons of them.

Being inflexible and not planning for contingencies causes a lot of failures. I had to bail off Eldorado last w/e because the party wouldn't do an earlier start, farted around all day with lengthy rest stops, and refused to shoot for the summit in one day (but still camp on day 1). So when the bad weather (which was forecast!) rolled in Sunday night, we had to bail.

Gee, MoveOn will fight for congressional races. Wow. Isn't that special. Well, there's already majorities for the Dems in both houses, and... we're still in Iraq. And we'll still be there with Baracka-Billary-whatever-Dem gets elected.

I think Olyclimber spilled his latte all over the server and shorted it out. Fukin Starbucks!! I hate them!

you could crash at the Colchuck lake TH. There's even some nice spots a 100 feet or so up on the blocked off forest road at the NE side of the parking lot. No fires, of course.

I did read it. As for disputing the arguments... well the paper doesn't make the argument you make. Jim addresses this well in his response above.

linky I've seen it before... more oblivions...

Now we're getting silly. You could rephrase it - but that's not what the article said. I did read several of the articles linked to the Wickapedia site - as I stated. If you going to base your argument on "scholarly" works, and not just your opinion, then don't get caught trying to bend the words to match your opinion and then accuse others providing some solid examples that contradict your opinion as non-scholarly. Cheers. Wasn't claiming that the articles in question weren't "scholarly," but that they didn't specifically address the question under discussion. I've provided a paper which does specifically address these claims, which I invite you to read, if you wish to base your objection to my argument on the contention that it has no support in the literature. Just because you didn't read a paper that contains the argument or the data to support my claim, doesn't mean that such papers don't exist. If you're going to play that game, at least play it fairly. Again: http://www.polisci.ucla.edu/faculty/ross/doesoil.pdf I'm afraid Jim is right here... you're backpeddling...

Exactly. That fee is bogus. I pay for an annual NP pass with the add-on which covers the TH passes, and St. Helens has never been included. This may have changed this year (with a $15 hike in price) Even so, this fee still pales in comparison to the fleecing instituted by the socialist Canuck gov't.

Kevboner can not count. Kevboner does not count.

Liberal again violates rules. Remember Gore in debate

I couldn't find it on the UI for your user ID. YOu must be special. It was easy to add/remove Kevboner from ignore.

pot. kettle. black.

read the rules!!!! you can't squeeze blood from a stone.

liberalism is a mental disease You are mental! I am Spartacus!

liberalism is a mental disease

nothing is good enough for a liberal

everything is Bush's fault