KaskadskyjKozak

Yob tvoyu mat. Chinga tu madre. baisez votre mère olyhay uckfay eroylay otway ay uckingfay ickheadday ooglegay, enthay anguagelay oolstay

The commissar vanishes... Komisar Vy sam. Vy s nimi s odnogo polya yagody kak i po politichiskom vyglyade tak i tem, kak Vy vzyali b i derzhali b svoyu silu, pusto govorya o ravenstom lyudej.

No one on talk radio anyway. Plenty of others did. Selective amnesia, how convenient. Not.

That's not what I recall. The mantra from the left was as follows: "let the weapons inspectors have some more time - they will find and dispose of the weapons. They are doing their job". And by "nobody" I first and foremost mean Americans - Dems and Republicans. Certain European nations like France and Russia had their own agenda and reason to deny the weapons were there. The US should base its policies on what it knows, not on what other nations claim to be true. I am referring to chemical and biological weapons. Nobody was disputing that Iraq had had them, had used them, and probably still had them. Evidence concerning a nuclear weapons program was flimsy, and that was obvious to everyone even then. It certainly didn't convince me.

I guess the subtlety of your point evaded me when I read where you wrote: "Are you tellign a lie? .. If so it is sad that we will see no better..... " So, you and Mr. K continue to ignore my argument, and pretty much anybody else's here, but to seize on minutae and fire back with B.S. ... Can either of you REALLY say that Bush and Cheney hadn't both been told that (a) Iraq did not launch 911 (b) the evidence of the Uranium purchase was false © the aluminum tubes could not have been used for a centrifuge (d) we had something like 400,000 soldiers surrounding him, and no real proof that he had anything to threaten us with(Please check my number for me so you can show how wrong I am) Nobody disputed WMDs before the invasion. The dispute was whether their existence posed an imminent threat to the US. If Bush and Co. believed (like everyone else) that WMDs existed then they did not lie about it. You can argue how shitty our intelligence service was, or the judgement of Bush et ali to invade Iraq based on said intelligence, but when you liberals harp on Bush being a "liar", I think you are all

Everyone knows whats going on. It's just that they don't all agree on how to characterize it, or react moving forward.

You guys throw your shit continuously and think it will stick. Just because you say Bush is a liar over and over again ad nauseum does not make it true, nor does it mean that the American public believes it to be true. What you can't take is that this is the case. Well, it is. You've failed to convince the American public. Deal with it. And no amount of the "press" parroting your accusations will change that. So enjoy your sour grapes.

Hypocrisy, Ferraris, and no-bid contracts- the hallmarks of neoconservatism. conservatives drive Ferraris? More like Lincoln Navigators, Cadillac Escalades, Lexuses, and H2s

Gotta love this! Bush is lying, Matt is not. The press need to go after Bush for lying, but PP needs to give Matt a pass for his "honest mistake". Inconsistency and hypocrisy - the hallmarks of liberalism.

Solution: Impeachment New Problem: Dick Cheney. Stalemate.

The loony left.

WTF are you talking about? I never said anything of the sort. If I knew there were no WMDs in Iraq I certainly would not have supported the invasion. Now we've made a mess and cutting-and-running is not an option. As for the policy - it's not about "bringing democracy to Iraq", it's about a long-term geopolitical strategy, which would be nice if it works, but is certainly not guaranteed to. And I don't like Bush - nor did I like his father, but that doesn't mean I don't get annoyed by the constant Bush-hating liberals with their hyperbole, doom-and-gloom rhetoric, negativity, and self-loathing. Bush is in for 3 more years - deal with it, and start rooting for America and success in Iraq, rather than failure. Let's hear some solutions or STFU.

This is classic! Beautiful. I'll respond in two words: equal time.

Now you're getting it! You are describing the modus operandi of the neo-Marxist liberal elites to a tee! Excellent!

It's not the hippie - they have no power. It's the elite-left we need to fear.

The Fifth Column.

I've taken the flu shot for years and never gotten the flu. Last year I could not get one, caught the flu, and was very sick for 3-4 days.

Mutually Assured Destruction. And yes, let Japan and S. Korea help bear the cost and responsibility.

Going by history Chinese leaders have never balked at slaughtering millions for a strategic goal. Couple that with our massive technology transfers to China (examples Boeing 787, cellphones, software, laser gain media) and you've got a formidable foe. Especially when you remember Stalin feared Detroit more than nukes. Slaughtered millions of their own, right? I don't see them attacking the US anytime soon.

Yes, and yes. Sorry Jay, I think we have far more to fear from the Chinese, a culture who don't have the tradition of individual liberty, private property, or many others that we in the west have. Currently they are economically and militarily a far greater threat than a bunch of Koran quoting whackos. Of course to face that threat would be to realize the grave danger of irresponsible fiscal policy and the massive military weakening that technology outsourcing represents. No way. The Chi-Comms love their lives, because they, as good atheists, believe this is it. The Islamofascists believe that 72 virgins are waiting for them after they blow themselves to kingdom come - much more dangerous.

Evaluate her qualifications. Compare them to those of previous nominees (esp. those w/ no prior experience as a judge). Her looks have nothing to do with this.

The queen of cc.com political correctness feminine' giving a pass to a fellow liberal who has just excersized judgement on a woman based solely on her perceived unattractiveness. Priceless! Yep. The hypocrisy of liberals never ceases to amaze me. Who cares what the woman looks like - she should be judged by her qualifications and job performance. Looks are irrelevant, remember? And, since Joshie is a liberal, other liberals will look the other way at his remark - like the feminists regarding Bubbas abuse of power with an intern.

Of course it does, because you, like poor Winston, "love Big Brother".

The new McCarthys = liberals, with their inflexible, dogmatic, intolerant worldview, and penchant for conspiracy-theories, hyperbole, and paranoia. It is you who have replaced a real threat (Islamofascism) with manufactured threats "big corporations", "fundamental Christianity", "American imperialism", among others.

They were all his political enemies.