Jump to content

Red Hat Linux


whistlepunk

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

you might have some non-standard hardware of some sort? when i created a dual boot system a couple years ago it was kind of tempramental with certain devices attached to the machine.

 

The beauty of quality open-source operating systems. Non-standard hardware? Clearly the right thing for the software to do is simply not boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you might have some non-standard hardware of some sort? when i created a dual boot system a couple years ago it was kind of tempramental with certain devices attached to the machine.

 

The beauty of quality open-source operating systems. Non-standard hardware? Clearly the right thing for the software to do is simply not boot.

 

At least you can find a patch, expect to see one soon (or write it).

 

As for Microshit software, gotta love the blue screen...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha! I know, I'm just trying to cause a shitstorm.

 

I'm sure Linux is better for plenty, but I loved watching a bunch of friends try to shed MS for linux "on the desktop" and fuck around with it for weeks only to switch back.

 

I love hearing about the blue screen, but I know sooooo many more people that end up having bitch fits about crap with Linux than actually get the blue screen. MS has gotten way better about releasing patches. I've got nothing against Linux, I just use whatever fits my needs better and in my expierence linux on the desktop is pretty much a fantasy at this point.

 

The fact that you mention "writing" patch just further proves my point...Linux is still in the realm of the elite, it isn't worthwhile for the other 99.9% of the computer using population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

At least you can find a patch, expect to see one soon (or write it).

 

As for Microshit software, gotta love the blue screen...

 

yelrotflmao.gif It's like .0000001% of the worlds population that could find and install a patch, nevermind write their own.

 

Microsfot OSs are for folks who don't have the time to dink around and need to get real, revenue generating work done.

 

I haven't had a 'blue screen of death' for a good couple of years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OS X, ya cocksuckers. the_finger.gif

 

How ya like them Apples?

 

wave.gif

i had to use that fuking os in order to play tunes on my latest toy (i.e.: ipod beeyotch). sposed to be unix based but i dont really know wtf the kernal is. i hate the one mouse clicker thingy that mac makes u use. kina tarded. but kina cool too. i just might get me an ibook now. 12 inches and 60 gb of potential porn images. fuk yeah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't had a 'blue screen of death' for a good couple of years now.

 

Thanks. I have not had one either in probably 3 or 4 years, however I saw one last night on a Windows 2000 machine.

 

From what I've seen the code quality has improved vastly over the course of the last several OS releases, using NT4 as a baseline. I still see freaky stuff sometimes on all OS versions, usually when

1) playing DirectX games or

2) using peripherals that have buggy drivers or

3) messing around with not-completely-thought-through C++ code

 

I like Linux though, if you think its for the elite now, you probably didn't try it 5 or 6 years ago. I think companies like RedHat etc have come a long way in making this particular type of OS accessible to normal users.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't had a 'blue screen of death' for a good couple of years now.

 

Thanks. I have not had one either in probably 3 or 4 years, however I saw one last night on a Windows 2000 machine.

 

From what I've seen the code quality has improved vastly over the course of the last several OS releases, using NT4 as a baseline. I still see freaky stuff sometimes on all OS versions, usually when

1) playing DirectX games or

2) using peripherals that have buggy drivers or

3) messing around with not-completely-thought-through C++ code

 

I like Linux though, if you think its for the elite now, you probably didn't try it 5 or 6 years ago. I think companies like RedHat etc have come a long way in making this particular type of OS accessible to normal users.

 

Yeah, I started working with Linux back in school some 10 years ago, still use it at work a bit too. I fully agree that companies like Red Hat have done wonders for making Linux accessible, I think that's great.

 

Just got to pick the right tool for the job (even, uh, Apple, well, sometimes). In my line of work we count on a lot of powerful, high level tools to get a lot of work done in a short period of time and Windows is the answer. As a math/compsci geek I secretly root for open source software, I just realize in using it it'd be hard to do what I want to do and get paid. grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...