Choada_Boy

No statement was made to that effect.

Is that the gully in the Scurlock picture that dberdinka posted (#3?)? The picture of Buck Mountain is the picture of Buck Mountain.

Hawking Radiation Hawking Radiation consists of particles/antiparticles from particle/antiparticle pairs where one of the members of the pair has gone beyond the event horizon into the black hole and the other has escaped (excluding for this discussion black hole evaporation). What if particle one of an entangled pair has already passed the event horizon, and it is "modified" within the black hole? The second particle, because of the entanglement, is "informed" of this modification instantly, violating Einstein's postulate.

No shit, Sherlock. The article suggested that they would change the wave/particle nature of one photon, and the other would learn of the change before it happened. For one, you can only measure either partcle or wave behavior, not both simultaneously. You'd need either a photometer (to measure particle characteristics) or a diffraction grating and an interferometer (to measure wave characteristics), for example. You can't have both. The information regarding the wave/particle state in these entanglement scenarios seems to travel instantaneously. This violates Einstein's postulate. In the proposed experiment, the information travels backwards in time. As the arrow of time only "points" forward, this information would have to travel extradimensionally, IMHYAWRO, TYCDH. Additionally: The "Higgs Ocean" is purely theoretical. The Higgs boson has yet to be discovered, perhaps after 2007 when the Large Hadron Collider comes online at CERN. And don't even start with Super-Strings, they are about as valid as the GSM model. Dru: c has not been constant throughout the history of the universe. Food for thought: What about entangled particles where one falls into a Black Hole? How does the other "know" the state of it's companion if information (light) cannot escape the event horizon?

What about The EPR Paradox? How does this proposed experiment not violate Einstein's postulate that c is the "universal speed limit"? Information would have to travel as light extra-dimensionally. Wouldn't both of the detectors involved have to be "tuned" to either detect particle or wave behavior? It's not like a photon comes out and you say "that one's a particle" or "that ones a wave"

Tao Berman paddled it on Monday, said it was mellow Brah. (wait...I thought I was joking...until I read the whole thread carefully. SICK!!!)

Coed Jujitsu!

My tolerance for bad movies is pretty high but "What the BLEEP Do We Know?" was the worst movie I have ever watched in it's entirety. I stopped watching "Rent" and one that took place entirely in two bathrooms at a bar they sucked so much ass, so they may have been worse.

Happiness

Mike working. That's funny!!

Ask Layton about those frozen creeks sometime...

Currently being buried under DUMPAGE.

I am not a number! I am a free man!!!

I just used The Google to search the Internets...for maps and.......stuff?

For further illumnination, what, exactly, is "work"?

Perhaps the "Borat" flick about to come out, but Mrs Garrison's evolution lesson on last nights "South Park" almost made me wet my PANTS!

That peak's a bit more chossy that the North peak, but there is plenty of potential for some SICK 5.4 FAs.

No they do not! "When tying the climbing rope to your harness, always tie it to the waistbelt tie-in loop and leg loop cross piece correctly."

Didn't Burdo do a route up there somewhere? But, more importantly, who's going to jump on the wall across the highway from Spon Arete?

RAD!

I just bought a second harness so that I can "Double-Harn" from here on out.

There goes all Mike's gear!!

I've always had good results going below Mirkwood and TRing inside the crevasses near the toe of the glacier. There are some pretty deep ones with lots of vertical.

Strands that broke under load would appear "necked down" vs melted under magnification.

He's on Corazon. Different "Great Roof".