jon

Trask's mama is so fat when you get on top of her your ears pop.

Trask's mama is so stupid she had sex with Erik.

Hmmm I guess Trask must be working...... OR JUST BRINGING IT WEAK!! Erik's mama is so ugly her shadow quit. Dru's mama is so stupid/ugly she is Canadian.

Trask's mama is so buckled even a blind man wouldn't have sex with her.

Trask's mama is so fat her belly-button doesn't have lint, it has sweaters.

The appended article from Saturday's Spokesman Review (Spokane Washington) was one of the few Day of Action articles to quote Derrick Crandall, President of the American Recreation Coalition. Crandall's comments are important, and so I encourage everyone to read what he has to say. I'd also like to specifically respond to the following most-important point and invite you to respond to is as well. Quoting from the article: "Crandall said his group proposes giving free permits to anyone who can prove a financial need or is willing to volunteer for trail maintenance work." Recreation fees are discriminatory and exclusionary. These are undisputed facts emphasized by each and every one of the 30 groups of protestors who participated in Saturday's National Day of Action. Crandall and the USFS have, in effect, acknowledged that these fees are discriminatory when they propose creating "second-class citizens passes" and when they suggest that poor people should be allowed to earn passes by working at sub-minimum, virtually-slave, wages. IF there is a proven need for going to a recreation fee system (which there is not!) then the fees should be voluntary such that no one must suffer the stigma of having to prove themselves to be poor. And if volunteer passes are to be earned, then I hope Mr. Crandall will support compensating all volunteers with a "living wage" of at least $15 per hour in exchange for their labor. I find it extraordinary that the USFS and Mr. Crandall believe that the current USFS practice of offering a scant handful of "free days" a year is anything less than grossly elitist -- if not outright racist. I also find the current USFS practice of compensating "volunteers" at less than minimum wages as detestable. Creating user-fees which serve as an artificial barrier to poor persons and then using these fees as a mechanism for recruiting virtual slave-labor from these same excluded-persons, is reprehensible. I advise everyone reading this message to be on the sharp lookout for additional "Volunteer"-related legislation from ARC and the Bush Administration. 'Volunteerism,' as the concept is being abused by these people, is NOT to the supported. And one last point upon which I'd like to draw attention: --- What does Mr. Crandall mean when he says that his coalition is helping the agencies work out the challenges in collecting and distributing money? Who empowered ARC to be engaged in this role ---- and what ever happened to Democracy in this country? "Fee-Demo is Un-Democratic" THAT was the theme for this year's Day of Action. Mr. Crandall, Ms Cleeland and Mr. Bingaman --- on behalf of everyone who protested on Saturday, I challenge you to try and prove us wrong. I challenge you to explain how these "free days" and "volunteer passes" are solutions worthy of a Democratic society. Scott PS... This message has been copied to ARC, to Senator Bingaman and to the head of the USFS Fee-Demonstration program. Please feel free to respond to any or all of them. ----------- begin quoted --------- http://www.spokesmanreview.com/pf.asp?date=061502&ID=s1167700 Saturday, June 15, 2002 U.S. recreation fees could be permanent Dan Hansen - Staff writer Congress is set to decide whether the public should pay extra to enjoy lands where access traditionally has been free. Opponents, who plan low-key protests across the nation today, say they fear recreation fees are a step toward commercializing recreation on federal forests and locking out the poor. The fees were first imposed as a test in 1997; President Bush and some members of Congress propose making them permanent. "We think that taxes should pay for care and maintenance of recreational forest lands," said Randy Barcus, Spokane member of Washington Backcountry Horsemen. "We don't feel that we should have to pay twice." But fee supporters say those who use the most popular trailheads, boat launches and picnic areas should shoulder the burden for maintaining them. "It's very logical to recover more of the expenses from an individual who is enjoying special services than from the taxpaying public at large," said Derrick Crandall, president of the American Recreation Coalition, an industry group. Almost since the beginning of the National Park Service, visitors to places like Yellowstone and Mount Rainier have paid entrance fees. A generation of campers have paid to pitch a tent or park a camper at many Forest Service campgrounds. But only since 1997 have visitors paid to park at the popular trailheads, or use some boat launches, picnic areas and visitor centers on federal land outside national parks. Forests use the money for things like trail maintenance, restroom upkeep and visitor centers. In Washington and Oregon, for instance, visitors must have a $30 Northwest Forest Pass to park at hundreds of trailheads, including four in the Colville National Forest and 25 in the Umatilla National Forest. The annual pass -- or a $5 daily pass -- also is required at some picnic areas and boat launches. Such fees were authorized by Congress when it passed the National Recreation Fee Demonstration Program in 1996. The program allows the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to collect the fees, with 80 percent of the money going back to the forests where it is gathered. Some forests -- those in North Idaho and northwestern Montana among them -- have opted not to impose new fees on visitors. But the program has allowed them to keep the money they already were collecting at campgrounds, cabins and other sites. The same is true at most national parks. The four agencies collected $600million under the program between 1997 and 2001. The Forest Service alone has collected more than $123 million. Congress has extended the temporary program twice, most recently in November. It is now set to expire in 2004. Senate Bill 2607, which Sen. Jeff Bingaman introduced this week, would make the program permanent. Bingaman, D-N.M., chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, which plans a hearing on the matter Wednesday. Opponents expect introduction of a similar House bill this summer. "If the folks who are championing this legislation get their way, this will be made permanent by the end of this year," said Scott Silver, a Bend, Ore., biochemist and outdoorsman who leads national opposition to the fees. Silver said he first became suspicious of the fees when he learned that the American Recreation Coalition supports them. The coalition represents sporting goods retailers, amusement parks, campground chains, snowmobile manufacturers and other