No shit, Sherlock. The article suggested that they would change the wave/particle nature of one photon, and the other would learn of the change before it happened. For one, you can only measure either partcle or wave behavior, not both simultaneously. You'd need either a photometer (to measure particle characteristics) or a diffraction grating and an interferometer (to measure wave characteristics), for example. You can't have both.
The information regarding the wave/particle state in these entanglement scenarios seems to travel instantaneously. This violates Einstein's postulate. In the proposed experiment, the information travels backwards in time. As the arrow of time only "points" forward, this information would have to travel extradimensionally, IMHYAWRO, TYCDH.
Additionally:
The "Higgs Ocean" is purely theoretical. The Higgs boson has yet to be discovered, perhaps after 2007 when the Large Hadron Collider comes online at CERN. And don't even start with Super-Strings, they are about as valid as the GSM model.
Dru: c has not been constant throughout the history of the universe.
Food for thought: What about entangled particles where one falls into a Black Hole? How does the other "know" the state of it's companion if information (light) cannot escape the event horizon?