As far as imposing one's ethics on others it occured to me that Pope and Dwayner really aren't all that traditional. In a larger, historical perspective many of the manners in which they choose to climb would probably be considered unethical by previous generations. Chalk, harness, sticky rubber, even using ropes at one time were considered technilogical advances that gave climbers unfair advantages and were to be avoided.
Pope claims that techniques such as bolting, hangdogging, and rehearsing have unfairly led to the capability to climb higher grades but couldn't the same be said about modern climbing shoes and cams (and surely a lot of other gear Pope and Dwayner have used, such as sweater vests, etc.)?
Where one draws a line and claims further advances in the sport are unethical is effectively a completely arbitrary and subjective deliniation. Climbers are always going to be adopting new strategies, techniques, and tools in order to climb bigger steeper and harder things. Such is human nature.
That being said, I think Pope and Dwayner make some legitimate points about over-bolting and unfettered bolting in the wilderness / mountains. But unfortunately any rational arguments get drowned out by their absolutism and will to impose their ethics and style upon others.