segments of the recreation industry. It signed a 1996 agreement to help promote and explain the fees for the Forest Service. That connection, plus various federal documents predicting that traditionally Spartan public campgrounds eventually will have to provide more modern amenities, has fee opponents warning that federal forests eventually could become more like amusement parks than the back woods -- places where major corporations can make a profit. They warn of the "Disneyfication of the wild," noting that Walt Disney Co. is a coalition member. Coalition president Crandall calls such statements "intentionally misleading." In fact, he said, the coalition doesn't support the Bingaman bill. "Does that mean we think the fees should be removed? No," he said. But before the fees are made permanent, the agencies must work out challenges in collecting the money and distributing the money, Crandall said. His coalition is helping with that. "We think the agencies have done a pretty good job," Crandall said. "We'd give them a B-minus." Forest visitors who don't have passes face $50 tickets. Perhaps no one in the nation has been ticketed more often than the Rev. Jeffrey Barker of Seattle. He's never been forced to pay. Barker, a United Church of Christ pastor, spends most Saturday mornings hiking the popular Snow Lake trail at Snoqualmie Pass, partly to settle his mind for the next day's sermon. His routine in recent years has included passing out protest literature to fellow hikers. Barker said that he returns all of his tickets to the Forest Service, with a note saying the fees violate his First Amendment rights of worship. "I really believe that we citizens have a right to commune with God in the forest without paying another fee," Barker said. Barker will protest today in Seattle, as part of a "National Day of Action" called by fee opponents. About 30 such events are scheduled nationwide, according to Silver. In Spokane, activists will spend the morning urging Riverfront Park visitors to oppose the fees, said Paul Schenkenberger, event organizer. Opponents in Moscow, Idaho, will ask people at the farmers market to sign a letter to Congress, said Larry McLaud of the environmental group Friends of the Clearwater. Among the Northwest's congressional delegation, Rep. Peter DeFazio has been the most outspoken opponent of the fees. The Oregon Democrat co-sponsored a bill last year to end the fees. Rep. George Nethercutt "is generally supportive" of the fees, said April Gentry, a spokeswoman for the Spokane Republican. Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., is a member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, which will host next week's hearing. She hasn't taken a stand, but is concerned about burdening the poor with another fee, said her spokeswoman, Jennifer Crider. Forest Service officials note that the agency waives the fee for several days each summer -- including this Sunday, in honor of Father's Day. And Crandall said his group proposes giving free permits to anyone who can prove a financial need or is willing to volunteer for trail maintenance work. "We believe that this nation needs more people with an intimate connection to the great outdoors than ever before," he said. .Dan Hansen can be reached at (509) 459-3938 or by e-mail at danh@spokesman.com ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Scott Silver Wild Wilderness 248 NW Wilmington Ave. Bend, OR 97701 phone: 541-385-5261 e-mail: ssilver@wildwilderness.org Internet: http://www.wildwilderness.org ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pasted below is the Native Forest Council's news release for the National Day of Action to End Forest Fees. It, like so many of the news releases activists have been writing, does a fantastic job of explaining why we will be protesting on Saturday. I'd like to offer thanks to Tim Hermach and indeed to everyone for their fantastic efforts in spreading the word and making this Day of Action a reality. Based upon the enormous number of media calls I've received and from the feedback I am receiving from activists all across the country, I can promise you that this Day of Action is going to send a message that is so loud and is so clear that EVEN Congress will hear it. That message will say that We The People of this country oppose Forest Fees and oppose the privatization and commercialization of recreational opportunities on our public lands. Thanks to everyone. Have a great day of action! Scott -------- begin quoted ------- http://www.forestcouncil.org/act/feedemopr.php#text FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Tim Hermach ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: www.forestcouncil.org Protests Against Fee Demo Scheduled Across the Nation "Just say no to forest fees." That's the message citizens across the U.S. will be sending to the Forest Service on June 15. Opponents of Recreation Fee Demonstration, or "Fee Demo," have organized 26 protests in nine different states, including a mock coffin-nailing in New Hampshire, simulated "sidewalk demonstration fees" in San Francisco and a toilet paper drive in Arizona (to offset one expense supposedly covered by fees). The National Day of Action will coincide with Great Outdoor Week, an event organized by the industry group behind the government program that charges citizens additional fees for visiting public lands. "This is Enron accounting and double taxation," says Tim Hermach, president of Native Forest Council, one group fighting Fee Demo. "Our taxes already pay for so-called public lands management. All they're managing to do is help industry trash precious national assets at a net loss. Subsidies for national forest logging topped a billion dollars last year. Why should we have to pay to camp, hike or fish on lands that our forefathers set aside for the American people?" The brainchild of the American Recreation Coalition (ARC), an industry lobbying group, Fee Demo started in 1996, with a rider tacked on to an appropriations bill. Fee Demo was introduced as a three-year experiment, but has been extended through 2004 by two additional riders. The latest extension is scheduled to expire at the end of the 2004 fiscal year. Today, fees are charged at 365 sites on national parks, forests and BLM lands, generating an estimated $2-3 million annually. Visitors who refuse to pay can be fined up to $100. As Americans discover their public lands aren't as public as they used to be, opposition is growing-and creating some unlikely bedfellows. At least 175 organizations have come out against Fee Demo and, as fees are enforced more rigorously, hunters and fishermen are joining hikers and conservationists to oppose forest fees. Bipartisan federal legislation to terminate the plan was introduced in 1999, but failed. At least four state governments have passed legislation to formally oppose Fee Demo. Lawmakers in Washington are planning to take the "demo" out of Fee Demo, making the program permanent. That