Jump to content

government control - good? bad?


lI1|1!

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's uncanny. Every time someone mentions drug legalization, the evil HEROIN comes up.

 

I used to play squash several times a week with a cop. We'd discuss drug policy, among other things. He told me that the public's concern over heroin was a joke...heroin addicts are some of the most docile people on the planet, and addict related crime is blown way, way out of proportion.

 

The 'heroin problem' in this country, and most countries, for that matter, is so laughably small it shouldn't even be on our radar screen. Compare the 100 or so annual heroin overdose deaths to the many tens of thousands of alcohol related accidents, homocides, and health related deaths and you'll see what I mean.

 

And hey, last time a checked, alcohol was legal.

 

You could legalize every hard drug there is and the average person wouldn't notice any change in their daily lives whatsoever. It's simply not a major problem, particularly as compared to all the other monumental issues we face today. We shouldn't be spending a dime trying to 'solve' it.

Edited by tvashtarkatena
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you become an herion addict just b/c it was legal and marketed? )robably not. Most people feel the same way.

 

Plus, wasn't the whole discussion about super thin models not affecting the anorexic population "proof" that marketing doesn't bare the responsibility for causing its consumers to copy behavior?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"proof"?

 

I think if heroin were legal and easily obtainable, there would be more heroin addicts. I think that if heroin were aggressively marketed as a good way to get chicks and a fun way to hang by the pool, that a few more sales would be made.

 

Could be wrong though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

heroin is semi-legal (controlled but tolerated) in several European countries, most notably Switzerland. The addiction rate did not go up as a result of legalization. They also have fewer addicts per capita than the U.S.

 

In our own country, cocaine and heroin was legal until the 1930s. Use was widespread until the early part of this century. Laws did not hault the popularity of these drugs, a public information campaign about the risks of these drugs did. Criminal drug laws didn't come into play until much later.

 

People who have a need to 'self medicate' will do so. Those who do not, won't, whether a drug is legal or not.

Edited by tvashtarkatena
Link to comment
Share on other sites

heroin is semi-legal (controlled but tolerated) in several European countries, most notably Switzerland. The addiction rate did not go up as a result of legalization. They also have fewer addicts per capita than the U.S.

 

In our own country, cocaine and heroin was legal until the 1930s. Use was widespread until the early part of this century. Laws did not hault the popularity of these drugs, a public information campaign about the risks of these drugs did. Criminal drug laws didn't come into play until much later.

 

People who have a need to 'self medicate' will do so. Those who do not, won't, whether a drug is legal or not.

 

England also has a very sensible way to deal with their heroin users. There are many options. Ours don't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm what an interesting question. I wonder if the number of heroin-related accidents and homicides would go up if it was legal and aggressively marketed like alcohol is?

 

Hmmmm.....

 

There was certainly no demand for alcohol or alcoholism anywhere in the world before the advent of the modern media. Take away advertising and there'd be no demand for anything.

 

Actually, I think if you account for all of the homicides perpetrated by the various cartels and their hit-men in the countries where the drugs are produced, you'd see a significant reduction in the number of homicides in those countries. Not to mention dramatically reducing the effects of narco-corruption and intimidation on law enforcement, politicians, and the judiciary in those states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK you guys have sold me. When are we going to show those stupid socialist Euro's who's the smartest by doing just what they do with respect to civil liberties concerning access to heroin?

 

Your hero Bush should be on this pronto!

 

(that was not intended to be a Bush-cocaine joke)

Edited by chucK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not much hope for that if there's people who are in favor of suing alcohol and tobacco companies out of existence - despite the fact that the risks have been none to anyone who is not literally retarded for over four decades, and both have been perfectly legal for far longer - is there? This is at least as much of an obstacle as the moralistic barriers to legalizing drugs.

 

Not sure that Euroland is the best model for all freedoms, considering the restrictions on speech, firearms, etc that persist there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said, "there are people in favor of" suing the companies out of existence. Words have meanings. The meanings of the phrases "there are people in favor of" and "there are" are not equal. You are directing a weak jibe at a point that I did not actually make. Clever fellow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...