KaskadskyjKozak

You're such a joke. Really.

If only everyone would just read the books prescribed by Prole, then they would see the light, and think properly. Exposure to these truths will result in a proper and complete education. Only the insane and stupid will fail to come to the same opinions and conclusions as Prole.

"narrative" comes straight from your progressive sheeple group-think material

from "narratives" and "memes" to "bro".

19th century immigrants views have been saved fairly well and are definetly part of a basic history class - their narrative is not lost -however, their views were often no more enlightened then the natives - i'm sure you're aware of the irish hatred of blacks in new york, for example? i am not paying tribute to the 2 poles i mentioned - i also would like to live in a compassionate land that makes up for its historical evils by continuing to welcome new people - nevertheless, i would be a great fool if i did not acknowledge that, historically, the vast population of our fair republic falls into 1 of the 2 camps i described, and thus we have a situation that is unlikely to change or get better Clueless utopians have a problem with reality, especially since it always falls short of their misguided and unrealistic expectations.

You have no idea what, or how much I read, fuckwit.

Try reading a book, ya fucking meathead! or, more specifically, a set of narrow-ranged books using similar terminology, and drawing similar conclusions. Ur so smart, Prole.

"white" - race card, par for the course for progressive scum "nativist historiography" - more progressive sheeple talk

Namely, pointing out that the range of immigration debate or the voices worth listening to isn't limited to xenophobes on one end and exploiters on the other? That the immigration "problem" is mostly a fiction? Please be more specific. Only you and progressives are smart enough to define the valid parameters of discussion. Leave that narrow range and it's the same bullshit from you about how we're all dumb, duped, whatever. You and j-bot should just go find a closet somewhere for your endless circle-jerks. No, it's about broadening the range to include more voices and recognizing that what passes for a broad spectrum on any number of issues (economic policy, foreign policy, energy, etc. ) has actually been quite limited. How many examples do you need? If we're to go about solving problems and getting out of the various ruts we're in (don't worry, I know you don't personally give a fuck so nobody's asking you to think about anything), then we should try and identify the narratives that dominate our media space, how they're produced, and who benefits from them. "narrative"? You don't think that your lexicon evinces a very specific progressive group-think, and narrow-minded, homogenized world-view? Hint: the only two posters who use the term "narrative" on this site - repeatedly, I will add - are you and j_bot. Thanks for the laugh "meme"-bro.

Namely, pointing out that the range of immigration debate or the voices worth listening to isn't limited to xenophobes on one end and exploiters on the other? That the immigration "problem" is mostly a fiction? Please be more specific. Only you and progressives are smart enough to define the valid parameters of discussion. Leave that narrow range and it's the same bullshit from you about how we're all dumb, duped, whatever. You and j-bot should just go find a closet somewhere for your endless circle-jerks.

gawd, you're a whiny bitch. Ivan is about as far from conservative as you can get, but just because he doesn't toe your pathetic inflexible progressive shit-head line, you have to spew more of you ridiculous disdain. As for immigrants, the poor, etc, they're all "beneath" you anyways, so quit pretending you care about - rather than disdain - them.

neofascisticknuckledraggermoronjackassbushreagan30yearcorporateshillad-homservicegoon!

Could you pick up a sense of humor for j_bot?

Get back on your meds. It might help!

in your case it's not drool on your chin.

Liar! Liar!

Liar!

Some people thrive on them, you know? Precisely, if there is money to be made by preying on people, some demagogue will claim that it is in the name of "liberty". Precisely, some tools like you need problems to whine about incessantly as your motivation and purpose in life.

you, a most pathetic and joyless dud, wringing his hands at every problem incessantly, is calling someone else "hopeless"?

all of them caused by dismantling of the regulatory apparatus by free market zealots like KKK. more ad hominem from the oppressive neo-communistic thug!

Some people thrive on them, you know?

Do you go "high" in this pic (upper snow then over the rock)? Or drop a bit to the lower snow band? Looks like a fun go!

+1 on both. I'd love some beta on the Sherpa descent.

That's a great idea! As moderator and prime cc.com contributor, OW should climb with top-posters and help bring up the TR count through direct participation!

The billboard does not mention the mother's name nor does it show her photo. How does it violate her privacy exactly? Her name is Nani, and the organization Fultz created is listed in the bottom of the billboard as the "National Association of Needed Information." Yeah, just a coincidence. She was barely 18 when she miscarried, which means this 28 year old creep was dating a 17 year old who he went on to relentlessly stalk. I think his freedom of speech should be used to convict him of statutory rape and get him branded as a sex offender. more info Nani