makes this summer a crucial time for opponents to make their voices heard and publicize the problems with the fee program. According to environmentalists, federal agencies already receive taxpayer dollars to manage public lands, but use most of it instead to subsidize mining, logging, grazing and drilling. Fees also make public lands off limits to low-income families and promote destructive activities, such as off-road vehicle use. Most importantly, say opponents, Fee Demo represents a sea change in the federal agencies entrusted with public lands. "It's the Disneyfication of our natural treasures," says Hermach. "These agencies want new sources of revenue, and the fee program is just the ticket. This time, they're in bed with wreckreaction (sic) corporations, instead of big timber. New industry. Same destruction. Same perverse incentives. Same liquidation of our national heritage at a net loss to the American taxpayer. Stop subsidizing the industries that trash public lands, and you'll save billions - that's a lot of picnic tables and toilet paper. A mere fraction of the tax dollars they'd save would cover any fee revenue. And it would save what's left of our mountains, forests, rivers and streams." -END- Tim Hermach Executive Director Native Forest Council PO Box 2190 Eugene, OR 97402 541.688.2600 fax 305.768.0115 or 541.461.2156 web page: http://www.forestcouncil.org ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Scott Silver Wild Wilderness 248 NW Wilmington Ave. Bend, OR 97701 phone: 541-385-5261 e-mail: ssilver@wildwilderness.org Internet: http://www.wildwilderness.org June 15, 2002 is National Day of Action to PROTEST FOREST FEES. For additional information contact us or see: http://www.wildwilderness.org/docs/2002doa.htm ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The second, of several recreation-fee and recreation-infrastructure pieces of legislation was introduced in the Senate on Tuesday of this week. The bill can be read at: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:S2607: It should some as NO SURPRISE that this legislation was introduced during the American Recreation Coalition's "Great Outdoors Week" (www.funoutdoors.com). I only wish I or some member of the general public could have been inside the meetings ARC must have had with the sponsor of this legislation, Senator Bingaman (D-NM). This bill appears to be on an extreme fast tract. A Senate hearing has already been set for next week, (June 19, 2002 at 9:30 AM) http://energy.senate.gov/cfdocs/e_witnesslist.cfm?id=288 Needless to say ... this is "crunch time" for everyone who has been working so hard to end forest fees!! With the national Day of Action to end forest fees coming up on Saturday, I wish to say "Good Luck" and offer a sincere "THANK YOU" to everyone who will be participating. Thirty Demonstrations are scheduled in nine States, thanks to the help and efforts of so many of you copied on this message. When we all shout in unison on Saturday it will be our voice that is heard above the voice of the recreation special-interests for whom the Recreation Fee Demonstration Program has been created. Day of Action details can be viewed at: http://www.wildwilderness.org/docs/2002doa.htm Scott PS... The first bill in the current series of recreation-fee-related bills applies only to the National Parks. That bill can be read at: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:S2473 and it was introduced by Senator Craig Thomas (R-WY). ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Scott Silver Wild Wilderness 248 NW Wilmington Ave. Bend, OR 97701 phone: 541-385-5261 e-mail: ssilver@wildwilderness.org Internet: http://www.wildwilderness.org June 15, 2002 is National Day of Action to PROTEST FOREST FEES. For additional information contact us or see: http://www.wildwilderness.org/docs/2002doa.htm ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The following article from the current edition of High Country News lays out the legislative situation of the Recreation Fee Demonstration quite well. Basically we have the USFS desperate to make fees permanent--- hoping that so doing will magically blunt the growing opposition to this controversial program. We have the special-interest proponents of fee-demo desperately trying to use their two favorite champions Reps. Jim Hansen and Joe Skeen one more time before these villains retire (remember, fee-demo is Hansen's baby). And finally we have a variety of folks all saying that in the six years since fee-demo was first authorized, the USFS still hasn't a clue how to make this program work. MOST IMPORTANTLY, we have a clear challenge. If we do not want recreation user fees to become the permanent law of the land, it is up to us to ensure that it does not become the permanent law of the land. No one is going to stop this legislation for us!!! Please join us on June 15th to protest fee-demo and to urge Congress to restore adequate funding to maintain appropriate levels of recreational infrastructure on, and provide adequate protection of, America's public lands. Details for 30 scheduled protests can be found on the web at: www.wildwilderness.org/docs/2002doa.htm Scott -------- begin quoted -------- http://www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=11275 WESTERN ROUNDUP, June 10, 2002 Permanent user fees in the pipeline by Hal Clifford Agencies struggle toward a unified public-lands pass After a clamorous seven-year test, the Bush administration wants to expand and make permanent the federal government's program of charging user fees for recreation on public lands. Prodded by Congress, officials at the U.S. Forest Service, National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service are scrambling to draft legislation for a single, nationwide recreation pass for all U.S. public lands. The new system would replace the Recreation Fee Demonstration, or "fee demo," program first created by Congress in 1996 and extended twice by rider, now until 2004 (HCN, 2/14/00: Land of the fee). "The Forest Service feels that we have tested enough," says Teri Cleeland, Forest Service national fee program leader in Washington, D.C. "We've learned a lot, and it's time for the American people to learn what a permanent program would look like." But even as the agencies move rapidly toward a unified pass proposal, officials admit they're far from a workable plan. That gives opponents, both in and out of Congress, some hope that they can stymie the effort, despite its momentum. "If the Forest Service is going to make (fees) work," says Bob Dale of Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics, "they're going to have to do it with a lot more thought and care than what's gone into the fee demo program." Circling the wagons Between 1997 and 2001, the agencies collected $600 million in fees. Last year, fee demo grossed $126.2 million for the Park Service; $35.3 million for the Forest Service; $7.6 million for the BLM; and $3.7 million for the