One positive point is that I believe they actually traded a little bit of valley bottom for the little bit of alpine ridge that they got. This is a good thing, as much of our provincial parks are simply rocks and snow.
I doubt that this is going to be anything like Silverton, Flute bowl is almost in bounds any ways and sees a lot of skier traffic already. Really they are just looking after runs that they already provide access too, probably at the advice of their lawyers.
I thought that the original plans were for a new lift in Flute Bowl, and am puzzled at why they ixnayed that??? Perhaps they are trying to create a sort of buffer zone of controlled hiking?
ashw_justin said:
Sure, but the number of skiers that they have up there on a given day can sure make a mess of all the runs in a day.
A large chunk of this expansion is the Peak to Creek runs. These were cut several years ago, just before Intrawest bought Whistler Mountain, and were never officially opened. To call this the largest expansion is true in a way, but also a lot of marketing hype. It's not like they are cutting any new runs or putting in any new chairs. :rolleye:
stinkyclimber said:
I think Garabaldi Park is under a ton of pressure. The snowmobile clubs would love to get in there, the heli skiers are in there already, the Air Tours (Whistler or Glacier - can't remember) land illegaly in the park, there is heavy usage of a lot of the frontcountry areas, and poaching by snogos, mountain bikes, and dog walkers. It is a large park in easy distance from a major urban centre, and has to endure a lot of use and abuse. Then there is the little chunks that get carved off every once in a whil eto expand the ski areas...
I doubt that Whistler will go much further in to the park, but Blackcomb has a ton of good terrain out there. All they would need to do is redraw the Blackcomb Glacier Park boundaries.