olyclimber Posted February 12, 2008 Author Posted February 12, 2008 someone being dense, that is true. but its ok, run away and hide. actually, it does make a pretty good point for several sides, one of them is Mr. Huckabee...he has good cause for his lawsuit with a fucknut like this in charge of the voting. that is FACT. as for your licksack comment, its pretty well documented that tired phrase only makes you look like an idiot, but continue using it if you want to drive that point home. Quote
Crux Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 Who is that tax-raising, big-spending, arms-for-hostages, cut-and-run, America-hating ugly dude in picture there making fun of Ronald Reagan? Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 someone being dense, that is true. but its ok, run away and hide. actually, it does make a pretty good point for several sides, one of them is Mr. Huckabee...he has good cause for his lawsuit with a fucknut like this in charge of the voting. that is FACT. as for your licksack comment, its pretty well documented that tired phrase only makes you look like an idiot, but continue using it if you want to drive that point home. whatever, dude. it's pretty hard to tell when you are being anything other than a wiseacre/joker. as for your facts, sorry, but I don't believe whatever some random dudes toss out on the interwebs - especially when their POV is so clearly biased. if I ever saw you (or MattP) put even one iota of balance into your "outrage" or criticisms of political figures, processes, and other "facts", why I might actually take your POV more seriously. But as it stands you're about as one-sided, myopic, black-and-white-my-side -right-good-and-swell-your-side-bad-evil-wrong as can be. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 the guy that beat that crap out of idiot liberal jelly-fish loser, failed economic and international policies Jimmy peanut-farmer Carter, as well as big tax and spend liberal gots no ideas or personality yet alone viable agenda for America Fritz Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 guess you didn't get the memo about stalking flames, huh, asswipe? Quote
rob Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 come on guys, make love not war I've got a bunch of bootleg dead tapes we can listen to at my place ifn you wanna Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 zimzam - you completely lost me there. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 yes but will you break out the basyl hayden's? Quote
rob Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 yes but will you break out the basyl hayden's? sure, we can fill my bong with it Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 if you want smoky whisky, you should be drinking an Islay, man! Quote
olyclimber Posted February 12, 2008 Author Posted February 12, 2008 i really don't care what you think of my point of view. i didn't claim any "facts" other than douche counting the republican votes wrote what matt said he did, which you dismissed as "its on a blog, why should i believe that". i am being balanced in that I think the Republicans in Washington deserve to have their votes counted, and its obviously from that article that Esser is douchebag who doesn't care about fairness...only about winning. Obviously he isn't the only one with that problem. What I don't understand is what problem you have admitting that Esser wrote that article or admitting that his vote counting pratices are questionable in what was a close race for WA repubs. I just don't understand why you're so quick to dismiss that. i'm perfectly willing to be humble and admit where I'm wrong. but I don't need to do that in this case, because, I'm not wrong. How is it "one-sided, myopic, black-and-white-my-side-right-good-and-swell-your-side-bad-evil-wrong as can be."? Do tell me of the virtues of Esser! I'm all ears and prepared to humbly admit I was wrong. But unless you produce, you're full of shit and I don't appreciate your baseless name calling. Quote
pink Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 Yep... a great American Hero! http://zzpat.tripod.com/ Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 MattP's oft-repeated tactic (and yours apparently) is to change the subject. A criticism was made of someone - a poster - a real person here ADMITTING to undermining our election process. And your and MattP's response is to say that some dude somewhere allegedly is undermining the process, blah blah blah. So, assuming that that blog is "correct" and your "fact" is true, then your argument is what exactly? Two wrongs make a fucking right? I call bullshit on that. As for black vs. white - the FACTS are that both "sides" are doing all kinds of shit to subvert the process across the country, including your beloved, innocent-as-driven-snow Dems. I reject all shenanigans uniformly and want them all corrected but will not be focusing on ONE SIDE EXCLUSIVELY as the lefties on this side continuously do, nor will I be lead around by the nose following are your little links and blogs and whatever. That tactic might work for lawyers in court as they badger a witness, but not for me in a free-form forum. Sorry. Quote
mattp Posted February 12, 2008 Posted February 12, 2008 MattP's oft-repeated tactic (and yours apparently) is to change the subject. ... I call bullshit on that. WTF? KK: Hello. I AGREED with you, dude. I don't approve of the sabotage suggested by Marylou. You've argued that it is those on the Left that seek to cheat more than those on the right. I don't think you or Fairweather can claim any high ground here, that's for sure, and I CERTAINLY don't think the Republicans can claim any superiority in ths regard over the course of the last several elections -- except that they've been better cheaters. Good luck with that argument. Carry on. Quote
olyclimber Posted February 12, 2008 Author Posted February 12, 2008 I'm not changing the conversation, the thread forked at what Matt posted, which I found infinitely more interesting than the thread topic before that. Please go back and review every thread in spray...it happens in almost every thread. The conversation goes to another topic. I have nothing to say about what happened previously in this thread. Get over that. I fail to see how I'm being partisan here. I'm actually concerned about the elections, regardless which political party it applies too. How is that partisan? How is that "leftist"? Quote
olyclimber Posted February 12, 2008 Author Posted February 12, 2008 crickets. well i'm waiting for you to recant the shit you said about me... Quote
olyclimber Posted February 12, 2008 Author Posted February 12, 2008 did the balloon get a hole? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.