Fish and Wildlife Service. The agencies are required to spend 80 percent of fee revenues, minus administrative costs, at the place where they were collected, rather than send the money to Washington. Opponents of fee demo long have argued that the program is a form of double taxation, since federal tax dollars already support management of the public lands. Supporters point to a maintenance backlog of $4.9 billion at the Park Service and $800 million at the Forest Service, and the absence of sufficient congressional funding as a reason the public should pay to play. That line of reasoning resonates with the Bush administration, which this spring created the Recreation Fee Leadership Council to draft legislation that would make the user-fee program permanent. The council, made up of 16 top-level federal officials representing the four lands agencies and the Bureau of Reclamation, is co-chaired by Mark Rey, undersecretary of the Department of Agriculture, and Lynn Scarlett, assistant secretary of the Department of Interior. No firm decisions have been made, but the council is working from a draft "blueprint" produced in April by Forest Service Deputy Chief Tom L. Thompson. The blueprint says the government would not charge for "general access" to national forests; driving or walking through; parking at scenic overlooks and pullouts; and dispersed camping or other low-impact recreation. The agencies would, however, charge for parking at trailheads; entrance to visitors' centers; use of trailhead, boating and swimming facilities; national recreation areas; national monuments; and visits to "concentrated-use areas" where heavy traffic takes a toll on the environment. The pass program under consideration includes annual national, regional, statewide and single-forest passes, along with single-use fees. Officials working on the new program say they don't know yet how much the passes will cost. Golden Eagle passes currently cost $65. "What we would really like to do nationally is have a national parks and public lands pass," says Lee Larson, senior outdoor recreation specialist for permits and fees at the national BLM office, "not just the Forest Service and Park Service, but for everyone (together)." But, adds Larson, "It's not a public lands pass in the sense of getting on public lands. It's only for areas where there's services." Even if they buy the new passes, visitors may pay extra charges - as they do now - to use developed camp sites and boat launches. Last November, the General Accounting Office criticized federal agencies for their "overlapping and inconsistent" implementation of user fees; observed that managers had not been given clear direction on what they were supposed to accomplish with the fee demo program; and concluded that despite years of testing, the agencies still have not proven "what types of fees and fee collection practices work best." It's also far from clear how much money the proposed permanent fee program might generate, or how that money would be split up. Cleeland says the Forest Service has hired the accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers to make that calculation but has been unable to come up with a number because "the questions we ask of our data are not the same questions that Pricewaterhouse would have asked." Revenue for passes that are valid at more than one locale would be divided up using a formula based both on creating incentives to sell passes, and getting the money to roughly correspond with the level of use. That formula, however, has yet to be devised. "One pass with one simple fee would be a lot better, but that's not what we're getting," says Jason Robertson, access director for American Whitewater. "What we're getting is one fee for parking and access, but then they're talking about this raft of whole other fees for such activities as camping and boating. "The whole purpose of the fee program is being lost in this discussion. We're moving from fees for mitigation toward fees for fees' sake, fees for revenue collection." Race against the clock Concerns like Robertson's have moderated somewhat the stance of longtime user fee champion Rep. Scott McInnis, a Colorado Republican who chairs the House Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health. In a Jan. 25 letter to Forest Service Chief Dale Bosworth, McInnis reiterated his support for fees, but cautioned that money needs to be spent on the ground and the program subject to reauthorization by Congress every five years. Nonetheless, McInnis is still clearly among user fees' staunchest advocates. Speaking in Montrose, Colo., on May 4, McInnis said that fee demo may come to an end, but added, "We need to tax those users. We need those fees." Josh Penry, staff director of the McInnis-led forests subcommittee, says legislation to create a national fee program is likely to be introduced this year. Sen. Craig Thomas, R-Wyo., has already introduced legislation to make the fee program permanent for the National Park Service and to permit that agency to share revenues with state - although not federal - agencies on a reciprocal basis if they honor each other's passes. The administration is racing to take advantage of the support of House Resources Committee Jim Hansen, R-Utah, and House Appropriations Committee chair Joe Skeen, R-N.M., both of whom are retiring this fall. But whether permanent fee legislation will move through Congress in this session is questionable, given that the House will recess in fewer than three months, and representatives are increasingly focused on the fall campaign. Meanwhile, fee opponents are making their voices heard. On May 8, the Colorado State Legislature passed a resolution asking Congress to fully fund the federal lands agencies rather than charge for recreation. The Oregon, California and New Hampshire Legislatures have passed similar resolutions. Colorado Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell, R, pushed by anti-fee Off-Road Vehicle organizations, has also announced his opposition to fees. For its part, the Forest Service plans to start revising its fee program this summer to create more consistency between forests and to identify all sites where fees can and should be charged, says Cleeland. But, she adds, "The devil is in the details." Hal Clifford contributes regularly to High Country News and Writers on the Range from Telluride, Colorado. YOU CAN CONTACT ... Jason Robertson, American Whitewater, 301/589-9453; Teri Cleeland, U.S. Forest Service, 202/205-1169, www.fs.fed.us/recreation/fee_demo/fee_intro.shtml; Lee Larson, BLM, 202/452-5168; Rep. Scott McInnis, R-Colo., 202/225-4761. Copyright © 2002 HCN and Hal Clifford ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Scott Silver Wild Wilderness 248 NW Wilmington Ave. Bend, OR 97701 phone: 541-385-5261 e-mail: ssilver@wildwilderness.org Internet: http://www.wildwilderness.org ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for research and educational purposes.

