KaskadskyjKozak

wow, gee, really, do you "bet" that?

There's still hope.. Colts, the Packers, maybe Dallas.

ping pong is so ghey

i was referring to an occupational hazard.

hot air! sometimes, but queefs aren't that bad

Do you do windows? depends on the compensation

talk about how Sean Alexander is a devout Christian and they might lock it...

Ladies: I have a twelve inch tongue and can breath through my ears.

Again, Matt, for your tired eyes: The studies indicate that Bush would have won any manner of recount. Now; you're trying to claim there was yet deeper fraud involved - I understand. But if that is your contention then you must take your argument to the national level and balance your "disenfranchisement" theory with opposite irregularities - like non-citizens, disenfranchised felons, deceased, duplicate, voters who did illegally vote in the 2000 election and likely lean Democrat. Are you suggesting that level of research should have been undertaken in all 50 states post-election? Mattp defines a "fair" recount by one that garners the outcome he wants, just as he defines "unbiased" reporting of the news as reporting the story he wants, the way he wants it.

I think most of us already agreed that DIEBOLD sucks donkey Schlang and should not be used. Now that we've agreed on that, we've decided to resume a dog pile/kill-the-pill style sprayfest.

Did you read the article you cite here? If you actually read what it says, rather than just the headline, it is pretty ambiguous. The bottom line: a full and fair recount applying consistent standards would have yielded Gore thet winner. Holy shit! You're kidding. Yes, I read the articles thoroughly. Are you sure you're on the same planet here? I'd be interested to hear your reasoning. It's gotta be pretty convoluted. His reading skills have also led to the conclusion that there is a systematic bias in favor of the War in Iraq and the surge "working" over the past few weeks.

no, but, well, umm, he also read that Gore really won. he read it all over the place. every place he read said that Gore won. really. not in tabloids. not left-wing print. he just can't remember where he read it right now, or provide any citations. but he did see it. really.

Now that's the most ignorant thing you've posted in a long time. Between the two, Gore is the moron and not Bush? choke, baby, choke

Yes, this was widely reported. This information is repeated on Wikipedia, along with this: Additionally, The Media Consortium hired the National Opinion Research Center to examine 175,010 ballots that were never counted in Florida. [5] The investigation took 8 months and cost $900,000.[citation needed] Their results showed that the winning candidate varied based on the method used to include or interpret ballots.[43] For cases where all of their examiners agreed, the nine different recount scenarios resulted in Bush prevailing four times, and Gore prevailing in the other five. Ironically enough, under the recount rules initially requested by Gore, Bush would have won, and under the rules requested by Bush, Gore would have won. Interesting, how you have to define the rules over and over again to get the result the "D"s wanted. All I can say is thank God that moron Gore was not elected. And I hope the D's choke on that fact all their lives.

actually, i've gone farther in answering you then I intended out of courtesy. the fact is this crap has been discussed ad nauseam both here and in public in general. you will not be convinced no matter what about 2000, so what is the point? I was surprised that any sane person actually thinks Kerry won in 2004 in OH, but I shouldn't be surprised by the depth of conspiracy-theory nuts in this country. will I argue this for the next 5 hours with you? sorry, no. enjoy your delusions. oh, and keep talking about 2000 and 2004, I'm sure that'll help the D's win in '08.

The Florida ballots were examined over and over and over again, including by biased left-winger journalists trying to overturn the results (they would benefit hugely by this if they could do it - back to the sensationalism and profit-maximization theme). The results were always the same, no matter how you looked at all those chads - Bush won. In Ohio, the margin of victory was huge and there was not enough basis to claim that election was fradulent. If there were, the lefties would have pursued this to the bitter end. I conclude they didn't because they would lose - it just didn't happen. But you can believe to the contrary all you want. Keep grasping for straws, man. As for media bias - the way the election results were reported in 2000 was a clear demonstration of that. The media wanted to discourage R turnout, and slanted the coverage to make it look unnecessary - e.g. the Fla panhandle districts. And I'll never forget the glum depressed looks on all the faces of all the major TV network news coverage when the R's took congress in 1994, or Bush was reelected, and how OPPOSITE the tone was when the gleefully reported a D victory in congress in 2006. But of course you didn't see that. Talk about ostriches.

I agree, and extend the criticism on what needs fixed beyond them.

not good. I assume you agree again?

no, but that's not the only "issue" we hear about. i'd like for all the dead people and felons to be stricken from the voter registrations as well.

Maybe we should bring in observers to monitor our elections - just like we do in other countries. No, I'm not joking.

At last we can agree on something!

also the sound made when hitting your empty skull still following me around to snipe? funny, I thought that's what I was supposed to be doing. so far today the score is 2:0. keep it up, you only prove how full of crap you are

you said 2006 was corrupted, yet your "side" won that one.

*thwack* *thwack* *thwack* (black helicopters)

Excellent points, Ketch. I believe concept of "perceived cold" is significant in Reynauds. I can be perfectly warm in the house, but the mere thought of going out for a ride or run on a cold day will cause my fingers begin to discolor. Freaky. consider a good balaclava... less cold will get to your neck/hood on your parka.