shaoleung Posted June 14, 2012 Author Share Posted June 14, 2012 well, if you trained a bit, instead crying on the bb about your weak pansy ass bitch arms, you could join the ranks. Dude I'm so on it. I picked up a pair of 7.5 lb dumbbells from good will. Once I can do more than 3 pull ups, I'll switch to pulling on the tree branches. Budgeted for wax and oil. Practicing my warm smile. Yeah baby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glassgowkiss Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 I think way better way is drytooling your rod with both left and right arm while reading cc.com tr's, for a full forearm pump. you'll get inspired by another 5.6 ascent of the choss in the rain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 quality stuff there polishbob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 well, if you trained a bit, instead crying on the bb about your weak pansy ass bitch arms, you could join the ranks. Dude I'm so on it. I picked up a pair of 7.5 lb dumbbells from good will. Once I can do more than 3 pull ups, I'll switch to pulling on the tree branches. Budgeted for wax and oil. Practicing my warm smile. Yeah baby. You can't fly like an eagle with wings of a wren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyson.g Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 Dude I'm so on it. I picked up a pair of 7.5 lb dumbbells from good will. Once I can do more than 3 pull ups, I'll switch to pulling on the tree branches. Budgeted for wax and oil. Practicing my warm smile. Yeah baby. Try This instead.......... [video:youtube] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaoleung Posted June 15, 2012 Author Share Posted June 15, 2012 Tyson - Wanna go in on the two fer one deal on this one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyson.g Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 Man, thanks and yes I was hoping someone would ask. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaoleung Posted June 15, 2012 Author Share Posted June 15, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 there is a high level of retardation in this thread. can we still say "retard?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denalidave Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 there is a high level of retardation in this thread. can we still say "retard?" I'm spesho Beatard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyson.g Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 there is a high level of retardation in this thread. can we still say "retard?" I think it is similar to only being able to say the N word if you are black. So you should be clear rob. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 I'm also part black. Guess which part? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 can we still say "retard?" my new word-crush of the week, from hbo's "veep," is, in reference to a true fool, "weapons-grade retard." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 back to an important question: what is the specific definition to the word "douche bag" that we are referring to? And what specifically makes the bag worse than the actual douche? And a douche its self isn't so bad, its only when it gets used? Also the term seems a little sexist, I would prefer a little more gender neutral idiom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 though to be precise, a douche is typically used on any body cavity...so I guess it is gender neutral enough. thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 Ironically, although women USE douches, they are never referred to as being "douches" or "douchebags" themselves -- so I would argue that the term actually only only carries masculine connotations. You lose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 testing: Rob, don't be an ACTUAL DOUCHE. NOT THE BAG THAT IT IS CONTAINED IN. zing. i think it actually works pretty well. thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 people never ponder on the important things... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 Porter, if you're going to refer to the liquid, you can't be "a douche", you are just "douche" -- lose the article. Would you say, "Oh no, the nozzle fell out and a douche got all over the floor" ?? No, you wouldn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 This thread rocks. I am a loss for words for this very important thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaoleung Posted June 15, 2012 Author Share Posted June 15, 2012 back to an important question: what is the specific definition to the word "douche bag" that we are referring to? And what specifically makes the bag worse than the actual douche? And a douche its self isn't so bad, its only when it gets used? Also the term seems a little sexist, I would prefer a little more gender neutral idiom. "Santorum wipe"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 Porter, if you're going to refer to the liquid, you can't be "a douche", you are just "douche" -- lose the article. Would you say, "Oh no, the nozzle fell out and a douche got all over the floor" ?? No, you wouldn't. its true. douche is more of a verb than a noun. but then there is the bag. that bag complicates things. here is a kit, and the bag is right there on the bottom. but what, pray tell, is so bad about it? you could say it was a bag the held a douche nozzle and a douche pump. nothing wrong there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 damned cunning linguists Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 i just went back and found a spelling/language error in my post. it is now corrected, enjoy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.