While some within the environmental community weakly cling to their hope that Fran Mainella was a good choice for the Director of the National Park Service position, most now accept that Mainella is faithfully doing the President's and Gale Norton's bidding --- that of commercializing, privatizing and motorizing America's National Parks. Certainly no one understands that better than the American Recreation Coalition who, on June 11th, will honor Mainella by bestowing upon her their Sheldon Coleman Great Outdoors Award. Previous recipients of this coveted award include such Great Outdoors champions as Senator Frank Murkowski and George Bush, the elder. Pasted below is an announcement from the American Recreation Coalition. It explains why Ms. Mainella is THEIR CHOICE (-- or should I say; "IS THEIR ACE IN THE HOLE!" ?). Please pay special attention to the quote from ARC's President, Derrick Crandall, when he says: "She increased public-private partnerships in the park system, increased volunteerism, and began new funding concepts including Partnership in Parks." (Note, the following bulleted-points are 'officially' recognized as privatization tools) * Public Private Partnerships * Volunteerism * User Fees (For a detailed explanation of how these specific tools are employed see "Types and Techniques of Privatization" http://www.privatization.org --- and please understand, ARC-driven legislation will be introduced in the next few weeks to promote these specific privatization tools!!! So when a wise-use organization that represents the interests of commercial, motorized, recreation and industrial tourism honors Ms. Mainella, perhaps it's time for folks in the environmental community who think Mainella is THEIR CHOICE to think again. If anyone believes Mainella will stand up to ARC or oppose them over the Yellowstone snowmobile access issue, for example, -- think again. The snowmobilers' battle is being led by Ed Kim, President of the International Snowmobile Manufacturers Association, and by former ISMA President, Catherine Ahern. Klim is an ARC Board member, Ahern is ARC's Vice President and Mainella is about to accept THEIR Great Outdoors Award. In a world of "Pay-to-Play", ARC knows that it pays to pay handsomely so that THEY can play (and profit) without restrictions!!! June 10-14 is ARC's Great Outdoors Week. June 15th is the National Day of Action to End Forest Fees (and to attempt to halt The Corporate Takeover of Nature and the Disneyfication of the Wild). I hope everyone and every organization within the environmental community will be joining us in denouncing the ARC and in asking Congress NOT to make the ARC's fee-demo program the permanent law of the land. Scott PS: Now is the time to get those Letters to the Editor and Op-Eds written. ----------- begin quoted ---------------- http://www.funoutdoors.com/news/news6_02.html PARKS DIRECTOR FRAN MAINELLA TO RECEIVE GREAT OUTDOORS AWARD Washington, D.C., May 17, 2002 - Fran P. Mainella, Director of the National Park Service, will receive the 14th Sheldon Coleman Great Outdoors Award at a June 11 ceremony in Washington before an audience of hundreds of national recreation community leaders. The presentation is a highlight of Great Outdoors Week 2002 (June 10-14), an annual event coordinated by the American Recreation Coalition (ARC). The Sheldon Coleman Great Outdoors Award - named for the late conservationist and leader of The Coleman Company, a top manufacturer of outdoor recreation products - honors an outstanding American leader whose personal efforts have enhanced our nation's outdoor resources and the ability of Americans to enjoy this recreational legacy. The award itself is comprised of a specially-mounted Steuben Water Bird sculpture. Past winners include former President George Bush, National Geographic Society Chairman Gil Grosvenor, U.S. Senators John Breaux (D-LA), Frank Murkowski (R-AK) and the late John Chafee (R-RI), U.S. Representatives Jim Oberstar (D-MN) and Ralph Regula (R-OH) and former Transportation Secretary Rodney Slater. "We are delighted to recognize Fran Mainella with this award, acknowledging and honoring the contributions she has made to recreation in America," said ARC President Derrick Crandall. "Fran has been a leader in the recreation community for three decades, working at the local, state and national levels. She is the 16th Director and the first woman to lead an agency which protects some of America's favorite sites and hosts nearly 300 million visits annually. Prior to her July 2001 appointment to this post, she served as Director of the Division of Recreation and Parks for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, where she was responsible for 153 state parks, museums, preserves, recreation areas, historic sites, geological sites, botanical gardens, archeological sites, wildlife parks, and trails. She increased public-private partnerships in the park system, increased volunteerism, and began new funding concepts including Partnership in Parks. During her tenure, the Florida park agency was awarded the prestigious State Parks Gold Medal, recognizing it as the best state park system in all 50 states," Crandall said. Fran Mainella played an important national leadership role following the September 11 attacks. She was a prime architect of the invitation to Americans to enjoy fee-free visits to parks and other special places during a weekend in November 2001, a weekend offering hope, healing and unity to the nation. In addition, she is leading efforts to erase a large backlog in maintenance needs in our parks and to refocus the National Park Service for its second century. One of her priorities is closer coordination with state, local and private park and recreation efforts, making use of the revitalized Land and Water Conservation Fund. Director Mainella has played a central role in many recreation organizations during her career including services as President of the National Association of State Park Directors, President of the National Recreation and Park Association, and Secretary of Florida A & M University's Landscape Design Advisory Council. She was a member of the Florida Tourism Commission, the statewide Eco-Tourism/Heritage Tourism Committee, and the National Association of State Recreation Liaison Officers. Ms. Mainella has received numerous prestigious awards: the 2000 Harold D. Meyer Professional Award, the highest award given by the National Recreation and Park Association Southern Regional Council, and the 1999 Distinguished Service Award from the National Association of State Park Directors; the 1998 Pugsley Medal, the highest professional honor given by the American Academy of Park and Recreation Administration; and the 1998 William Penn Mott, Jr. Award for Excellence presented by the National Society for Park Resources. Great Outdoors Week is an annual event made possible by the support of more than 30 recreation companies and associations. The event builds national awareness and appreciation of the importance of recreation as a social and economic force in the U.S. Great Outdoors Week 2002 events range from the designation of new national scenic byways by Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta, a Centennial Celebration of the Legacy of Teddy Roosevelt, a Capitol Hill awards presentation for outstanding recreational trails projects, a showcase of outdoor recreation initiatives and a day of fun and adventure on and along the Anacostia River for more than 100 DC youths through WOW-Wonderful Outdoor World. In addition, the U.S. House of Representatives is expected to hold a hearing on enhancing visitor services on the public lands and the head of the USA Freedom Corps, the new volunteerism initiative of President Bush, will celebrate a long and expanding tradition of volunteerism on public lands. The Great Outdoors Award presentation will take place within Arlington National Cemetery at the Women in Military Service for America Memorial. -30- #6-02 (May 17, 2002) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Scott Silver Wild Wilderness 248 NW Wilmington Ave. Bend, OR 97701 phone: 541-385-5261 e-mail: ssilver@wildwilderness.org Internet: http://www.wildwilderness.org June 15, 2002 is National Day of Action to PROTEST FOREST FEES. For additional information or to share your plans, please contact us. Day of Action weblink: http://www.wildwilderness.org/docs/2002doa.htm ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The June 15th National Day of Action to End Forest Fees just received another, most welcome and much appreciated, endorsement. This one comes from Richard Behan, author of "Plundered Promise: Capitalism, Politics, and the Fate of Federal Lands", a book I highly recommend. The short piece by Behan which follows, offers an insightful analysis of how recreation user fees have become one of the greatest threats to public lands. It then puts the Fee-Demo issue into it's rightful context within the bigger picture. If there is anyone out there who still believes Fee-Demo is about paying $5 to keep forest outhouses smelling sweetly, please read on. And for those of you who already know that fee-demo