archenemy Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 yours, pointed at you first, then up there (and maybe at them too). Then they confront you with the finger. My, what a shock(er)! Quote
Alasdair Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 I was in SAR 10 years ago and probably half the time our pagers went off it was to look for runaway Alzheimers patients. Yea its still that way. Quote
klenke Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 Alasdair, can we read your letter here in case the P-I doesn't publish it? Quote
sobo Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 I was in SAR 10 years ago and probably half the time our pagers went off it was to look for runaway Alzheimers patients. Yea its still that way. Ditto here in central WA. That, and people getting drunk and falling in the river/irrigation canals. And lost hikers. Quote
Mal_Con Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 Ditto in the Sierra, there it was usually hikers caught in an early snow storm at high elevation. Quote
mattp Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 I believe the reason operations involving lost hikers and hunters typically cost more than climber rescues has to do with the "search" part of search and rescue. Large numbers of people are very often involved, hence more expense. Quote
rbw1966 Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 Doesn't YOSAR charge for rescues if the parties needing rescued do not have adequate equipment? I seem to recall they are either charged money or for criminal wrecklessness. Quote
jon Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 I think the reason is because law enforcement can be more involved in a search operation in the woods versus a rescue up in the mountains. Quote
mattp Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 I be you are right about that being an important factor, Jon. The searches are typically going to involve more PAID staffing in addition to just larger numbers with larger logistics expenses and the aircraft support for mountain rescue, as we have been discussing, is often not chargeable to the operation. The point is, we should be careful when asserting that "climbers cost less than hikers to rescue" or whatever. To the extent that if you read up on it that appears to be true -- fine. But you'll have to consider things like volunteer labor being actually worth something and military training exercises being significant components as well. In addition, those of us who are members of the American Alpine Club actually DO have rescue insurance and I believe that some folks HAVE been billed for their rescues or at least some portion of the cost. Quote
jon Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 I think when all was said and done I spent somewhere in the neighboorhood of 2000 hours involved with SAR. That doesn't include gas, class expenses, equipment, etc. It came to the point where it was hard to justify the time and expense. I don't think climbers rescues cost any less, but there are sure far far less of them. One search that stands out in my mind was a women who was lost with her baby and two dogs on Tiger, I think maybe during the fall. People were pretty frantic to find her because of the baby and it was getting a little chilly out. I think there were two helicopters in the air with infrared. We found her pretty quickly but the amount of resources used was enormous! Why aren't people writing letters about people like this who are endangering another person (their child) and are ill prepared for such environs? Sorry to say I'm all about survival of the fittest. Quote
mattp Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 Climbing is perceived as a thrill-sport based on unnecessary risk and there is certainly some truth to that perception. We can argue that the risks are not really all that great -- and you might find some insurance company analysis to back that argument up -- but I think the reason climbers are singled out as opposed to boaters or irresponsible mom's has to do with this idea that we are reckless thrill-seekers. We could argue that anybody who goes to a Mariners game and parks under the viaduct is asking to get mugged and they should pay for any police support they receive, or that mom who takes her child outside during marginal weather has similarly courted disaster, but I don't think those arguments are going to go very far. Quote
Stefan Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 When I was rescued in the Enchantments the dudes in the helicopter were stoked becuase they got to do a real life rescue in more precarious terrain than their training ground on the Yakima reservation. They even turned out all their lights (10pm or 11pm was the rescue) on the Blackhawk and used night vision goggles during the whole rescue. Quote
goatboy Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 Possibly a tangent, possibly relevant: National Forests can charge people who accidently start forest fires, and I know negligent people in Nat'l Parks have been charged fees for their rescue -- how does that relate to this topic overall, in your minds? Quote
Stefan Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 Possibly a tangent, possibly relevant: National Forests can charge people who accidently start forest fires, and I know negligent people in Nat'l Parks have been charged fees for their rescue -- how does that relate to this topic overall, in your minds? I had a friend who blew out a knee by the Gardners by Winthrop. He had a helicopter come and pick him up by the SAR folks out there. I think it was a county helicopter--but I could be wrong. My friend said he had to pay $5000 for the helicopter ride. Quote
sobo Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 According to my (past) discussions with the crew chiefs at the Yakima Firing Center, these guys actually prefer to use NOV for low-light operations. They can see better (i.e. a wider field of view) with NOV than with a spotlight, and the current version of NOV has a built-in IR light source that helps them to read maps while in flight without switching in and out of NOV (bummer to continually readjust your night vision) or having to use penlights and such. And it's all "hands free", which is a good option to have while flying a chopper. Granted, the sample size for this survey was rather small... Quote
jon Posted July 12, 2005 Posted July 12, 2005 I had a friend who blew out a knee by the Gardners by Winthrop. He had a helicopter come and pick him up by the SAR folks out there. I think it was a county helicopter--but I could be wrong. My friend said he had to pay $5000 for the helicopter ride. Yeah medical insurance doesn't cover that. Quote
Dru Posted July 13, 2005 Posted July 13, 2005 BTW the PI is reading this Are they going to quote my cyberstalking, bitchslap comments word for word Quote
Cobra_Commander Posted July 13, 2005 Posted July 13, 2005 maybe they are looking for inspiration for another comic strip. Not that I care as I am already featured in one. Quote
Alpinfox Posted July 13, 2005 Posted July 13, 2005 I had a friend who blew out a knee by the Gardners by Winthrop. He had a helicopter come and pick him up by the SAR folks out there. I think it was a county helicopter--but I could be wrong. My friend said he had to pay $5000 for the helicopter ride. Yeah medical insurance doesn't cover that. I just checked my medical insurance benefits and they cover 80% of ambulance expenses (air and ground). They also cover 100% of chemical dependency treatment after the $200 bar tab... er... I mean copay. Quote
sobo Posted July 13, 2005 Posted July 13, 2005 Sent a letter to the editor at the P-I. Don't know whether or not they'll print it; it was over 400 words. Quote
Norman_Clyde Posted July 13, 2005 Author Posted July 13, 2005 Very cool to read all the good stuff posted. Sobo, thanks for putting in the time and effort on behalf of all of us. I have a little info re: Yos rescues. My son was briefly unaccounted for on the Mist trail this past September, due to receiving poor directions from my father (fortunately he found his own way down without difficulty). My dad later told me that contributing to his relief at my son's belated appearance was the knowledge that, if a search did have to be mobilized, there is an automatic $5K charge to the party involved. I never tried to verify this, but he lives in CA and goes to Yos all the time, so it's probably correct. Quote
Mike_Gauthier Posted July 13, 2005 Posted July 13, 2005 If you get flown off a mountain, and dropped at your car, 1) does it count as a summit? Dru, this counts as 6 summits. But if you're careless and forgetful, you can easily turn 6 into 9... Quote
olyclimber Posted July 13, 2005 Posted July 13, 2005 Dru, ignore the dark one. There is no summit—clear your mind of questions. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.