allthumbs Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 The proposed Oregon law makes any person participating in any protest about anything that impedes traffic liable for a mandantory Life sentence. They will serve a minimum of 25 years. quote: A person commits the crime of terrorism if the person knowingly plans, participates in or carries out any act that is intended, by at least one of its participants, to disrupt: (a) The free and orderly assembly of the inhabitants of the State of Oregon; ((b) Commerce or the transportation systems of the State of Oregon; or © The educational or governmental institutions of the State of Oregon or its inhabitants. (4)(a) A person convicted of terrorism shall be punished by imprisonment for life. (b) When a person is convicted of terrorism under this section, the court shall order that the person be confined for a minimum of 25 years without possibility of parole. Read it and weap FDA Quote
gapertimmy Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 i think the city of Eugene is going to mutiny over this one and form their own soverign nation Quote
snoboy Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 trask said: true shit, check it out Where? source?? Scary! Quote
erik Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 TRASH WHAT DID YOU HAVE FOR DINNER LAST NIGHT? THERE SEEMS TO BE ALOT OF NOISE COMING OUT OF YOUR ASS? OH WAIT THAT MIGHT BE YOUR HEAD!!! Quote
fern Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 behind the times. I think Canada has had some federal legislation similar since they were planning theat Kananaskis shindig post 9-11. Quote
allthumbs Posted March 28, 2003 Author Posted March 28, 2003 Don't believe me, call your local sheriff or an attorney or whoever and find out. Quote
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 It is true, but it'll never pass. The thing's so vaguely written you could probably go to jail for holding up the checkout line at the grocery store if you were wearing a pro-peace t-shirt. That "Tim Eyman is a jackass" bill up in Washington was a better piece of legislation than this turd. PS - Trask is poo! Quote
JoshK Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 Ahh, yes, 'tis a shame we couldn't get the tim eyman is a jackass bill on the ballot. Quote
Ursa_Eagle Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 Well, you all heard about the guy in Albany, NY who got arrested for wearing a "peace" t-shirt in a mall that he bought in the same mall, right? He was a district attorney too! It made the news back there and the next day, hundreds of people were walking around with "peace" t-shirts. The mall has since dropped all charges, but he was deciding whether or not to sue. I might be able to dig up a link, but it will take me a few minutes. Quote
allthumbs Posted March 28, 2003 Author Posted March 28, 2003 Dr_Flash_Amazing said: It is true, but it'll never pass. The thing's so vaguely written you could probably go to jail for holding up the checkout line at the grocery store if you were wearing a pro-peace t-shirt. That "Tim Eyman is a jackass" bill up in Washington was a better piece of legislation than this turd. PS - Trask is poo! Your anarchist days are numbered asshole. Quote
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 It must suck having to wear that electronic locator anklet all the time, huh, Trask? Does it zap you if you leave the house, or do the cops come by or what? Of course, with all those flyers advising neighbors of your "status", you probably aren't too keen on being seen in public anyway. Quote
Fejas Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 sweet... I never have anything to protest anyway... And I get really pissed off when peaceful protesters turn violent and start burning flags... fucking pricks... Quote
Ursa_Eagle Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 here's the link the story I mentioned earlier: Lawyer Arrested for Wearing a 'Peace' T-Shirt Quote
glen Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 Shit, that is REALLY scary. Remember that we in WA never thought Eyman's bills would pass either and we we are fiscally fucked with capital F. You can read Oregons SB742 in pdf format at: SB 742 in pdf format. Quote
allthumbs Posted March 28, 2003 Author Posted March 28, 2003 "turn out the lightssssss, the party's overrrrr" Real Americans' are tired of anarchists in this country. throw em' all in jail for life. Quote
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 "Here we go, congress one, progress zero You think your leaders are thinking about reform They’d sooner sit and watch our cities burn like Nero Makes you wonder what the FUCK you’re voting for For a change, vote - who the fuck are you kidding, me? What we need is some good old fashioned anarchy You bring the torch and I’ll bring the kerosene We’ll strike a match and burn this fucker down! BURN THIS FUCKER DOWN! BURN THIS FUCKER DOWN! BURN THIS FUCKER DOOOOOWWWWWN! BURN THIS FUCKER DOWN!" Quote
Fejas Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 trask said: "turn out the lightssssss, the party's overrrrr" Real Americans' are tired of anarchists in this country. throw em' all in jail for life. yup......... sweet tag trask, you like David Allen Coe? Quote
glen Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 Real Americans' are tired of anarchists in this country. throw em' all in jail for life. So, what if the NRA had a rally to support gun legislation? By this law, they could just as easily be branded as 'terrorists' and jailed for a minimum of 25 years without possibility of parole. In fact, the increased possibility of the presence of guns at that hypothetical rally could be used to justify more severe repression methods. The labelling of persons practicing civil disobedience as anarchists is just simply wrong. Civil anarchy is an oxymoron. There are already laws about blocking traffic, grafitti, and 'anarchism'. Why give the government extra leverage against its citizenry? I mean, really, why? Quote
Fejas Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 glen said: Real Americans' are tired of anarchists in this country. throw em' all in jail for life. So, what if the NRA had a rally to support gun legislation? By this law, they could just as easily be branded as 'terrorists' and jailed for a minimum of 25 years without possibility of parole. In fact, the increased possibility of the presence of guns at that hypothetical rally could be used to justify more severe repression methods. The labelling of persons practicing civil disobedience as anarchists is just simply wrong. Civil anarchy is an oxymoron. There are already laws about blocking traffic, grafitti, and 'anarchism'. Why give the government extra leverage against its citizenry? I mean, really, why? I belong to the NRA, but I wouldn't go to a rally, and a protest on any of their issues as well as any other issue... its not that i'm happy being a sheep its more along the line of it does not do any good (except a few instances, mind you), and it is a compleat waist of my time... money talks and bullshit walks... if you really what something to change than you get the support of some finacial backers and you take it straight to the source... why bother talkin' to some asshole from a street corner... Quote
erik Posted March 28, 2003 Posted March 28, 2003 what is you are protesting the protester?? ih wait that is just pure physical violence!! viva la policia! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.