is about nothing less than the Corporate Takeover of Nature and the Disneyfication of the Wild, you will most certainly appreciate reading that which follows... Scott ------ begin------- Fee-Demo and the Economic Taliban by Richard W. Behan Richard W. Behan is the author of Plundered Promise: Capitalism, Politics, and the Fate of the Federal Lands, published by Island Press, 2001. ISBN 1-55963-848-6. For information about the book, go to www.rockisland.com/~rwbehan/ Fee-Demo is the greatest threat to the federal lands since the breathtaking proposals in the Reagan years to sell off the entire public estate, and there is a direct connection between the two. The architects and many of the current advocates of Fee-Demo are the same people who wanted to privatize the federal lands back then. Fee-Demo is simply the latest (and clever, as we will see) incarnation of the urge to bring an end to public land ownership. The champions of Fee-Demo are part of what might be called an Economic Taliban, a fanatic sect of unbending believers in the superiority of "free markets" to conduct and harmonize the affairs of society. Fee-Demo is best seen as part of a great religious pilgrimage to a time and place where the Holy Market triumphs over Tyrannical Government. Known a bit more formally as "neoliberalism," the rhetoric includes death to the infidel. A spokesman for the Bush White House said, "We want to cut government down until it fits in a bath tub. Then we'll drown it." The Economic Taliban was willed into being, and its own Jihad has come close to success. But I believe we will see, in the fairly near future, the Enron Corporation doing them in. In the 1960's 12 arch-conservative philanthropic foundations undertook a deliberate, thoughtful, well-orchestrated and richly financed campaign to shift public policy sharply to the right. They did so by funding the research, writing, and publicity of "market solutions." They achieved what one political scientist described as a "hegemony of market theology," and in two decades they witnessed an international political spectacle: Michael Mulroney in Canada, Margaret Thatcher in the U.K., and Ronald Reagan in the White House espousing that theology simultaneously. The Economic Taliban was now empowered, and decades of progressive public policy were confronted, jeopardized, attacked, and destroyed. Fee-Demo is a piece of this. One of the initiating foundations, the John M. Olin Foundation, has sent a great deal of money to Bozeman, Montana. There, the Political Economy Research Center ("PERC") and the Foundation for Research in Economics and the Environment ("FREE," a far catchier acronym) have been in the vortex of the federal lands privatization movement. The ideological base for Fee-Demo was developed and campaigned from these sources. One of the associates at PERC, Richard Stroup, was the Director of the Office of Policy Analysis for James Watt's Department of the Interior, in the heyday of privatization proposals. P. Lynn Scarlett, who serves now as Gale Norton's Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management, and Budget, has been a senior fellow at FREE. And Terry Anderson, the executive director of PERC, advises the Bush Administration on the "charter forest" issue. PERC and FREE are nothing if not well connected. They can't be faulted for lack of candor. Anderson co-authored in 1999 a paper entitled "How and Why to Privatize Federal Lands," published by the Cato Institute. Because the federal lands agencies-the Park Service, Forest Service, and the Bureau of Land Management-generate less in receipts than they receive in appropriations, they lose money. Therefore the lands should be privatized, to let the markets correct this deficiency. The childlike simplicity of the argument calls more for patience and pity than outrage, but the strategic objective is clear: do away with public land ownership. Donald Leal of PERC is perhaps more patient. He also believes national parks should be put into market settings to make money, but suggests reducing appropriations for the parks gradually, over a ten year period, "until they reach zero." His ideal is a park dedicated totally and explicitly to commerce. The Foundation for Research in Economics and the Environment applies its Olin Foundation money to different purposes. Not policy advocacy, but the dissemination of free market ideology is what FREE does best. It seeks new recruits to the Economic Taliban, but only influential ones, those with leverage. FREE finds many willing and happy volunteers among federal judges. Offering week-long seminars on such topics as "Environmental Economics and Policy Analysis," FREE spreads the neoliberal gospel. The seminars are held at lush resorts near Bozeman, and among the lecturers are Randal O'Toole, the ideological father of Fee-Demo, and P. Lynn Scarlett. The afternoons are open for golf or fishing, until cocktail hour, dinner, and a final dose of market theology from a hand-picked speaker. FREE pays all the expenses for the judges and their wives, and the Olin Foundation pays FREE. The Economic Taliban relies on an obsolete, trite, simplistic dichotomy between market solutions and government, or "command and control" solutions. People can be "free" only in markets; they are tyrannized by governments, they argue. That was true, perhaps, at the time of the American Revolution, but much has happened since, notably the rise to economic and political dominance of the modern corporation. Nowhere does corporate power enter the calculus of the market theology, however. Corporate dominance was starkly evident in the Reagan years. The federal lands were stripped of immense public wealth in the form of timber, oil and gas, forage, and water resources by large national or transnational resource-extracting corporations, and almost without exception their plunder was subsidized with public funds. The rampage was in-your-face noisy and visible, and it provoked a rapid expansion in the number and strength of opposing environmental organizations. The Sierra Club never had a better recruiter than James Watt, but the federal lands suffered grave physical damage. The American people at large were left to witness the ecologic and economic ruin of their lands, and left to bear the associated direct and social costs, as well. The federal lands became and remain a net public liability. Largely gone are the commodity-value resources-the timber, forage, water, minerals, oil and gas stripped in the Reagan onslaught. But one resource is left: the recreational and amenity values of the federal lands. And now corporate interests, again national and transnational, and fronted by the American Recreation Coalition, have their eyes on those. Fee-Demo serves them up for the same fate: corporate pillage. The strategy of the Economic Taliban remains unchanged. Public ownership must end, to defer to the pure and soaring majesty of the market. But the tactics have changed since the Reagan years. If overt and boisterous privatization provokes political opposition, try subtlety instead. Cite the chronic under funding of federal recreation programs (all the while cutting taxes to guarantee it). Cite the advantages of public/private cooperation and "partnerships." And then design Fee-Demo to resolve the problem and exploit the opportunity. Then, over a period of 10 years, wind the public funding down to zero and there you have it. The tub-sized government drowns, and the market can reign unchallenged. Clever, very clever. It won't succeed. The ideology of the Economic Taliban-deregulation, privatization, and the glory of free markets-is both naïve and fraudulent. I have written a book making just this case, and it is only one book among many others. The literature critical of the "hegemony of market theology," however, has not been featured on the evening newscasts. But the collapse of the Enron Corporation has, and so have the cascading linkages of corporate greed, corruption, dishonesty, and purchasing of political influence. The disastrous realities of "market solutions" are front page news. When all the Congressional hearings are concluded and the reports filed, when the lawsuits are settled, when the exposé's have been written and the movies produced about the details and dimensions of this economic, political, and social disaster, then we will see two things. We will see how the modern corporation, immortal in time and unlimited in size, has made "free markets" an oxymoron and "democratic politics" a tragic illusion. And we will see how urgently we need to reclaim and rebuild a healthy, vigorous, truly democratic public life. Suppose we could persuade our Congress to let Fee-Demo expire, quietly and humanely. That would be an exemplary beginning. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Scott Silver Wild Wilderness 248 NW Wilmington Ave. Bend, OR 97701 phone: 541-385-5261 e-mail: ssilver@wildwilderness.org Internet: http://www.wildwilderness.org June 15, 2002 is National Day of Action to PROTEST FOREST FEES. For additional information or to share your plans, please contact us. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

