Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can you explain this? This person was named as a respondant. Is he the one who is being ordered by the state, or is his girlfriend?

 

 

 

Superior Court Case Summary

 

 

Court: King Co Superior Ct

Case Number: 09-2-xxxxxxx

 

Sub Docket Date Docket Code Docket Description Misc Info

12-xx-2009 $NF Non Fee

1 12-xx-2009 PTORAH Pet For Or Of Protection-harassment

2 12-xx-2009 CICS

LOCS Case Information Cover Sheet

Original Location - Seattle

3 12-xx-2009 TMORAH

Ex Par Temp Antihar Protec Ord/nhrg

/issd 01-xx-2010AN

EXP0001 Ex-parte, Dept

4 12-xx-2009 MTWVF Motion For Waiver Of Fees

5 12-xx-2009 ORALFF

EXP0001 Or Proceed W/o Paymt Of Fees-harass

Ex-parte, Dept

6 01-xx-2010 RTS Return Of Service

7 01-xx-2010 ORAH Or For Prot From Civil Harass/issd

 

 

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Shouldn't it be $100? I asked the question in my initial post, yet you took two posts to come up with a responce. If you had been on the ball, your chargeable time would have been 50% of what they now are.

 

 

Posted
sheesh, asking for legal advice in spray is like asking the dope dealer to help you clean up.

 

it's a non-sequitar?

 

Hugh, if that was intentional, it was hysterical.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...