Dave_Schuldt Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 FUCKING AWSOME!!!!! THOSE WHO VOTED NO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son_of_Caveman Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 I have no problem with it. Seattle needs some help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshK Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 we need mass transit badly in this city. I fear the monorail plan, however, isn't going to do shit to help traffic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlpineK Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 Fuck yeah!!! Monorail!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_by_Northwest Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 Traffic? I thought the new monorail was to help avoid DUIs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 Monorail Yes! (Since I don't live there) ...But you don't think Seattlites will actually vote to pay for something themselves do you? Out of their own pockets? Surely, there must be a way to get the good people of Washington State to foot the bill for Seattle's monorail! ...I know! Let's set up a tri-county taxing district! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_by_Northwest Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 Sell the SeaHawks, wait no, they're not worth anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allison Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 Seattle residents aren't really that taxaphobic, FW. That latest Eyman initiative didn't pass here, for example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtnnut Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 It would probably be more effective for reducing traffic if downtown commuters were just paid to stay home one day a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 Actually, a monorail extension would be cool. And a good tourism draw too. Good for business. Â I hope Seattle can muster up the same courage to pay for a new AK Way viaduct without calling on state taxpayers as well. Especially since the people who will drive the new Tacoma Narrows are "on their own", financially speaking. Â Peace, Allison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allison Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 It's not a monorail extension. It's a whole new system. My understanding is the old Alweg 'rail won't be part of it. Â I wouldn't put money on the city rebuilding the Viaduct without outside help. Anyway you all need that to get to the ballparks that happen to be here that we didn't want or vote for. Â So when my Mom is in town, we'll ride the Momorail, but what about Dad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
offwidthclimber Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 yeah, what's a 'MOMORAIL'? Â now, what about I-5, 99, 420, 520...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregm Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 FOOLS! it will never work. enclosed bike tunnels with tailwind ventilation are the only solution.  The Future of Mass Transportation   Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelawgoddess Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 quote: Originally posted by North by Northwest: Sell the SeaHawks, wait no, they're not worth anything. Â seriously, though, won't it be cool when all we need to do is say "beam me up, scotty"? Â sometimes this city is SOOO behind the times ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegetablebelay Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 quote: Originally posted by gregm: FOOLS! it will never work. enclosed bike tunnels with tailwind ventilation are the only solution. Behold...... the future  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbw1966 Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 Looks like he's sporting wood. Must be some ride he's got going on there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegetablebelay Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 quote: Originally posted by rbw1966: Looks like he's sporting wood. Must be some ride he's got going on there. You stil worry me Rob.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbw1966 Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 I knew as soon as I posted that it would get me in trouble. Â Its ok though. I'm married. To a woman. I'm not gay, really. Not that there is anything wrong with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegetablebelay Posted November 20, 2002 Share Posted November 20, 2002 No wait, here is the future.....   www.solotrek.com  "What is SoloTrek XFV?  SoloTrek XFV (Exoskeleton Flying Vehicle) is a brand new kind of transportation device that you step on, strap on, and fly. This ultra-compact aircraft lets you takeoff vertically, dash to your destination, then land literally anywhere. Using readily available fuel, SoloTrek XFV can hover for over 2 hours, reach speeds of up to 69 mph, and traverse distances over 100 miles. SoloTrek XFV has been designed to be safe, easy to fly, and easy to maintain. This practical solution to individual VTOL flight holds promising applications in the military, paramilitary and civilian markets. "   [ 11-20-2002, 02:49 PM: Message edited by: vegetablebelay ] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Schuldt Posted November 21, 2002 Author Share Posted November 21, 2002 Cool link, gregm, however, people are so lazy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry_Pi Posted November 21, 2002 Share Posted November 21, 2002 quote: Originally posted by rbw1966: I knew as soon as I posted that it would get me in trouble. Â Its ok though. I'm married. To a woman. I'm not gay, really. Not that there is anything wrong with that. And beautiful wife you have, you must be verly proud to post her picture under you name rbw1966. Â [ 11-20-2002, 10:37 PM: Message edited by: Harry Pi ] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
To_The_Top Posted November 21, 2002 Share Posted November 21, 2002 Â [ 11-21-2002, 05:44 AM: Message edited by: To The Top ] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.