To our friends: The National Day of Action is just 10 days away. Please keep those letters to the editor coming and please be sure the let Congress know what you think of fee-demo on the 15th! Thanks much for all your help. Scott For complete information please go to: http://www.wildwilderness.org/docs/2002doa.htm ------ begin News Release--------- Wild Wilderness 248 NW Wilmington Avenue, Bend, OR 97701 Internet: www.wildwilderness.org FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 5, 2002 Scott Silver, Wild Wilderness 541-385-5261 GREAT OUTDOORS SHOWDOWN COMING AS FOREST FEE ISSUE HEATS UP (Bend, Oregon) -- Opposing sides in the hotly contested issue of how to fund and manage outdoor recreation prepare for ideological clashes during this year's Great Outdoor Week, June 10-15th. Representing the interests of commercial recreation will be the Washington, DC-based lobbyist group American Recreation Coalition (ARC). ARC has scheduled meetings and award ceremonies with top elected and administrative officials. They seek expanded opportunities for ARC's members to control, and to eventually profit from, the commercialization of outdoor recreation on the public lands. Representing the 100-year tradition of free access to America's public lands will be dozens of citizens groups who are staging protests and rallies in locations from coast to coast. Organizers of the event have called June 15th "A National Day of Action to protest Fee-Demo and to urge Congress to restore funding necessary to maintain appropriate levels of recreational infrastructure on, and adequate protection of, America's public lands." Protesters fear that the growing dependence upon user fees and public-private partnerships will lead to increased commercialization, privatization and development of National Forests, parks and public open spaces. Protesters say, "Recreation user fees are Un-Democratic, Exclusionary, Discriminatory and just plain Un-American." Protesters say, "user fees will lead to the Corporate Takeover of Nature and the Disneyfication of the Wild." Congress enacted Fee-Demo in 1996 at the specific behest of ARC, an organization which represents highly mechanized, highly developed, commercial forms of recreation. Fee-Demo is opposed by California, Oregon, New Hampshire, Colorado and over 240 organizations, nationwide. One of the main Day of Action organizers is Scott Silver, Executive Director of Wild Wilderness, a Bend, Oregon-based recreation and conservation organization. Silver along with activists in California, New Hampshire, Colorado, Washington, Arizona and elsewhere are hoping that by combining forces, citizens can have as much influence upon the democratic process as have the special-interest lobbyists in DC. The US Forest Service recently identified states where protests will happen as 'hotspots.' They stated in an internal memo - " FS priority should be to put out 'hotspots.'" According to Silver, "Fee-Demo is fundamentally and irreconcilably flawed. Recreation user fees have not been well accepted by the American public and no amount of fine-tuning can make these fees acceptable. People have the right to walk on public lands and corporate special interests have no right to take that away," Silver said. Protesters are especially concerned that President Bush has asked Congress to grant permanent recreation fee authority in the current legislative session and they anticipate legislation will be introduced during Great Outdoors Week or shortly thereafter. -- end -- ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: National Day of Action information is available at: http://www.wildwilderness.org/docs/2002doa.htm Great Outdoors Week information is available at: http://www.funoutdoors.com/gowsched2002.html Fee-Demo Opposition list is available at: http://www.freeourforests.org/opposition.html US Forest Service 'Hotspot' memo is available at: http://www.sespewild.org/usfsmemo.html ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Scott Silver Wild Wilderness 248 NW Wilmington Ave. Bend, OR 97701 phone: 541-385-5261 e-mail: ssilver@wildwilderness.org Internet: http://www.wildwilderness.org ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Trask's mama is so friggin kicked when she walks into the bank they turn off the surveillance cameras. Cum guzzling gutter slut

