Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Trip: Colfax Peak - Cosley-Houston

 

Date: 10/19/2008

 

Trip Report:

Climbed Cosley-Houston with Chad A. Route is in good shape. Climbed it in three pitches, one ~70m pitch to the top of the first pillar, another long pitch to the top of the second pillar and a long simul-pitch to the top. Nothing but water ice and neve. Climb would actually be several pitches longer but we simuled when needed to the top of the pillars and simuled the top pitch. Conservative estimate if fully pitched out... 6-7 pitches.

 

Polish Route looks like it needs more time. The upper curtain and upper pillar appear to not be formed together. Certainly looked WI6 with possible mixed climbing on the uber-solid rock of the black buttes.

 

16.jpg

 

23.jpg

 

33.jpg

 

42.jpg

 

52.jpg

 

Gear Notes:

Brought 9 ice screws, used 7. Brought three pins, three stoppers, two small cams. Used one cam, one pin, one stopper. Could use a picket, but can definately get by without it.

Edited by Farrgo
  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
nice! explains your absence from beacon this weekend :)

 

that there is a big old heap of driving for 3 pitches of ice, eh? :P

 

That's three "long" pitches of ice. Just goes to show an addict will do anything for a fix.

 

 

CC - I was wondering who was behind us. I snapped a pic of you guys as well, I might not come out though because the sun was directly behind Colfax at the point. I'd love to see it, if you want to load it online.

Posted

A few more pics.

 

You guys correct me if I'm wrong, but you were simul-climbing on all the pitches, including when the leader was on the crux pillars (which were much harder than they appeared from below or in the pics). I just don't want anyone to think you can get from the base to the top of the first crux, and from that belay to the belay above the second crux on a 70 meter rope.

 

Here I think you are setting your first belay. You can see that the second had to climb through the first pitch crux while the leader was on the pillar.

IMG_4364edited.jpg

 

Here the leader is at the base of the second pillar. I think the belayer is in the process of pulling the belay to simul.

IMG_4366edited.jpg

 

Me leading on the first pitch, which was very fun.

IMG_4378edited.jpg

 

Jens leading the second pillar, which was harder than it looks, plus there is camera tilt.

IMG_4382edited.jpg

Posted

You guys correct me if I'm wrong, but you were simul-climbing on all the pitches, including when the leader was on the crux pillars (which were much harder than they appeared from below or in the pics). I just don't want anyone to think you can get from the base to the top of the first crux, and from that belay to the belay above the second crux on a 70 meter rope.

 

That'd be correct, CC. Thanks for posting the pics! Yes, we did stretch things out; we felt comfortable with it.

 

Nice to be on ice this early, huh? :)

Posted
That'd be correct, CC. Thanks for posting the pics! Yes, we did stretch things out; we felt comfortable with it.

 

Nice to be on ice this early, huh? :)

 

Sure is. You two are in solid shape for early season- those two cruxes were not trivial. Good job!

Posted
[sure is. You two are in solid shape for early season- those two cruxes were not trivial. Good job!

 

Thanks- same back to ya ;)

 

As far as the ratings go, that's always tough for me to nail down. What are your thoughts, CC?

 

Here's my take- just as CC says, they're both considerably tougher than they look from below. That said, I'd guess that the first one was 4+, second one solid 4. Both are relatively short lived, but the ice is funky.

Posted (edited)

The first pillar had a short section that was vertical. My measure tool of choice for such things is my hands, which became mostly useless for things like cleaning screws and holding tools. They voted again when I reached the belay with a nice early-season bout of the dreaded thaw. The sticks on the first pillar were okay, but it was running wet, which was something of a mystery to me given the temps in the low 20s and the lack of any creeks or streams on Colfax Peak. I agree with 4+, mostly because it was short.

 

The second pillar was brittle and dry with crappy sticks and gear, but defintely off-vertical and with decent feet. 3 or 3+ with fat plastic ice. Agree with 4 as it was.

 

It's a great route with lots of climbing like on the North Face of Chair, but with two spicey zingers tossed in and a better view.

 

The most dangerous part of the day was walking down the toe of the glacier at dusk after all the exposed ice had frozen hard and smooth. Falling there would be very painful and likely fatal.

 

Whoever stole Jens' shoes, trekking pole, and crampon pouch from the bottom of the glacier is an ass-clown. May you be cursed with 1000 soaking wet unplanned bivies.

 

Edit to add: This may be the first time I've climbed an alpine ice route in the cascades where the was absolutely no sugar-snow-over-rock crappiness to deal with. The entire route was either water ice or great neve. My calves are screaming today.

Edited by CascadeClimber
Posted

Wow, busy day on Colfax Sunday.

 

I was up there with BundledUpSurfer climbing Colfax and Baker via the standard routes (we are pictured in the above photo on the Roman Wall). We were jealous of you guys getting on the route.

Posted

Nice climbing, all! dtaylor offered an explanation for the presence of water ice in the absence of water, but I'm too lazy to track it down.

 

Regarding the stolen gear, the ravens are notorious in that area. They once opened my pack lid, stole all my food and a first aid kit, and shit on my pack as a thank you. Most likely the case with your stuff, IMHO.

Posted
explanation for the presence of water ice in the absence of water,

 

I would hazard it has something to do with

 

snow+sunlight = melt

melt+fractured bedrock = groundwater

groundwater+cliff band = seepage

Posted

There is an unusual amount of running water on the first pillar, given:

 

1. It was 20F and the night had been quite cold.

2. There is no creek or stream above.

3. The second pillar was quite dry in comparison and in the same gully.

4. It's on a north aspect and only the last 50 feet of the route gets any direct sun this time of year.

 

But we digress: It's a fun, long water ice route in Washington state and it's in. In October. Go climb it. Just watch out for those gear-stealing ravens and don't climb directly under another party.

Posted
There is an unusual amount of running water on the first pillar, given:

 

1. It was 20F and the night had been quite cold.

 

The important temperature in this case is the one inside the mountain.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...