KaskadskyjKozak

With scary names! Pasteurization???? That's gotta be bad for you!

sorry, I am not into your "raw diet" and shouldn't you be into a more environmentally-conscious locovore diet anyways?

funny, Prole is kneeling by one

you must be busy as pretty much every time I said anything over the last 2 years, the service goon attacked by making derogatory off-topic remarks. Spray is the OFF-TOPIC forum for a *climbing* web-site. Man you're stupid.

YOU'RE the one who brought up sweaty ballz...

no chance of that as having balls would mean having the courage to reply on topic once in a while. still waiting for you to cite the number of servings of raw milk that generated those 800 cases of food poisoning, or for you to actually name one brand and type of cheese for which you conducted your extensive taste-testing of raw milk vs. pasteurized.

On this subject, I'll take his word for it.

j_b would be the first to volunteer for a rigorous taste-test

j_bot's existence:

Mr. Small Hands can only aspire to Wiener-gate!

LOL. Sounds like a thorough study. Interesting how you can't name one raw milk cheese and one pasteurized cheese which you compared in this rigorous taste-test of yours.

j_b prefers the taste of raw human organs

Fixed that for you!

there's a lot you don't see

we already know that current Somalia is your golden age society. Yes. Raw milk, with labels => Somalia. claiming that labeling of foods or all other consumer products is unnecessary is indeed akin to proposing the Somalian model of governance your asking the question is revealing of your undemocratic ideology. THAT DOES NOT COMPUTE TO J_BOT'S TINY MICROPROCESSOR UNIT

liar. This is what I said: "Good point. CDC identified 800 cases of illnesses due to raw milk products since 1998, versus 76 millions food-borne illnesses per year." Undoubtedly you just edited that and unclicked the "edit" button to hide it. Kind of your style, j_bot. That must be why Jordan Sahl (sp?) quoted me writing "per year" at 11:46 last night. Idiot. and I read your post at 11:30 last night before you edited, f-tard.

What shitty logic. The high price of imported cheeses is due to tariffs, the strength of the Euro, and artisanal methods. So tell us, asshole, what cheeses you eat that are raw milk vs. non, where they come from and how much they cost. Or, you could just STFU for once.

Nope. Non BGH milk, organic and non, is available at any grocery store. Several grocery chains changed their store brands to non-rBGH years ago.

liar. This is what I said: "Good point. CDC identified 800 cases of illnesses due to raw milk products since 1998, versus 76 millions food-borne illnesses per year." Undoubtedly you just edited that and unclicked the "edit" button to hide it. Kind of your style, j_bot.

I never said raw milk tasted better since I have not drunk raw milk in 40+ years but I have eaten plenty of raw milk cheeses over that period and I can tell the difference (and I am far from being the only person who can tell as most food expert would confirm). Pasteurization kills all bacteria, good and bad, that are necessary for a cheese to age properly. Bacteria are added after pasteurization to allow aging to occur but nowhere with the variety and quantity needed to form the perfect cheese. Lesson over. Now I have work to do. Your raw milk cheese probably costs $25 a pound and is imported from France, so of course it tastes better. Why don't you post some details - like what cheese you purchased, how much it cost, where it was made, and to what cheese you are comparing it to.

And 300 million Americans eat multiple servings of food a day, so 76 million cases of food-born illness for such a large population over years would be reasonable too - you half-witted fucktard. First, you can't fucking read as the 76 million foodborne illnesses is per year. Second, there is a ~5 orders of magnitude difference between 76 millions and 800, so even if you assume 10000 servings of all foods versus 1 of raw milk, you get 10 times more contamination with other foods. Finally, nobody claimed it was a perfect comparison but it is instructive nonetheless. Now fuck off, troll. You made no such comment on duration (1 year). You posted a bullshit claim with no specific details and then eventually a link. FOAD, j_bot.

And 300 million Americans eat multiple servings of food a day, so 76 million cases of food-born illness for such a large population over years would be reasonable too - you half-witted fucktard.

800 cases out of 80000 servings as opposed to 76 million cases out of 76 billion servings of food? Just throw stats around j_bot... w/o the requisite details to provide appropriate meaning/context. it doesn't take a clairvoyant to understand nobody knows the number of servings, retard. Just a minor detail, eh fuck face? 800 cases out of 800 servings sounds pretty bad. 800 out of 8 million, a lot better. Comparing 800 to 76 millions without appropriate context is meaningless. But I understand that your mental illness may prevent such understanding.

800 cases out of 80000 servings as opposed to 76 million cases out of 76 billion servings of food? Just throw stats around j_bot... w/o the requisite details to provide appropriate meaning/context.

blowing hard is your forte