The gap between Trask's mamas teeth is so wide, when she smilied at me I didn't know whether to smile back or kick a field goal. Skank

If you're curious as to what sexual positions creates the ugliests kids, just go ask Trask's mama. Beyotch

Trask's mama is so stupid if she spoke her mind she'd be speechless.

I've never seen it that exposed, what year did you take that Ray? Last time I climbed Adams (2 years ago?) there was this dude who was spending a month on the summit. Anybody else run into this guy?

No I'm pretty sure that was dru you saw, but your wife wankin him off. Don't let the fact that this is an "easy" route give you the impression that it doesn't require much of skillset to climb. In "perfect" conditions it's not a problem if you can handle the long slog, I've seen people going up in Tevas with only a bottle of water. That's fine hurray for them. I've also been there when there was a white out on the summit, with a guy in different group become so disoriented that he went down the wrong side without taking his pack. Luckily he found the PCT and found his way down and made it back safetly to Cold Springs. When you are coming down there are typically a few prominant glissading trails coming down from the false summit to the lunch counter. Make sure you have an axe and know how to use it. You can get going pretty fast on those things and there can be rocks and such in the middle of those trails.

Shit happens man glad your OK.

Buy one now and get two free beutiful diamond studded earrings and 24 dinners to Cacina Canina complements of cc.com!

quote: Originally posted by mattp: Allison, you must have a way with the cops. I too have been drinking there for ten years or so, and my experiences at this time of the year have not all been positive. Harassment at Leavenworth by Larry the Tool, Police all up on him at Golden Gardens. WTF you say? Well if you haven't met mattp he's all about the thug life if you know what I'm saying. Tattoos all up and down his arms, a big "mattp" on his chest. Pant's hangin at his waist. More gold hanging on his neck than Mr. T. Daytons and the 16 switches on his ride. Breakin hos like tennis rackets. You listen to me this is one playa you don't want to mess with, so next time your at the crag and mattp steps up wanting to climb the route your on, you best back the fuck off it son or mattp may regulate on yo ass. 4 realz!

quote: Originally posted by Chaseabbott: I agree with Tim. Jon... seriously.... go drink one of your cultures. Tool. I have issues with shoulder straps. What is happening is that the grime (sweat/jon's stupidity) is rubbing into the pore's that happen to be wide open due to the heat. As long as you make sure that you wash right after climbing (don't let the sweat dry) you should be good. Use something like Neutrogena's anti-acne body wash with an exfoliating puff or loofa to get rid of any dirt already trapped. Also you may want to use an alcohol pad to dry out any beginning breakouts (the body wash does this too). Can you tell I've had this problem before? Jon's ass used to be super-zitty until Tim started scrubbing it with loofa. Hot tub time was never the same.... Hey I'm a tool!!!!! Yeah whatever man you keep using your organic hippy tree hugger chick shit, I'll stick with the Pert Plus and Crest. Maybe you wouldn't have such bad acne if you didn't eat so much damn pizzatime. Hello pizzatime can I take your order. If you're interested, and I know you are, with the help on Jenna and friends I can conjure up a nice protein smoothy for you that doubles as a skin fortifying face mask as well as a pearl necklace. YOU WON'T!