genepires Posted February 17, 2015 Posted February 17, 2015 Gene, you miss the point of the exercise, which is that libtard political correctness has become so convoluted and confusing that nobody knows what to say or think these days. This was the point of the theater speech reply as well. The fact that you unhinged yourself with the Islam example reveals something about you and your fellow libs that was, well, exactly my point. it is not about PC but people saying stupid things which is the FW / Fox news usual mode. There is reality and there is the stupid crap and lies spread by our countries Right /conserva-nutz. Quote
Fairweather Posted February 17, 2015 Author Posted February 17, 2015 Lies? Like that Oregon libnut governor? or that Libtard hater who killed three people? Where was your outrage, Gene! Quote
Fairweather Posted February 17, 2015 Author Posted February 17, 2015 Ever consider the possibility that you are but one of the <1% or so that don't "know what to say or think" anymore?. Instead of "nobody knows what to say or think"?? maybe i'm too liberal, but i don't think the government or anybody else should be able to tell me how to think or what to believe, and if i want that freedom, i can't in good faith deny it to others so....feel free to scream to the mountain-tops your towering hatred of jews, gentiles, n' dirty-dirty towel-heads, i don't care - everything changes when you put your hand to them though, and then the punishment should be as swift and severe as would be for any other clueless twat Um, no, Doug, not really. Like Ivan, I don't really care what the libtards (or the thumpers) tell me I should think or what I am allowed to say. Quote
genepires Posted February 17, 2015 Posted February 17, 2015 Lies? Like that Oregon libnut governor? or that Libtard hater who killed three people? Where was your outrage, Gene! I don't need any outrage. the courts are dealing with it. Quote
genepires Posted February 17, 2015 Posted February 17, 2015 Lies? or that Libtard hater who killed three people? Where was your outrage, Gene! once again pointing out the lies. where is the evidence that this guy (craig hicks I assume) is a liberal? claims he has no political affiliation and if you were to look for a group to associate him with, it would be gun loving angry assholes. http://www.buzzfeed.com/davidmack/everything-we-know-so-far-about-the-alleged-chapel-hill-shoo#.kcWyD3V1E def of liberal: Classical liberalism, a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties. This does not sound like Craig Hicks by any stretch of imagination. So go ahead and call him a liberal if you want, but he is not one. Quote
ivan Posted February 17, 2015 Posted February 17, 2015 i've always preferred Ambrose Bierce's definitions "Conservative, n. A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with others." Quote
dougd Posted February 17, 2015 Posted February 17, 2015 Well, considering it seems harmless enough... Our thoughts are our own until we release them of course, but then, we should at least be somewhat prepared to explain them, and when we employ sweeping generalities in our statements, explaining the meaning can be darn difficult... Still a bit confused on the whole "_____ tell me I should think or what I am allowed to say" thing, or why it would be allowed to become an issue for someone... Let er rip I say, but be ready. Quote
genepires Posted February 17, 2015 Posted February 17, 2015 I don't really care what the libtards (or the thumpers) tell me I should think or what I am allowed to say. of course you are allowed to think or say what you want. (within reason such as the "Fire" example) I believe our constitution has sections dedicated to this. But these protections of thought and speech are there for everyone else. So why do you attack so many people for speaking their minds? and use slander? Quote
Fairweather Posted February 17, 2015 Author Posted February 17, 2015 Gene, note that I have repeatedly prefaced American liberal as a contemporary marker (versus classical, Enlightenment, etc). It's very confusing for you, I'm sure. As for the rest, I guess I'll just have to leave it to you to come up with some really interesting stats on left vs right "slander" here on cc.com. Quote
Fairweather Posted February 17, 2015 Author Posted February 17, 2015 i've always preferred Ambrose Bierce's definitions "Conservative, n. A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with others." Perfect. Quote
ivan Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 so long as we're talking about rogue idiots representing their professed ideologies... http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/02/18/oklahoma-ap-history-class-under-fire-for-omitting-american-exceptionalism/?intcmp=latestnews Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 Liberalism has finally succumbed to it's thousandth cut I see. Thanks, Bootzhaber. The real Ted Turner could have pulled it off. Sure, you were replaced by the nation's first openly bisexual woman governor, but she's obviously a GOP mole. Quote
