KaskadskyjKozak

when in Rome...

Post deleted by KaskadskyjKozak

you need to get a sense of humor. desperately.

What a surprise. Foraker is a girlie man.

equal time on spray

5 years of variants of the same jokes got old about 4 years ago

you are all obsessed. seek help

There was more to it than that. But what is it with Texans and their damn cronies? All presidents nominate their friends to positions as payback for support. But usually in the past the nominees were qualified, or the position was unimportant (ambassador to Belize, or something like that).

Then perhaps for a second course you ? stick with Agave worms

eto pravda, mnogo russkikh lyudej, rasisty. nu j chto?

*yawn* ad hominem attacks from faceless little trolls like you mean nothing

chrome domes? bald people?

Yeah, not like those 'women belong in the kitchen, hate all immigrants' right wingers..... That's about the dumbest thing I've heard you say. Though I can always wait until you open your mouth again. Uh huh. Liberals keep track of everyone's race. Who was nominated for that position/promoted to that job/won that tournament? Oooh another WHITEY CRACKER? Damn, that figures. blah blah blah. People who keep track of everyone's race at every turn are in fact racist themselves. People who simply live and don't worry about what someone's race is whether it be for a political position or a CEO at a company, your boss, whatever, are not. Liberals love to throw shit on everyone on the right. Turnabout is fair play. Want to call all southerners or conservatives in general racists with impunity? Piss off. The grace period is over on all that bullshit. I see just as much racism from lefties. Even more if you consider the arrogance that underlies social positions that hold that minorities need someone to take care of them.

You are an ass. I see I've hit a sore spot. The truth hurts. Oh, yeah, eat shit.

many conservatisms are concerned about this nomination and have spoken up already.

that is because it is likely to be true. Liberals are some of the most sexist/racist people I've met.

Nope, this tactic has nothing to do with emotion. Playing the race/gender/whatever card seems to be par for the course in American politics these days. If a Dem nominated a minority to a position, and the Republicans challenged it, you would hear a deafening cacophony of charges that the opposition was due to race/gender/sexual orientation. It is all very Machiavellian.

Like when he went before the UN?

McCain is too old.

the irony is overwhelming. liberalism is based on emotion not intellect. this was evidenced by the recent CC.com thread where the "feelings" of the lower class regarding how well-off they are were deemed more important than hard facts.

I used to love her, then I had Tequila... oops wrong group, wrong song

Yob tvoyu mat. Chinga tu madre. baisez votre mère olyhay uckfay eroylay otway ay uckingfay ickheadday ooglegay, enthay anguagelay oolstay

The commissar vanishes... Komisar Vy sam. Vy s nimi s odnogo polya yagody kak i po politichiskom vyglyade tak i tem, kak Vy vzyali b i derzhali b svoyu silu, pusto govorya o ravenstom lyudej.

No one on talk radio anyway. Plenty of others did. Selective amnesia, how convenient. Not.

That's not what I recall. The mantra from the left was as follows: "let the weapons inspectors have some more time - they will find and dispose of the weapons. They are doing their job". And by "nobody" I first and foremost mean Americans - Dems and Republicans. Certain European nations like France and Russia had their own agenda and reason to deny the weapons were there. The US should base its policies on what it knows, not on what other nations claim to be true. I am referring to chemical and biological weapons. Nobody was disputing that Iraq had had them, had used them, and probably still had them. Evidence concerning a nuclear weapons program was flimsy, and that was obvious to everyone even then. It certainly didn't convince me.