Fairweather Posted February 20, 2015 Author Posted February 20, 2015 Talk about confusing: A "bisexual" woman, married to a man while practicing a monogamous, heterosexual relationship? Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 How many bisexual people do you know? Quote
genepires Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 Talk about confusing: A "bisexual" woman, married to a man while practicing a monogamous, heterosexual relationship? there was some show on TV about homosexual men married to a woman while practicing a monogamous heterosexual relationship, cause God told them they needed to live that way. At least a bisexual woman can be attracted the man she married. Quote
genepires Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 Lies? or that Libtard hater who killed three people? Where was your outrage, Gene! once again pointing out the lies. where is the evidence that this guy (craig hicks I assume) is a liberal? claims he has no political affiliation and if you were to look for a group to associate him with, it would be gun loving angry assholes. http://www.buzzfeed.com/davidmack/everything-we-know-so-far-about-the-alleged-chapel-hill-shoo#.kcWyD3V1E This does not sound like Craig Hicks is a liberal by any stretch of imagination. So go ahead and call him a liberal if you want, but he is not one. not that it really matters but where is the evidence that this Hicks maniac is a liberal or even a democrat or even political in any way? Quote
Fairweather Posted February 20, 2015 Author Posted February 20, 2015 How many bisexual people do you know? I have no idea. Quote
Fairweather Posted February 20, 2015 Author Posted February 20, 2015 (edited) not that it really matters but where is the evidence that this Hicks maniac is a liberal or even a democrat or even political in any way? Hmmm, sounds about 80% libtard/20% anarchist to me: http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/12/us/chapel-hill-shooting-suspect-craig-hicks/index.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/11/craig-stephen-hicks-atheism_n_6661438.html Edited February 20, 2015 by Fairweather Quote
Fairweather Posted February 20, 2015 Author Posted February 20, 2015 Libtard Flavor of the Week: Quote
AlpineK Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 The links you provide make the Hicks fellow sound disturbed and angry. Now how does this make him democratic or liberal? I don't see any mention of a party allegiance either left or right. Quote
Fairweather Posted February 20, 2015 Author Posted February 20, 2015 I don't recall saying he was a Democrat. Just a libtard. Quote
genepires Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 not that it really matters but where is the evidence that this Hicks maniac is a liberal or even a democrat or even political in any way? Hmmm, sounds about 80% libtard/20% anarchist to me: http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/12/us/chapel-hill-shooting-suspect-craig-hicks/index.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/11/craig-stephen-hicks-atheism_n_6661438.html that makes sense. all liberals are atheists and all atheists are liberals. good logic on ya. but he is also a gun loving asshole. sounds conservative to me. Quote
AlpineK Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 I don't recall saying he was a Democrat. Just a libtard. Call it what you will, I still don't see the evidence. Being a wacko knows no allegiance. Quote
Fairweather Posted February 20, 2015 Author Posted February 20, 2015 not that it really matters but where is the evidence that this Hicks maniac is a liberal or even a democrat or even political in any way? Hmmm, sounds about 80% libtard/20% anarchist to me: http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/12/us/chapel-hill-shooting-suspect-craig-hicks/index.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/11/craig-stephen-hicks-atheism_n_6661438.html that makes sense. all liberals are atheists and all atheists are liberals. good logic on ya. but he is also a gun loving asshole. sounds conservative to me. Thank you, gene, for confirming once again the bizarre logic of the left. :[] At least Alpine K has the decency to use the libtard fallback position. Quote
Off_White Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 Yeah, and Ted Bundy was a Republican, so what's your point? Do you propose collating the political affiliation of everyone in the U.S. who's done terrible things, assign some numeric value based on a "horrific index" and create an average, thereby giving us some sort of metric which we'll use to assess the value of various policy initiatives? Who exactly is on parade here? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.